SAQA All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source.
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY 
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: 

Examine social features as pertaining to the workplace 
SAQA US ID UNIT STANDARD TITLE
8664  Examine social features as pertaining to the workplace 
ORIGINATOR
SGB Hospitality,Tourism,Travel, Leisure and Gaming 
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY
-  
FIELD SUBFIELD
Field 11 - Services Hospitality, Tourism, Travel, Gaming and Leisure 
ABET BAND UNIT STANDARD TYPE PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL NQF LEVEL CREDITS
Undefined  Regular  Level 5  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 
REGISTRATION STATUS REGISTRATION START DATE REGISTRATION END DATE SAQA DECISION NUMBER
Passed the End Date -
Status was "Reregistered" 
2018-07-01  2023-06-30  SAQA 06120/18 
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT
2026-06-30   2029-06-30  

In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise.  

This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. 

PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD 
A person assessed as competent against this unit standard will be able to:
  • Select a sociological feature for consideration and justify this choice with reference to South African workplaces.
  • Examine South African workplaces in terms of the sociological feature.
  • Analyse the constitutional, legislative or policy issues impacting on the sociological feature.
  • Explain the impact on individuals and groups in the workplace.
  • Reflect on the implications for themselves.

    This competence will equip learners with thinking tools which underpin their ability to participate thoughtfully and ethically in any environment. In so doing, it will contribute to the development of a more critical citizenry. 

  • LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING 
    No prior learning is assumed. 

    UNIT STANDARD RANGE 
    Guides to the scope and complexity of the specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge are provided in ranges/points beneath each. These are prefaced by "e.g." since they are neither comprehensive nor necessarily appropriate to all contexts. Alternatives must however be comparable in scope and complexity. 

    Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 
    Select a sociological issue for consideration. 
    OUTCOME NOTES 
    Select a sociological issue for consideration and justify the choice with reference to South African workplaces. 
    OUTCOME RANGE 
  • Sociological features could include any of the categories used in the Employment Equity Act, the Bill of Rights or drawn from social theory.
  • Justification must include at least an argument as to the relevance of the issue to South African workplaces. 

  • ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    The assessment of a person against this standard should meet the requirements of established assessment principles.

    It will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools which are appropriate to the contexts in which the skills will be applied. These activities and tools may include an appropriate combination of self assessment and peer assessment; formative and summative assessment; and portfolios and observations.

    The assessment should ensure that all the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes, and essential embedded knowledges are assessed.
    1. The specific outcomes must be assessed through observation of performance. Supporting evidence should be used to prove competence of specific outcomes only when they are not clearly seen in the actual performance.
    2. Essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in its own right, through oral and written evidence. It cannot be assessed only through seeing the knowledge being applied.
    3. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If the person being assessed is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if they are able to perform the specific outcomes but are unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should also not be assessed as competent.
    4. Evidence of the specified critical cross-field outcomes should be found both in performance and in the essential embedded knowledge. 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 
    Analyse South African workplaces in terms of any key sociological feature. 
    OUTCOME RANGE 
    Analysis requires a description and explanation of both current and historical patterns. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    The assessment of a person against this standard should meet the requirements of established assessment principles.

    It will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools which are appropriate to the contexts in which the skills will be applied. These activities and tools may include an appropriate combination of self assessment and peer assessment; formative and summative assessment; and portfolios and observations.

    The assessment should ensure that all the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes, and essential embedded knowledges are assessed.
    1. The specific outcomes must be assessed through observation of performance. Supporting evidence should be used to prove competence of specific outcomes only when they are not clearly seen in the actual performance.
    2. Essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in its own right, through oral and written evidence. It cannot be assessed only through seeing the knowledge being applied.
    3. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If the person being assessed is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if they are able to perform the specific outcomes but are unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should also not be assessed as competent.
    4. Evidence of the specified critical cross-field outcomes should be found both in performance and in the essential embedded knowledge. 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 
    Analyse the constitutional, legislative or policy issues impacting on the sociological feature. 
    OUTCOME RANGE 
    Analysis must include a critical evaluation of the constitutional, legislative or policy requirements. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    The assessment of a person against this standard should meet the requirements of established assessment principles.

    It will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools which are appropriate to the contexts in which the skills will be applied. These activities and tools may include an appropriate combination of self assessment and peer assessment; formative and summative assessment; and portfolios and observations.

    The assessment should ensure that all the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes, and essential embedded knowledges are assessed.
    1. The specific outcomes must be assessed through observation of performance. Supporting evidence should be used to prove competence of specific outcomes only when they are not clearly seen in the actual performance.
    2. Essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in its own right, through oral and written evidence. It cannot be assessed only through seeing the knowledge being applied.
    3. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If the person being assessed is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if they are able to perform the specific outcomes but are unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should also not be assessed as competent.
    4. Evidence of the specified critical cross-field outcomes should be found both in performance and in the essential embedded knowledge. 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 
    Explain the impact on individuals and groups in the workplace. 
    OUTCOME RANGE 
    Explanation must be justified with reference to actual rather than hypothetical instances. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    The assessment of a person against this standard should meet the requirements of established assessment principles.

    It will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools which are appropriate to the contexts in which the skills will be applied. These activities and tools may include an appropriate combination of self assessment and peer assessment; formative and summative assessment; and portfolios and observations.

    The assessment should ensure that all the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes, and essential embedded knowledges are assessed.
    1. The specific outcomes must be assessed through observation of performance. Supporting evidence should be used to prove competence of specific outcomes only when they are not clearly seen in the actual performance.
    2. Essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in its own right, through oral and written evidence. It cannot be assessed only through seeing the knowledge being applied.
    3. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If the person being assessed is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if they are able to perform the specific outcomes but are unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should also not be assessed as competent.
    4. Evidence of the specified critical cross-field outcomes should be found both in performance and in the essential embedded knowledge. 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 
    Reflect on the implications for themselves. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    The assessment of a person against this standard should meet the requirements of established assessment principles.

    It will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools which are appropriate to the contexts in which the skills will be applied. These activities and tools may include an appropriate combination of self assessment and peer assessment; formative and summative assessment; and portfolios and observations.

    The assessment should ensure that all the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes, and essential embedded knowledges are assessed.
    1. The specific outcomes must be assessed through observation of performance. Supporting evidence should be used to prove competence of specific outcomes only when they are not clearly seen in the actual performance.
    2. Essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in its own right, through oral and written evidence. It cannot be assessed only through seeing the knowledge being applied.
    3. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If the person being assessed is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if they are able to perform the specific outcomes but are unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should also not be assessed as competent.
    4. Evidence of the specified critical cross-field outcomes should be found both in performance and in the essential embedded knowledge. 


    UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS 
    1. Anyone assessing a learner or moderating the assessment of a learner against this unit standard must be registered as an assessor with the relevant ETQA.
    2. Any institution offering learning that will enable the achievement of this unit standard must be accredited as a provider with the relevant ETQA.
    3. Assessment and moderation of assessment will be overseen by the relevant ETQA according to the ETQA`s policies and guidelines for assessment and moderation; in terms of agreements reached around assessment and moderation between ETQA`s (including professional bodies); and in terms of the moderation guideline detailed under point 4 immediately below.
    4. Moderation must include both internal and external moderation of assessments at exit points of the qualification, unless ETQA policies specify otherwise. Moderation should also encompass achievement of the competence described both in individual unit standards as well as the integrated competence described in the qualification.

    Anyone wishing to be assessed against this qualification may apply to be assessed by any assessment agency, assessor or provider institution which is accredited by the relevant ETQA. 

    UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE 
    The person acquiring this unit standard should be able to demonstrate a knowledge and understanding of:
    1. The spectrum of sociological features relevant to South African workplaces.
    2. The constitutional, legislative and policy requirements relating to any one of these features.
    3. The historical evolution of workplaces in South Africa in terms of the key sociological feature chosen.
    4. Any two social theories which explain the impact of the sociological feature on individuals and groups within the workplace.
    5. The relevance of social understanding for workplaces and the actions of individuals within the workplace. 


    Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING 
    Working effectively with others as a member of a team, group, organisation or community - relates to the following specific outcomes:
  • Select a sociological issue for consideration and justify the choice with reference to South African workplaces.
  • Analyse South African workplaces in terms of any key sociological feature.
  • Analyse the constitutional, legislative or policy issues impacting on the sociological feature.
  • Explain the impact on individuals and groups in the workplace. 

  • UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING 
    Understanding the world as a set of related systems - relates to the following specific outcomes:
  • Select a sociological issue for consideration and justify the choice with reference to South African workplaces.
  • Analyse South African workplaces in terms of any key sociological feature.
  • Analyse the constitutional, legislative or policy issues impacting on the sociological feature.
  • Explain the impact on individuals and groups in the workplace. 

  • UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING 
    Contributing to the personal development of learners and the society and economy, by participating as responsible citizens in the life of local, national and global communities - relates to the following specific outcomes:
  • Select a sociological issue for consideration and justify the choice with reference to South African workplaces.
  • Analyse South African workplaces in terms of any key sociological feature.
  • Analyse the constitutional, legislative or policy issues impacting on the sociological feature.
  • Explain the impact on individuals and groups in the workplace. 

  • REREGISTRATION HISTORY 
    As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. 

    UNIT STANDARD NOTES 
    Assessment case studies and other supplementary to be developed through the learnership pilots. 

    QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: 
      ID QUALIFICATION TITLE PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL NQF LEVEL STATUS END DATE PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY
    Core  48883   Further Education and Training Certificate: Small Business Advising (Information Support)  Level 4  NQF Level 04  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2023-06-30  SERVICES 
    Fundamental  59409   National Certificate: Agricultural Extension  Level 5  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2023-06-30  AgriSETA 
    Fundamental  24195   National Certificate: Community Conservation: Practice and Co-ordination  Level 5  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Registered" 
    2006-04-09  CATHSSETA 
    Fundamental  67693   National Certificate: Fitness  Level 5  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2023-06-30  As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual 
    Fundamental  18943   National Certificate: Tourism: Cabin Crew  Level 5  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2009-01-10  CATHSSETA 
    Fundamental  67692   National Diploma: Coaching Science  Level 5  NQF Level 05  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2023-06-30  As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual 
    Fundamental  20613   National Diploma: Event Co-ordination  Level 5  NQF Level 05  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2023-06-30  CATHSSETA 
    Fundamental  67691   National Diploma: Fitness  Level 5  NQF Level 05  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2023-06-30  As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual 
    Fundamental  20414   National Diploma: Service Management  Level 5  NQF Level 05  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2023-06-30  CATHSSETA 
    Elective  65989   Further Education and Training Certificate: Human Settlements Development  Level 4  NQF Level 04  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2023-06-30  CETA 
    Elective  36436   National Certificate: Local Economic Development  Level 4  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L4  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2023-06-30  LG SETA 
    Elective  93993   National Certificate: Labour Relations Practice  Level 5  NQF Level 05  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered" 
    2023-06-30  As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual 


    PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: 
    This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here.
     
    1. A4 Consultancy CC 
    2. Africa Institute For Public Administration 
    3. African Divas 
    4. Aiyana Hair and Beauty 
    5. Amabamba Recruitment 
    6. Amangile Academy (Pty) Ltd 
    7. AMATHUBA HUB 
    8. AVAX SA 481 CC. T/A Mandisa Development Services 
    9. AVC Corporate Advisory Services (PTY) LTD. 
    10. Bantubanye Skills 
    11. Belgravia Institute of Mangement (PTY) LTD 
    12. Bettes - Types Trading and Projects 
    13. Black Thari Trading Enterprise 
    14. Boikgantsho Consulting & Events 
    15. Boni Africa Events & Development 
    16. C Madumo Projects cc 
    17. Chuene Bosa Bosele Trading & Enterprise (PTY) LTD. 
    18. Continuing Education Programme 
    19. Daily Double Traiding 281 
    20. Development Bank of Southern Africa (DBSA) 
    21. DialNx Consultants 
    22. Ditirelo Skills Development Services 
    23. Ditlou Solutions 
    24. Divine Academy Skills Training 
    25. Edutraining Business College 
    26. Elective Training Institute Enterprise CC 
    27. Evers Xcellence Management Consulting (Pty) Ltd. 
    28. Express Model 405 
    29. Faith First Trading 
    30. Gauteng Association Of Local Authorities 
    31. Glere Skills and Consultants 
    32. Global Care Trading 100 CC 
    33. Global Star Trading CC 
    34. Hanyeleni Business Enterprise 
    35. Healthy Living Consulting (PTY) LTD 
    36. Hercuscope 
    37. Hlombe and Associates 
    38. Ikwanda Customs Consultants CC 
    39. Inkcubeko YakwaNtu Trading 
    40. INTERMASIKO CC 
    41. IQ Skills Academy (PTY) LTD. 
    42. Iziko Capacity Building CC. 
    43. JIT Projects 
    44. Jobafrik Consulting 
    45. Josmap Training Institute 
    46. Jucamo Shelf 4 CC. 
    47. Kernel Management and Consulting (PTY) LTD. 
    48. Kgotla Trading Enterprise 
    49. Khumo Project Management Services 
    50. Kia Chuma 
    51. KPK Training Solutions 
    52. KZN Tourism Training 
    53. Lelethu Training (Pty) Ltd 
    54. Lesias Educational Services 
    55. Lewerb Holdings (PTY) Ltd 
    56. Life Long ABET Consulting 
    57. Limpopo LED Resource Centre 
    58. Local Government Management Academy 
    59. Lwazi Community Facilitator 
    60. M.I.C. Training and Development 
    61. M28 Consulting and Training 
    62. Mafusega Projects 
    63. Mahayi HRD Services cc 
    64. Makwenzeke Grass and Cleaners CC. 
    65. Mancosa (PTY) LTD T/A Management College of Southern Africa 
    66. MANCOSA Pty (Ltd) 
    67. MARUATONA TRAINING AND SKILLS DEVELOPMENT 
    68. Mbokazi & Mkhize 
    69. Mc Intosh Xaba and Associates (MXA) 
    70. Mgwezane Training and Events Management CC. 
    71. Miczo's Enterprise 
    72. Mimoisa Business Solutions CC 
    73. Misol Projects cc 
    74. MJ Mafunisa Consulting (PTY) LTD 
    75. Mmanape Management Solutions 
    76. MML Consulting CC. 
    77. Mod-Mosh Projects and Consulting (PTY) LTD 
    78. Mohlaje Solutions (Pty) Ltd 
    79. Moripe Business Training and Consultants (PTY) LTD 
    80. Mosako Wa Kitso 
    81. Multi-Skills Training & Development Institute (Pty) Ltd 
    82. Multiple Productive Management Solutions 
    83. National Peace Accord Trust 
    84. Ndrendre Building & General Services 
    85. Nemalale Eagles Consultancy CC 
    86. Neopeo Trading & Projects 
    87. Nhlahle Development Agency 
    88. Omithombo Management Academy 
    89. Outeniqua Leadership Institute 
    90. Pandelani Investment Holdings (PTY) LTD. 
    91. Peakford Management Consulting 
    92. Pebetse Training and Consulting 
    93. PFIM Trading (Pty) Ltd 
    94. Philani Solutions 
    95. Pioneer Business Consulting 
    96. PM Skills House 
    97. PMA Holdings (PTY ) LTD. 
    98. Power Rush Trading 170 CC. 
    99. Powernexus 
    100. Progressive School of Business and Engineering (Pty) 
    101. Propat CC 
    102. Prospect Plus 
    103. Puisanong Investment Enterprises Pty Ltd 
    104. Rantsane Mario Training Solutions 
    105. Reflections Development Institute 
    106. Regeneration Maqor Group 
    107. Regent Business School (Pty) Ltd t/a Regent Business School 
    108. Sabela Trading and Projects CC. 
    109. Sebobatho Project Management 
    110. Senelo Trading CC 
    111. Shirs Vision Compleadev (Pty) Ltd 
    112. Sisezwa Business Enterprise 
    113. Siyakhula Trust ETD Institute Pty Ltd 
    114. Siza Nesu Training and Consultants 
    115. South African Institute of Learning (SAIL) 
    116. South African ABET Development Agency SAADA 
    117. South African Governance and Business College 
    118. SWARANANG MANAGEMENT CONSULTING CC 
    119. Talent Centre Training 
    120. TEE ZET Group 
    121. The Chosen Consulting Services 
    122. Thekwini College 
    123. Thubelihle Graduate Institute 
    124. Tirisano Ya Bakwena Consultants 
    125. Tlaletso Consultants 
    126. Tlotlangthuto Training & Consulting 
    127. Trade Avail 172 CC. 
    128. Tradesman Consulting and Training Solutions 
    129. Training at Work (Pty) Ltd 
    130. Tru-ThoughtsTrading and Projects 
    131. Tshelopele Development Institution 
    132. Tswelopele Rural Development Network 
    133. Twin Peak Technologies 
    134. Umqondo Consultancy 
    135. UNIVERSITY OF BUSINESS EXCELLENCE(PTY)LTD 
    136. University of Venda 
    137. Vantage Training 
    138. Victorompie Enterprises CC. 
    139. VUCA INSTITUTE OF LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT 
    140. Ya Hina Management Consulting and projects 
    141. ZMG CONSULTING 



    All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source.