SAQA All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source.
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY 
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: 

Coat material and components 
SAQA US ID UNIT STANDARD TITLE
9887  Coat material and components 
ORIGINATOR
SGB Manufacturing and Assembly Processes 
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY
-  
FIELD SUBFIELD
Field 06 - Manufacturing, Engineering and Technology Manufacturing and Assembly 
ABET BAND UNIT STANDARD TYPE PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL NQF LEVEL CREDITS
Undefined  Regular  Level 3  NQF Level 03  4 
REGISTRATION STATUS REGISTRATION START DATE REGISTRATION END DATE SAQA DECISION NUMBER
Passed the End Date -
Status was "Reregistered" 		 2018-07-01  2023-06-30  SAQA 06120/18 
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT
2026-06-30   2029-06-30  

In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise.  

This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. 

PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD 
Operating and controlling the coating process to achieve optimum quality coated products. 

LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING 
This unit standard has been designed as part of a progression. It is one of a series of unit standards for activities at and above this level. The credits assigned to it are based on the assumption that I am learning what is needed for this unit standard as part of my learning for a range of related unit standards at this level or below it.

If I have experience in these related activities but do not have credits for them, I can obtain credits by being assessed through a process that recognises prior learning.

If I do not have such experience of related activities, then my learning time will be increased. I can choose to be assessed and obtain credits against those other unit standards as I make progress towards the outcomes of this unit standard. 

UNIT STANDARD RANGE 
The learner is required to work under limited supervision and may be required to assist with the training of others. 

Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: 

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 
Plan and prepare for work activity. 
OUTCOME NOTES 
  • Read and interpret production schedule and determine sequence of operations
  • Check required tools, equipment and coating materials available and in working order
  • Check required components for coating are at work station
  • Report unsafe or worn parts or defective equipment or potential hazards
  • Use special personal protective equipment 
    		•
    OUTCOME RANGE 
    Coating materials include varnish, epoxy, powder, chemicals and metals
    Components for coating include electro-mechanical components not limited to AC and DC machines 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    1. Production output meets specifications. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    2. Coating process cycle time meets customer and company requirements. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    3. Sufficient materials/components continuously available. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 
    4. All defective components and materials are marked or removed from the production line. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 
    5. Scrap is disposed of and surplus material stored. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 
    6. Work area is restored to a safe and serviceable condition. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 
    7. Quality control results are available and communicated to appropriate parties. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 
    8. Reports and records reflect events and conditions. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 
    Coat materials and components. 
    OUTCOME NOTES 
  • Set up equipment and tools
  • Prepare components for coating
  • Blend coating substances
  • Operate coating equipment
  • Identify process deviations and take corrective action 
    		•
    OUTCOME RANGE 
    Coating processes include varnish impregnation, epoxy coating, spray painting, dipping and electro-plating 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    1. Production output meets specifications. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    2. Coating process cycle time meets customer and company requirements. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    3. Sufficient materials/components continuously available. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 
    4. All defective components and materials are marked or removed from the production line. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 
    5. Scrap is disposed of and surplus material stored. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 
    6. Work area is restored to a safe and serviceable condition. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 
    7. Quality control results are available and communicated to appropriate parties. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 
    8. Reports and records reflect events and conditions. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 
    Apply quality control procedures on coated materials and components . 
    OUTCOME NOTES 
  • Inspect test and measure coated materials and components
  • Report quality deviations
  • Communicate and document quality control results 
    		•
    OUTCOME RANGE 
  • Measuring equipment includes coating thickness gauges and precision measuring equipment
  • Deviations include electrical, mechanical and aesthetic deviations
  • Tests include coating thickness tests 
    		•

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    1. Production output meets specifications. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    2. Coating process cycle time meets customer and company requirements. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    3. Sufficient materials/components continuously available. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 
    4. All defective components and materials are marked or removed from the production line. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 
    5. Scrap is disposed of and surplus material stored. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 
    6. Work area is restored to a safe and serviceable condition. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 
    7. Quality control results are available and communicated to appropriate parties. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 
    8. Reports and records reflect events and conditions. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 
    Recognise and report changes and/or malfunctions while operating. 
    OUTCOME NOTES 
    Report problems of quality, operation, output, safety 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    1. Production output meets specifications. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    2. Coating process cycle time meets customer and company requirements. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    3. Sufficient materials/components continuously available. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 
    4. All defective components and materials are marked or removed from the production line. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 
    5. Scrap is disposed of and surplus material stored. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 
    6. Work area is restored to a safe and serviceable condition. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 
    7. Quality control results are available and communicated to appropriate parties. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 
    8. Reports and records reflect events and conditions. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 
    Perform finishing activities. 
    OUTCOME NOTES 
  • Dispose of scrap material and store any surplus materials
  • Restore work area to a serviceable condition 
    		•

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    1. Production output meets specifications. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    2. Coating process cycle time meets customer and company requirements. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    3. Sufficient materials/components continuously available. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 
    4. All defective components and materials are marked or removed from the production line. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 
    5. Scrap is disposed of and surplus material stored. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 
    6. Work area is restored to a safe and serviceable condition. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 
    7. Quality control results are available and communicated to appropriate parties. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 
    8. Reports and records reflect events and conditions. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 6 
    Work safely with due care for self, fellow workers, equipment, materials and the environment. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    1. Production output meets specifications. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    2. Coating process cycle time meets customer and company requirements. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    3. Sufficient materials/components continuously available. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 
    4. All defective components and materials are marked or removed from the production line. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 
    5. Scrap is disposed of and surplus material stored. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 
    6. Work area is restored to a safe and serviceable condition. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 
    7. Quality control results are available and communicated to appropriate parties. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 
    8. Reports and records reflect events and conditions. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 7 
    Determine output figures and material usage. 
    OUTCOME NOTES 
    Complete documentation 
    OUTCOME RANGE 
    Documentation includes checklists, coating data and technical reports 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    1. Production output meets specifications. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    2. Coating process cycle time meets customer and company requirements. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    3. Sufficient materials/components continuously available. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 
    4. All defective components and materials are marked or removed from the production line. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 
    5. Scrap is disposed of and surplus material stored. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 
    6. Work area is restored to a safe and serviceable condition. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 
    7. Quality control results are available and communicated to appropriate parties. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 
    8. Reports and records reflect events and conditions. 
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES 
    Indicators:

    1. Components are prepared for coating according to worksite procedures.
    2. Coating substances are blending according to specifications.
    3. Adjustments to process are made in a timely manner.
    4. Reject/waste is minimised or adequate explanation given.
    5. Appropriate quality control procedures are performed and repeated as necessary to determine the nature of the problem or obtain required results.
    6. Quality deviations are reported to correct parties in a timely manner and are described accurately.
    7. Finishing activities are carried out promptly to avoid bottle necks in the process.
    8. Work is carried out in a safe manner.
    9. A clean and tidy work environment is maintained.

    Understanding confirmed:

    1. Consequences of not following safe working practices.
    2. Importance of preparing components.
    3. Implications of not operating coating plant in correct sequences.
    4. Implications of failing to carry out required adjustments during process.
    5. Implications for accuracy of the misuse of measuring and testing equipment.
    6. Consequences of materials spillage.
    7. Consequences of not accurately completing and returning documentation.
    8. Consequences of not disposing of material according to statutory requirements. 


    UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS 
    My assessment will be governed by the policies and guidelines of the MERSETA Education and Training Quality Assurer who has jurisdiction over this field of learning. My assessor will (at the very least) be accredited and have a technical qualification in this learning area.

    I can be assessed in the language of my choice although if I have to report incidents or conditions to someone else, I will be assessed on my ability to report in the language commonly used in my working environment.

    I will be assessed in the workplace but I can submit documents, projects, test results and assignments that were not produced in the workplace.

    I can be assessed against this unit standard to obtain credits or as part of an integrated assessment for a qualification. 

    UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE 
    Names & functions of:
  • Product and equipment terminology associated with the coating process
  • Production-related documentation
  • Coating materials
  • Cleaning materials
  • Components

    Attributes, descriptions, characteristics & properties:
  • Materials, equipment, controls
  • Types of faults and defects

    Sensory cues:
  • Ad-hoc tests for conditions (smell, colour, sound)

    Purpose of:
  • Pre-operational checks
  • Preparing components for coating
  • Operating coating plant in correct sequence

    Processes, events, causes and effects, implications:
  • Consequences of not following safe working practices
  • Nature and sequence of operations
  • Operational parameters
  • Impact on production costs of delays
  • Consequences of not disposing of waste material

    Procedures and techniques:
  • Start up
  • Shut down
  • Capturing test results, verifying and recording data
  • Methods of compiling technical reports
  • Methods and techniques of diagnosing faults and defects
  • Methods and techniques for preparing coating products
  • Methods and techniques for preparing components
  • Methods and techniques for coating components
  • Sequence of applying coating to components
  • Methods for disposal of waste products
  • Team interaction

    Regulations, legislation, agreements, policies, standards
  • Quality standards and specifications
  • Applicable safety, health and environmental protection legislation and standard

    Theory: rules, principles, laws
  • Work and temperature changes
  • Hardness of materials (steels, hardening, etc.)
  • Ferrous and non-ferrous metals: oxidation, corrosion, contamination
  • Relevant mechanical and electrical engineering theory

    Relationships, systems:
  • Relationships between equipment, materials, processes and final coated product 
    		•


    Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING 
    Identify and solve problems:
  • Recognise and respond to deviations and problems with process
  • Identify and respond to problems which will impact on safety, quality 
    		•

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING 
    Work effectively with others:
  • Interact with others to achieve production output 
    		•

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING 
    Organise and manage myself and my activities:
  • Plan and manage equipment operations
  • Apply procedures and practices which will reduce the possibility of accidents, reduce damage and time 
    		•

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING 
    Collect, analyse, organise and critically evaluate information:
  • Translate conditions or instructions into specific actions or criteria for the coating process 
    		•

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING 
    Communicate effectively:
  • Report incidents and conditions related to the process or operations
  • Document all occurrences and results in required format 
    		•

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE 
    Use science and technology effectively and critically:
  • Blend coating materials
  • Treat materials correctly 
    		•

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING 
    Demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of related systems:
  • Relate the process conditions to the condition and properties of the final product 
    		•

    REREGISTRATION HISTORY 
    As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. 

    QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: 
      ID QUALIFICATION TITLE PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL NQF LEVEL STATUS END DATE PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY
    Core  58862   National Certificate: Electro-Mechanical Winding  Level 3  NQF Level 03  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered"     		 2023-06-30  MERSETA 
    Elective  21005   National Certificate: Automotive Component Manufacturing and Assembly  Level 3  NQF Level 03  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered"     		 2008-11-01  Was MERSETA until Last Date for Achievement 
    Elective  24196   National Certificate: Construction Material Manufacturing  Level 3  NQF Level 03  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered"     		 2023-06-30  CETA 
    Elective  21015   National Certificate: Metal and Engineering Manufacturing Processes  Level 3  NQF Level 03  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered"     		 2011-02-16  Was MERSETA until Last Date for Achievement 
    Elective  58719   National Certificate: Metals Processing  Level 3  NQF Level 03  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered"     		 2023-06-30  MERSETA 


    PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: 
    This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here.
     
    NONE 


    All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source.