![]() |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Identify and respond to learners with special needs and barriers to learning |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
10294 | Identify and respond to learners with special needs and barriers to learning | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB ABET Educators | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 05 - Education, Training and Development | Adult Learning | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 10 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2026-06-30 | 2029-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
Persons credited with this unit standard will be able to:
|
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Define own role, as an ETD practitioner, in learner support. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Distinction between counselling (empathy, information, referral) as opposed to directive advice is fully explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Learners' right to ask for or receive extra-curricular support is acknowledged. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Learners' right to confidentiality is acknowledged. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Own role is defined in terms of existing skills and qualifications.
(e.g. A health worker undertaking this ETD qualification may reasonably offer advice on health issues.) |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Recognise learners who have special needs. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Special needs are identified as:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Instances when a learner's inability to match the performance of peers may be due to a learning or physical disability, are recognised. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Implications of the learning or physical disability for an individual's learning, are identified. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Eyesight problems are identified, using a simple sight test. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Instances when a learner's inability to match the performance of peers may be due to a personal problem or barrier, are recognised. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Personal problems or barriers include both situational and attitudinal barriers, e.g. substance abuse, obvious emotional distress, poor health, lack of self-confidence. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
5. Need for intervention by someone other than the educator involved, is identified. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Discuss with learner the need for further intervention. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Discussion is conducted in a manner which is sensitive, supportive, non-judgemental and confidential. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Issue of how the disability or problem may affect learning is included in the discussion. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Need for positive interventions, such as testing and referrals, is discussed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Learner is involved in joint decision-making concerning referrals. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
5. Advice is in the form of support, information and referral, rather than direct advice or instruction. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Refer learner for further intervention. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Person or agency to whom the learner should be referred, is identified. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Coherent reasons for referral are presented to the relevant person. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Reporting should include samples of work which caused concern; description of difficulties encountered in the learning situation, e.g. access for wheelchairs, identified personal problems. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Adequate information on the referral is provided to the learner in order to reduce anxiety.
(e.g. address, time, nature of referral, people involved) |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
Implement strategies to assist learner. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Willingness to help the affected learner to learn is demonstrated. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Learning environment is organised to alleviate difficulties.
(e.g. seating learner closer to the front, negotiating help from other learners) |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Recommendations from testing or referral agency are implemented. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Progress and reasons for progress or non-progress are recorded and learner has access to these at all times. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
5. Recognise when own interventions are not succeeding and refer timeously to relevant person for discussion. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
6. Success/failure of recommendations is reported to the relevant authority. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Report should include areas in which the programme was successful or was not successful. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
7. Learner's progress and the intervention strategy are re-assessed at regular intervals agreed to by the learner and practitioner |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 6 |
Investigate and respond to absenteeism and drop-out. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Unusual incidents of absenteeism or drop out of learners are identified and investigated. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
The investigation may include, but is not limited to group discussions with learners, visiting or telephoning learners, questioning friends or relatives, consulting other development agents in area. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Plausible reasons for absenteeism and dropout are presented and analysed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
The analysis indicates whether the barriers to attendance are motivational or situational and whether responses lie within or outside the learning programme. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Strategies or solutions, which are consistent with feedback received, are proposed.
(e.g. changing class times, negotiating changes with employers and trade unions, changing own facilitation style or approach) |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Support for the proposed strategy is sought from relevant people or agencies in the local context.
(e.g. consultation with employers, trade unions, transport providers, local councillors) |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identifying and solving problems in which responses display responsible decisions made using critical and creative thinking. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Working effectively with others as a member of a team, group, organisation, or community. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organising and managing oneself and one's actions responsibly and effectively. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Demonstrating and understanding of the world as a set of related system by recognising that problem solving contexts do not exist in isolation. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING |
Contributing to the full personal development of each learner and the social and economic development of the society at large. |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
This unit standard aims to be in line with the White Paper on learners with special needs, which requires that all ETD qualifications acknowledge learners with special needs.
It also aims to ensure extra-curricular support for learners. 1) This standard is aimed at facilitating an initial, restricted, sympathetic and confidential response to problems of learners in the form of a referral. It must be emphasised that ETD practitioners should never be encouraged to function as psychologists. 2) The practitioner is expected to show sensitivity to particular cultural norms and practices so that these are not confused with learning difficulties. 3) At level 5, a practitioner is not expected to design programmes for special needs. Knowledge of the relevant person within the learning organisation, or of relevant local resources is therefore required. There is some overlap between this standard and unit standard in the level 4 qualification, 'Identify and respond to learners who have special needs'. However this standard is more complex and wide ranging. Most candidates will enter the level 5 qualification from a usual FETC, without having completed the level 4 standard. Providers of training to the minority of candidates who did complete the related level 4 standard (and qualification) can make adjustments when planning curricula to avoid duplication of material covered. |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 50332 | Further Education and Training Certificate: Occupationally-Directed Education Training and Development Practices | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | ETDP SETA |
Core | 49061 | National Certificate: Master Craftsmanship (Electrical) | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | EWSETA |
Core | 20159 | National Diploma: ABET Practice | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2020-07-30 | ETDP SETA |
Core | 50333 | National Diploma: Occupationally Directed Education, Training and Development Practices | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | ETDP SETA |
Core | 20483 | National Higher Certificate: ABET Practice | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | ETDP SETA |
Core | 20485 | National First Degree: ABET Practice | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-12-31 | ETDP SETA |
Fundamental | 13740 | Certificate: Occupation-directed Education, Training and Development Practice | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Registered" |
2003-10-11 | Was ETDP SETA until Last Date for Achievement |
Elective | 50334 | National Certificate: Occupationally Directed Education Training and Development Practices | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | ETDP SETA |
Elective | 49277 | National Diploma: Braille Practice | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | ETDP SETA |
Elective | 64650 | National Diploma: Early Childhood Development | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2020-07-30 | As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual |
Elective | 49087 | National Diploma: Orientation and Mobility Practice for Blind and Partially Sighted Persons | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2009-07-29 | Was ETDP SETA until Last Date for Achievement |
Elective | 50330 | Bachelor: Occupationally Directed Education Training and Development Practices | Level 6 | NQF Level 07 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
1. | ABM COLLEGE SA (PTY) LTD |
2. | ASORIP NPC |
3. | Atlega For Woman Projects Enterprise |
4. | Azanian Community Development Pty Ltd |
5. | Boston City Campus (Pty) Ltd formerly Boston City Campus and Business College (Pty) Ltd |
6. | Corporate Safety Training Academy PTY Ltd |
7. | Dynamic Safety Solutions |
8. | FURNITURE WORLD TRAINING CENTRE |
9. | HLOSI SECURITY SOLUTIONS |
10. | HLUVUKA TRAINING AND CONSULTING |
11. | INTERNATIONAL HOSPITALITY INSTITUTE |
12. | Kenako Jwale Skills Development and Training Centre |
13. | Metro Minds |
14. | Nkosi AM Pty Ltd |
15. | PHALANE SAFETY CONSULTANT AND TRAINING PROVIDERS PTY LTD |
16. | PNJ TRAINING ACADEMY NPC |
17. | Revo Quest Consulting |
18. | The Finishing College (Pty) Lt |
19. | Training Consultant and SD College |
20. | Tshepo Hope Consulting |
21. | Ubuntu Care and Development |
22. | Vicresco (Pty) Ltd |
23. | VUWA PROJECTS |
24. | WESTERN COLLEGE FOR FURTHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |