All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Discuss development, utilisation and management of human and natural resources |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
10229 | Discuss development, utilisation and management of human and natural resources | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Democracy, Human Rights, Peace and Elections | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 07 - Human and Social Studies | People/Human-Centred Development | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
ABET Level 4 | Regular | Level 1 | NQF Level 01 | 4 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2003-07-01 | 2006-06-30 | SAQA 1043/02 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2007-06-30 | 2010-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard is replaced by: |
US ID | Unit Standard Title | Pre-2009 NQF Level | NQF Level | Credits | Replacement Status |
115483 | Explain the relationship between society, environment and development | Level 1 | NQF Level 01 | 6 |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
A candidate credited with this Unit Standard can demonstrate an ability to identify and define different resources, in different places and for different purposes; explore relationships between human development and resources; understand the impact of power relations on the distribution and utilisation of resources; design and evaluate strategies to address problems of resource allocation and management. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Show an understanding of human and natural resources. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. The concept of "resources" is defined. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Natural and human resources are identified, described and categorised. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Human resources refer to labour; Natural resources refer to: water, minerals, air, forests, land. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. The significance of resources is analysed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
The key resources relating to water, land, and labour are analysed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Factors that influence the use of resources are identified and described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Factors relate to: culture, location, economy, globalisation, technological solutions. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Discuss the development of resources. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Different ways in which resources are developed are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Describe how technology is used in different contexts to develop resources. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. The purposes for developing resources are explained and discussed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Purposes relate to the following factors: cultural, economic, ideological. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. The results of over and/or under-development of resources are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Results include factors relating to: soil erosion, desertification, economic deprivation, water shortages, the global economy. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. The impact of development of resources on human life and nature is clearly expressed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Related to Assessment 3. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Discuss the utilisation of resources. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Different ways in which resources are utilised are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Factors relate to human; labour; natural: water, land etc. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. The purposes for utilising resources are explained and discussed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Related to specific contexts, i.e. to specific communities, cultures within a specific location. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. The results of over and/or under-utilisation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Results (consequences) for/on the environment. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. The impact of utilisation of resources on human life and nature is clearly expressed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Impact relates to the changes in structure of society, people's lives and culture. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
5. Access to, and distribution of resources are considered and discussed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Factors affected include: availability of technology, education. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Discuss the management of resources. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Sustainable development of resources is defined. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Significance of sustainable development is explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
This relates to: Long term responsible use of resources; use of resources to facilitate development in such a way that the environment, future development and future generations are catered for (sustainable development). |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. The impact of good and bad management of resources is identified and described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Good and bad management are defined; examples of each is identified and applied to specific contexts. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. A reasoned judgement regarding the management of a resource is developed and expressed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Sound judgement is defined as an informed judgement/decision, made after having checked all the angles, consequences). Management of resources relates to the level of "society" as opposed to work situations. |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
This unit standard also accommodates the following developmental outcomes:
|
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identification of problems informed by decisions using critical and creative thinking. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Working effectively with an individual in a group. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organising and managing oneself and one's activities responsibly and effectively. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collecting, analysing, organising and evaluating information. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicating effectively using language skills in oral and written forms. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Using the science of technology effectively and critically. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Demonstrating an understanding of assessment as an integral component of learning. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
This unit standard has been replaced by unit standard 115483, which is "Explain the relationship between society, environment and development title", ABET Level 4, 6 credits. |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 20287 | National Certificate: Farming | Level 1 | NQF Level 01 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | AgriSETA |
Fundamental | 23253 | National Certificate (GETC): Manufacturing, Engineering and Related Activities | Level 1 | NQF Level 01 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | MERSETA |
Elective | 23193 | GETC in Ancillary Health Care | Level 1 | NQF Level 01 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Registered" |
2005-02-13 | Was HW SETA until Last Date for Achievement |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
1. | Balemi Consulting Pty Ltd |
2. | Hot To Go Training College and Services |
3. | KayDee Project Management Cc |
4. | New Heights 1082 Pty Ltd |
5. | Setlakala Business Development |
6. | Taletso FET College - Central Office |
7. | The Skills Development Hub (Pty) Ltd |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |