All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Perform quality checks |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
12646 | Perform quality checks | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Primary Agriculture | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 01 - Agriculture and Nature Conservation | Primary Agriculture | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 2 | NQF Level 02 | 3 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2026-06-30 | 2029-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
The learner that have completed this Unit Standard will be able to
|
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
No prior learning is assumed to be in place |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
N/A |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Demonstrate an understanding of quality control in producing food. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. The concept "quality" explained |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Importance of quality checks on production of agricultural products explained |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Legal requirements, market requirements, health and hygiene |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Benefits of quality checks in the production processes explained |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Cost control, improved yield |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Importance explained of having a quality check procedure in place |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Perform quality checks when establishing a product/crop |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Importance explained of having quality checks when establishing a crop |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Relationship between quality of inputs in producing a crop and crop quality |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Legal requirements identified with respect to quality when establishing a crop |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Breeds, seed, variety or cultivar, equipment, hygiene |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Quality checks identified in establishing a crop |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Hygiene, breed, seed, variety or cultivar, nutrition, equipment,seedbed preparation, planting operation |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Perform quality checks in maintenance of product/crop. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Quality checks identified in the assessing process to determine the requirements of a crop |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Quality checks explained on the maintenance of a crop |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Equipment used, quality of chemicals, rate of application, storage of chemicals, hygiene and safety, nutrition, pests and diseases |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Quality checks identified on procedures to follow when maintaining a crop |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
When and how maintenance should take place |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Perform quality checks when harvesting product/crop. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Quality checks identified to be performed to assess readiness for harvesting |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Factors that indicate readiness for harvesting |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Quality checks identified on machines/equipment/materials to be used in harvesting process |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Quality checks identified on harvesting process |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Hygiene, damage to crop harvested |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
The assessment of qualifying learners against this standard should meet the requirements of established assessment principles. It will be necessary to development assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which qualifying learners are working. These activities and tools may include an appropriate combination of self-assessment and peer assessment; formative and summative assessment, portfolios and observations, etc.
The assessment should ensure that all the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge be assessed. The specific outcomes must be assessed through observation of performance. Supporting evidence should be used to prove competence of specific outcomes only when they are not clearly seen in the actual performance. Essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in its own right, through oral and written evidence. It cannot be assessed by observation only. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a qualifying learner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, then they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a qualifying learner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. Evidence of the specified critical cross-field outcomes should be found both in performance and in the essential embedded knowledge. Performance of specific outcomes must actively affirm target groups of qualifying learners, not unfairly discriminate against them. Qualifying learners should be able to justify their performance in terms of these values. 1 Anyone assessing a learner against this unit standard must be registered as an assessor with the relevant ETQA. 2. Any institution offering learning that will enable achievement of this unit standard or assessing this unit standard must be accredited as a provider with the relevant ETQA. 3 Moderation of assessment will be overseen by the relevant ETQA according to the moderation guidelines in the relevant qualification and the agreed ETQA procedures. |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
1. Market requirements
2. Competition in the market place 3. Relationship between quality of the crop and demand/price in the market place 4. Relationship between input quality and yield and input quality and crop quality 5. Importance of hygiene in farming |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
The learner will be able to identify and solve problems during the process |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
The learner will be able to organise and manage himself and his activities responsibly and effectively |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
The learner will be able to collect, analyse and critically evaluate information |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
The learner will communicate effectively when reporting on work matters |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
The learner will use science and technology effectively and critically (showing responsibility towards the environment and health of others) |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
The learner will demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of related systems |
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
Anyone assessing a learner against this unit standard must be registered as an assessor with the relevant ETQA |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
N/A |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 20288 | National Certificate: Farming | Level 2 | NQF Level 02 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | AgriSETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
1. | Hot To Go Training College and Services |
2. | In House Media Instruction |
3. | Mananthatshema Skills Dev. Centre |
4. | Setlakala Business Development |
5. | Siyasanga Training Centre |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |