All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Plan for school development |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
260237 | Plan for school development | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Education Management and Leadership | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 05 - Education, Training and Development | Schooling | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | 8 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
Learners credited with this Unit Standard will acquire the competencies to plan for school development so that the school has both strategic direction and a plan to achieve its goal. The school development plan (SDP) is a critical instrument that helps the school to know its current status and to plan how it will achieve what it hopes to in three years.
Learners credited with this Unit Standard are capable of: |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
This Unit Standard is for all SGB members. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Conduct an environmental scan of the school. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The purpose of the vision and mission of the school is explained and these two aspects are developed and reviewed to ensure that they are consistent with the Constitution of the country. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
An analysis is conducted to elaborate on the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats to the school. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
The methods to perform the analysis could include SWOT analysis, Force-field analysis, situational analysis. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Areas that need to be developed are identified and elaborated on so that they can be prioritised in terms of the focus areas of Whole School Evaluation (WSE). |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
An environmental scan of the school is conducted in collaboration with all stakeholders. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Develop a plan to improve the school. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Goals for school development are determined through collaboration with stakeholders and aligned to the vision, mission and values of the school. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Goals should be SMART, that is, specific, measurable, agreed, realistic and time-bound. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Specific actions to achieve each goal are identified and explained so that there is no ambiguity about the manner in which the improvement will be achieved. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
A school development plan is drafted using the analysis, identified goals and specific actions to achieve the goals. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
A risk management analysis is conducted on the school development plan and a contingency plan is prepared for any eventuality. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Stakeholders are involved in the development of the plan to ensure 'buy-in' and ownership through participation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
The influence of the SDP on the school's budget is explored and assessed to ensure that there is correlation between these two aspects. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Implement the school development plan. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The school improvement plan (SIP) is explained to emphasise how it can be used to achieve the SDP. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
The school improvement plan is developed together with the budget on an annual basis and it is in accordance with the school development plan, which is based on a three-year cycle. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Tasks and responsibilities are allocated to ensure progress and accountability. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Performance standards are developed to ensure consistency across the system and to maintain the expected quality of service delivery. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Resources identified in the plan are allocated so that implementation is not affected negatively. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Resources are both human and material. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
A communication plan is developed to ensure that all the stakeholders are kept informed about developments during the implementation of the plan. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Monitor and evaluate the school development plan. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Monitoring mechanisms and tools are developed and implemented to assist in evaluation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Regular feedback meetings are conducted to evaluate the progress against the plan. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Corrective measures are applied to ensure effective implementation, where necessary. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The importance of keeping detailed records during implementation is explained in terms of facilitating the final evaluation of the SDP and report-back to stakeholders. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identify and solve problems in which responses display that responsible decisions using critical and creative thinking have been made when:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Work effectively with others as a member of a team, group, organisation, community to:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organise and manage oneself and one's activities responsively and effectively when:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collect, analyse, organise and critically evaluate information to:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicate effectively using visual, mathematical and/or language skills in the modes of oral and/or written presentation to:
|
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
N/A |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Elective | 57712 | Further Education and Training Certificate: Generic Management | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
1. | AFRICA COMPETENCY DEVELOPMENT (PTY) LTD |
2. | Compass Academy of Learning |
3. | OPELONG BUSINESS INSTITUTE (PT |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |