All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Customise an anti-corruption strategy at operational level for a Public Sector Department |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
243264 | Customise an anti-corruption strategy at operational level for a Public Sector Department | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Public Administration and Management | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 03 - Business, Commerce and Management Studies | Public Administration | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 5 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
This Unit Standard is intended for learners in the Public Sector who work in anti-corruption units and who are responsible for the operationalisation of a Departmental specific anti-corruption strategy. It will be useful for anti-corruption practitioners.
The qualifying learner is capable of: |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
It is assumed that learners are competent in:
|
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
The typical scope of this Unit Standard is:
|
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Analyse and interpret the current National anti-corruption strategy and other relevant policy directives. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The National anti-corruption strategy and other relevant policy documents are interrogated to ascertain the core components, basic tenets and cornerstones of Government policy. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The main aspects of the anti-corruption strategy are explained with reference to the implications for implementation in a specific Department. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Contextualise the National anti-corruption strategy in a specific Public Sector Department. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The corruption risks and anti-corruption capacity in a Department are evaluated and prioritised to inform the development of a departmental strategy. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Possible ways of implementing the National anti-corruption strategy are conceptualised for a specific Department. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Develop a strategy for a selected Department within the parameters of the National anti-corruption strategy and organisational context. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
An implementation strategy is proposed that includes prevention, detection, investigation and resolution. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Approaches to address the corruption risk areas and implement the strategy are proposed with reference to resources and organisational design. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Suggest a plan to manage the implementation of a proposed Departmental strategy. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
An implementation plan is developed for a selected Public Sector Department. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
A plan is drafted to monitor and evaluate implementation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The proposal is presented to the relevant stakeholders to obtain buy-in, support and ownership. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
The learner is able to identify and solve problems in which responses show that responsible decisions using critical and creative thinking have been made in conceptualising ways of implementing the National anti-corruption strategy in a Public Sector Department. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
The learner is able to work effectively with others as a member of a team, group, organisation or community in obtaining buy-in and ownership of a proposed anti-corruption strategy will require the learner to work with a team. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
The learner is able to organise and manage him/herself and his/her activities responsibly and effectively in developing a strategy and implementation plan. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
The learner is able to collect, organise and critically evaluate information analysing, interpreting and applying National policy to a selected Department. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
The learner is able to communicate effectively using in presenting a proposed strategy to relevant stakeholders. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
The learner is able to demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of related systems by recognising that problem-solving contexts do not exist in isolation contextualising the National anti-corruption strategy in a selected Department and developing a strategy within the parameters of the National anti-corruption strategy. |
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
N/A |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 80046 | National Certificate: Tactical Road Traffic Operations | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | SAS SETA |
Elective | 57824 | Further Education and Training Certificate: Public Administration | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | PSETA |
Elective | 66869 | National Certificate: Home Affairs Services | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | PSETA |
Elective | 59258 | National Certificate: Polygraphy | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | SAS SETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
1. | AFRIC POLICING INSTITUTE |
2. | BOLTON BUSINESS COLLEGE & COMPUTER STUDIES |
3. | DAM SCHOOL OF POLICING |
4. | DAM SCHOOL OF POLICING POLOKWANE |
5. | DAM SCHOOL OF POLICING PRETORIA |
6. | Global Tech |
7. | HJN TRAINING CC |
8. | JEPPE COLLEGE OF COMMERCE AND COMPUTER |
9. | SHEPPERD ACADEMY |
10. | TELLUMAT |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |