All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Demonstrate knowledge and insight into a bid committee system applicable to an Organ of State in South Africa |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
337061 | Demonstrate knowledge and insight into a bid committee system applicable to an Organ of State in South Africa | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
Task Team - Public Sector | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 03 - Business, Commerce and Management Studies | Public Administration | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 15 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2026-06-30 | 2029-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
This Unit Standard is intended for learners in the public sector and Organs of State who serve on Bid Specification, Evaluation or Adjudication Committees as part of a bid process. It will be useful for Supply Chain Management Practitioners, Senior Managers, Managers, Accounting Officers, and End Users who operate in cross functional teams. It may also be useful for specialists in specific fields who are members of bid committees.
The qualifying learner is capable of: |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
It is assumed that learners are competent in Communication and Mathematical Literacy at NQF Level 4. |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
The typical scope of this Unit Standard is:
|
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Discuss elements of the Supply Chain Management model that apply to the bid committee system. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The elements of a relevant Supply Chain Management model are analysed with reference to how the different bid committees relate to the elements. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Elements include, but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The role players in the bid committee system are identified with reference to their roles, impact and relevance on the committees. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Role players may include, but are not limited to:
|
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Apply knowledge of the applicable regulatory framework to ensure compliance. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The regulatory framework applicable to the bid committee system in a particular Organ of State is identified and an indication is given of how each legislation and/or prescript regulates the decision making of a committee. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
The regulatory environment may include, but is not limited to:
|
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Discuss the importance of ethical conduct in the bid committee process. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Codes of Conduct relating to the bid committee process are analysed and applied to describe the behaviour required of a member of a bid committee. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The rationale for a Code of Conduct is explained with reference to the benefits and consequences in cases of abuse. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Apply knowledge of the functions of the Bid Specification Committee. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Recommendations for the composition of a Bid Specification committee are made that reflect the specific commodity to be procured and legislative requirements. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Knowledge of the functions of a Specification Committee is applied to prepare a bid invitation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
The bid invitation may include, but is not limited to:
|
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
Apply knowledge of the functions of the Bid Evaluation Committee. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Recommendations for the composition of a Bid Evaluation Committee are made and substantiated for a specific commodity. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Standard bidding documents are checked for completeness against predetermined criteria for a specific commodity. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
A bid is evaluated against a specification or terms of reference, relevant legislation, the General Conditions of Contract, Specific Conditions of Contract and other predetermined criteria. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
A bid is evaluated in terms of the capacity and capability of a bidder. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
A counter proposal is evaluated for acceptability to the Organ of State. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
A recommendation for award is made and substantiated in the format required by a specific Organ of State. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Recommendations include, but are not limited to:
|
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 6 |
Apply knowledge of the functions of the Bid Adjudication Committee. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Recommendations for the composition of a Bid Adjudication Committee are made and substantiated based on prescribed guidelines. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The powers of a Bid Adjudication committee in making decisions are discussed with reference to the implications and consequences of the committee's decisions. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Recommendations from a Bid Evaluation Committee are scrutinized for fairness, correctness and compliance with predetermined criteria. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The importance of members declaring own interests is discussed with reference to the consequences of neglecting to disclose for the member and the Organ of State. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The Code of conduct for the Adjudication Committee is analysed to determine compliance to meeting procedure. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
Recommendations are made and reported to the relevant authorities. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Relevant authorities may include, but are not limited to:
|
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
The learner is able to identify and solve problems in which responses show that responsible decisions using critical and creative thinking have been made in analysing bid documents and making and substantiating recommendations from the different Bid Committees. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
The learner is able to work effectively with others as a member of a team, group, organisation or community in participating in a bid committee. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
The learner is able to organise and manage him/herself and his/her activities responsibly and effectively in performing the functions of a Bid committee. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
The learner is able to collect, organise and critically evaluate information in evaluating bids. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
The learner is able to communicate effectively in the modes of oral and/or written presentations in reporting findings. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
The learner is able to demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of related systems by recognising that problem-solving contexts do not exist in isolation in understanding the relationship between the three Bid committees and elements of Supply Chain management. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING |
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
N/A |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Elective | 57712 | Further Education and Training Certificate: Generic Management | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual |
Elective | 50372 | Further Education and Training Certificate: Municipal Finance and Administration | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | LG SETA |
Elective | 57824 | Further Education and Training Certificate: Public Administration | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | PSETA |
Elective | 50060 | National Certificate: Public Administration | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | PSETA |
Elective | 80047 | National Certificate: Road Safety Development | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | SAS SETA |
Elective | 74149 | National Certificate: Supply Chain Management | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | TETA |
Elective | 49554 | National Diploma: Public Finance Management and Administration | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | LG SETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
1. | A4 Consultancy CC |
2. | Abacwaningi Business Solutions |
3. | Academics Dynamics (Pty) Ltd |
4. | Aldabri 106 Institute for Quality Pty Ltd |
5. | Alika Investment CC |
6. | Amabamba Recruitment |
7. | AVAX SA 481 CC. T/A Mandisa Development Services |
8. | BPL Academy |
9. | Buena Vista Learning Academy |
10. | Centre for Logistics Excellence (Pty) Ltd |
11. | Circleway College |
12. | Dee-Bravo Training Centre |
13. | Diversity technology Training Institute |
14. | Edequette Training Institute |
15. | Edu Wize Group Pty Ltd |
16. | Excellent Minds Institute (Pty) Ltd |
17. | Faranang Marketing |
18. | Furniture World Training Centre |
19. | Gauteng City College |
20. | Global Maritime Legal Solutions Pty Ltd |
21. | Growth Management Consulting |
22. | Hamonate Consulting |
23. | HarvestHouse Consulting and Training South Africa PTY LTD |
24. | HDPSA |
25. | HDPSA GROUP PTY LTD |
26. | Imperial Logistics & Transport A Div Of Imper |
27. | Innovative Shared Services |
28. | IQ Skills Academy (PTY) LTD. |
29. | Jobafrik Consulting |
30. | Josmap Training Institute |
31. | kholwa management and training consultancy (pty) Ltd |
32. | Khulani HR Consultancy (Pty) Ltd |
33. | KOKANO PROJECTS PTY LTD |
34. | KPI Consulting Pty LTD |
35. | KYM MANAGEMENT CONSULTING |
36. | Learning Exchange Pty (Ltd) |
37. | Lewerb Holdings (PTY) Ltd |
38. | Madidi Supply Chain Institute & Business Institute |
39. | Mafamawethu Consultants |
40. | Mamuhle Academy |
41. | MANCOSA Pty (Ltd) |
42. | Maritime Business Institute |
43. | MATEPE INVESTMENTS (PTY) LTD |
44. | Metro Minds |
45. | Morar Incorporated - KZN |
46. | MTK Corporate Solutions |
47. | Ndwamato Training Solutions (Pty) Ltd |
48. | Nemalale Eagles Consultancy CC |
49. | Pachi Global Foundation |
50. | Pebetse Training and Consulting |
51. | Petra Institute of Development |
52. | PFIM Trading (Pty) Ltd |
53. | PMA Holdings (PTY ) LTD. |
54. | Quantum Leap College Pty Ltd |
55. | Reflections Development Institute |
56. | Regent Business School (Pty) Ltd t/a Regent Business School |
57. | Resonance Institue of Learning |
58. | Royal Impression Academy |
59. | Silalele Consulting CC. |
60. | Siza Nesu Training and Consultants |
61. | Tachfin Holdings |
62. | TEST 3_18 March 2019 |
63. | Test NN |
64. | THE SKILLS COLLEGE FOR DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING(PTY) LTD |
65. | Thobologo Training and Education Group |
66. | Umqondo Consultancy |
67. | UNIVERSITY OF BUSINESS EXCELLENCE(PTY)LTD |
68. | University of Pretoria |
69. | University of Venda |
70. | Velile Supply Chain Consulting |
71. | VSL General Trading CC |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |