All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Design and implement a set of engagement and participation processes, systems and events in support of the integrated development planning process in a municipality |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
120499 | Design and implement a set of engagement and participation processes, systems and events in support of the integrated development planning process in a municipality | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Public Administration and Management | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 03 - Business, Commerce and Management Studies | Public Administration | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 8 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2026-06-30 | 2029-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
This standard will be useful to learners working within a National or Local Government sector. This standard will enable the learner to apply strategic level development and governance competences to ensure integrated and sustainable processes, outcomes, structures, strategies, planning, implementation management, monitoring and evaluation at a municipal level. This standard will also add value to public officials who are seeking to develop a career pathway towards an accomplished integrated development planner or public sector management and administration specialist.
The qualifying learner is capable of: |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
Learners should be competent in Communication at NQF level 4 and Computer Literacy level 3. |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Identify and engage the participation of all relevant stakeholders to ensure and win support for appropriate public participation in the IDP process. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
A methodology for stakeholder identification and analysis is explained with reference to municipal specific contexts and relevant stakeholders and the importance of participation within municipal development are identified in own context. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The relevant processes, committees and forums are identified which ensure that senior management guide, and municipal officials are closely involved in municipal management and development. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Stakeholders are advised regarding the IDP process with specific reference to how it impacts on their respective contexts. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Any hindrances to the effective engagement and participation of stakeholders are identified and solutions proposed to overcome these obstacles. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Identify all the relevant mechanisms required to ensure maximum participation in IDP process. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
A communication plan is designed to ensure that the municipality, the IDP Representative Forum and IDP Unit/Municipal Mangers' Office communicate effectively and engage with a range of interested and effected parties. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The relevant processes, committees and forums are designed to ensure that political champions guide and are closely involved in municipal management and development. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Review mechanisms to regularly measure the effectiveness of communication plan are designed and implemented in line with overall IDP plan. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Problem areas in communication plan are recorded and reported for the purposes of continually enhancing the communication plan. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Establish the relevant institutional and governance arrangements and structures to develop, monitor and review the IDP. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Relevant structures, such as the IDP Representative Forum, IDP Steering Committee are set in place. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Capacity, systems and processes to enable management of and secretarial services, administrative and logistical support to, respective forums and task teams are developed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Systems and processes are designed to enable communication between the respective role players in the IDP process. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Terms of Reference and a code of conduct are drawn up for the respective IDP related structures and forums. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Capacitate the various role players to understand, effectively take part in, and implement the IDP process and strategic priorities of the municipality. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Roles and responsibilities of the various role players in the IDP process are outlined. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
A communication program is set up to raise awareness on and promote engagement with the IDP approach and process as contextualised in the specific municipality. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
A capacity building programme is set up to enable the various role players to understand and internalise the IDP principles and approach, and to effectively contribute towards. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Ward and community based planning processes and structures are developed within the context the integrated development planning process in a municipality. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
The learner must demonstrate an understanding of:
|
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identify and solve problems using critical and creative thinking processes to generate a methodology for stakeholder identification and analysis. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Work effectively with others as a member of a team, group, organisation or community to effectively ensure the commitment of stakeholders for IDP process. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organise and manage oneself and one's activities responsibly and effectively in order to effectively, timeously and proactively manage the stakeholder communications plan. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collect, analyse, organise and critically evaluate information in order to analyse stakeholder groups. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicate effectively using visual, mathematical and/or language in the modes of oral and/or written persuasion to engage stakeholder participation and implement communication plan with stakeholders. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use science and technology effectively and critically, showing responsibility to the environment and health of others in implementing communication plan. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of interrelated systems by recognising that problem-solving contexts relating to engaging the stakeholders pertinent to the success of the IDP process do not exist in isolation and that varying structures, agendas and priorities will impact on the efficacy thereof. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING |
Participate as responsible citizens in the life of local, national and global communities by ensuring that the communication plan for engaging the participation of stakeholders is implemented in a professional manner. |
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
N/A |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 50205 | National Certificate: Municipal Integrated Development Planning | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | LG SETA |
Fundamental | 58601 | National Certificate: Land Transport Planning | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2012-06-30 | LG SETA |
Elective | 58600 | National Certificate: Land Transport Planning | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2012-06-30 | LG SETA |
Elective | 67467 | National Certificate: Municipal Governance | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
1. | Amabamba Recruitment |
2. | AVAX SA 481 CC. T/A Mandisa Development Services |
3. | Brilliant Affairs |
4. | Edutraining Business College |
5. | Faranang Marketing |
6. | Giamanje TVET College |
7. | Growth Management Consulting |
8. | HDPSA |
9. | ICM t/a Institute for Career Management |
10. | IQ Skills Academy (PTY) LTD. |
11. | Jobafrik Consulting |
12. | Josmap Training Institute |
13. | Lewerb Holdings (PTY) Ltd |
14. | Madingoane and Family Construction |
15. | MANCOSA Pty (Ltd) |
16. | Mortarboard Training Solutions |
17. | MTK Corporate Solutions |
18. | Nemalale Eagles Consultancy CC |
19. | Neopeo Trading & Projects |
20. | Pachedu Skills Solutions |
21. | Pebetse Training and Consulting |
22. | PFIM Trading (Pty) Ltd |
23. | PMA Holdings (PTY ) LTD. |
24. | Progressive School of Business and Engineering (Pty) |
25. | PTDEV (Pty) Ltd |
26. | Regent Business School (Pty) Ltd t/a Regent Business School |
27. | Siza Nesu Training and Consultants |
28. | Starplex 489 cc |
29. | Tachfin Holdings |
30. | Tasc Business Consulting and Training |
31. | Tau and Tau Training Enterprises Pty Ltd |
32. | Tembe Service Providers |
33. | Transafric Consulting Pty Ltd |
34. | Tshepang Consulting & Project |
35. | Umqondo Consultancy |
36. | University of Venda |
37. | Vhutshilo Health And Training Organisation |
38. | Vukauzakhe Traiding Enterprise |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |