All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Conduct post harvest treatment of cut roses |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
264175 | Conduct post harvest treatment of cut roses | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Ornamental Horticulture and Landscape | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 01 - Agriculture and Nature Conservation | Horticulture | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 2 | NQF Level 02 | 6 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
A person credited with this unit standard will be able to:
|
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
Learners accessing this qualification will have demonstrated competence in:
|
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
N/A |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Apply health and safety in post harvest treatment of cut roses. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The personal protective clothing and equipment that should be used while conducting the post harvest treatment of cut roses is identified and described in terms of the protection that the items provide. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The importance of wearing gloves while conducting the post harvest treatment of cut roses is explained in terms of the prevention of injuries that might otherwise occur. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The safety practices that must be followed while handling hazardous chemicals are demonstrated in accordance with the company's procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The necessity to adhere to the instructions of the control chemicals data sheet is explained in terms of the danger that the chemicals pose to humans and to the environment. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The possible consequences of ignoring safety precautions is described in terms of the detrimental affect this may have on a worker's health. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
The good housekeeping practices for maintaining the post harvest work areas are demonstrated in accordance with the company's procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
The benefits of utilising good housekeeping practices are explained in relation to the positive results that can be achieved in the reduction of safety incidents. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Utilise the necessary tools and equipment for post harvest treatment of cut roses. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The importance of using tools that are in good working order is explained and the preventative practices to ensure that their optimum condition is maintained, are demonstrated in accordance with the company's procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The necessity of reporting faulty equipment is explained in terms of optimising the operational effectiveness of the equipment. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The practices for handling and lifting buckets to ensure that the quality of cut roses is maintained are demonstrated in accordance with the company's procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The correct storage of the packing materials and other equipment is demonstrated in accordance with the company's procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The importance of disinfecting the tools and equipment is explained in terms of maintaining the health of the cut rose. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Describe the practices that serve to maximize the vase-life of cut roses. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The role that temperature plays in the post harvest treatment of cut roses is explained in terms of the objectives of ensuring that the optimum vase-life of roses is achieved. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The necessity of maintaining the cold chain through all processes and storage is explained in respect of preserving the quality of the cut roses. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The reasons for the application of post harvest chemicals for the cut roses is explained terms of ensuring that the optimum vase-life of roses is achieved. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The methods to apply a post harvest chemical treatment to cut roses are demonstrated in accordance with the company's procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The importance of minimising the harvest to storage time is explained in terms of ensuring the introduction of the cut roses to the cold chain and thereby the maintenance of quality longevity of the cut rose. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
The role of humidity control in the packing shed is explained in respect of the maintenance of the quality of cut roses. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
The objectives of maintaining good plant hygiene is explained in terms of achieving the optimal the vase-life of cut roses. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Perform the bunching of cut roses. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The necessity of bunching the cut roses uniformly is explained in terms of the specific market requirements. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The procedures for bunching cut roses are demonstrated in accordance with the company's procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The importance of packing roses evenly within the bunch to enhance their presentation is explained and the methods to achieve this are demonstrated in accordance with the company's procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The methods to tying a bunch of roses in order to secure the bunch and prevent damage to the blooms are demonstrated in accordance with the company's procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The trimming of a bunch of roses to maximise their presentation and saleability is demonstrated in accordance with the company's procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
The methods of stripping leaves and thorns from the stems of cut roses are demonstrated in accordance with the company's procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
The correct method of wrapping a bunch in cellophane to optimise the presentation of cut roses is demonstrated in accordance with the company's procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
The positioning of the label on the cellophane is demonstrated in accordance with the company's procedures. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
Describe the various aspects that influence the grading and value of a cut rose harvest. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The reasons why the grading of cut roses is affected by the harvesting stage are explained in terms of the shelf life and marketability that these exhibit. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The role that the length and thickness of a stem plays in the grading of cut roses is explained in terms of ensuring market acceptability. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The necessity to attain a uniformity of flower size when bunching cut roses is explained in respect of the influence that this has on the grading. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The role that leaf quality plays in the grading process is explained in terms of the perception of quality for the overall plant. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The importance of identifying disease damage on stems and flowers is explained in respect of the influence that the presence of these have on the grading. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
The necessity of identifying any mechanical damage that has been effected to stems and flowers is explained in respect of the influence that this has on the grading. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
The importance of identifying any chemical damage on stems and flowers is explained in respect of the influence that this has on the grading. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
The necessity to apply uniformity during the grading process is explained in terms of ensuring that the maximum value is gained for the cut rose harvest at the specific market. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
Embedded knowledge is reflected in the Assessment Criteria for each specific outcome and must be assed in its own right, through oral and written evidence. Observation cannot be the only assessment. |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
The learner is able to identify and solve problems in which responses display that responsible decisions using critical and creative thinking have been made by:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
The learner is able to work effectively with others as a member of a team, group, organisation or communities by:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
The learner is able to organise and manage oneself and one's activities responsibly and effectively by:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
The learner is able to collect, organise and critically evaluate information by:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
The learner is able to communicate effectively using visual, mathematical and/or language skills in the modes of oral and/or written presentation by:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
The learner is able to use science and technology effectively and critically, showing responsibility towards the environment and health of others by:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
The learner is able to demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of related systems by recognizing that problem-solving contexts do not exist in isolation:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING |
The learner is able to contribute to the full personal development of themselves and the social and economic development of the society at large:
|
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
N/A |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Elective | 66589 | National Certificate: Horticulture | Level 2 | NQF Level 02 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | AgriSETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |