All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Construct and maintain infrastructure |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
8368 | Construct and maintain infrastructure | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Nature Conservation | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 01 - Agriculture and Nature Conservation | Nature Conservation | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 12 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2004-12-02 | 2007-12-02 | SAQA 1657/04 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2008-12-02 | 2011-12-02 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
The qualifying learner assessed as competent against this unit standard will be able to construct and maintain infrastructure usually associated with or found on conserved areas. This competence contributes to the effective management of the area and enhanced tourism. Achieving this unit standard will enhance the qualifying learner's employability in a numbers of sectors. |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
First Aid certificate. |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
Guides to the scope and complexity of the specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge are provided in bullet points beneath each. These are prefaced by "for example" since they are neither comprehensive nor necessarily appropriate to all contexts. Alternatives must however be comparable in scope and complexity.
These are intended only as a general guide to scope and complexity of what is required. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Maintain basic infrastructure on a protected area. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment; formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. Method of Assessment: Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. Integrated assessment: It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
A range of assessment methods should be used, including:
|
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Repair leaks, blockages, inoperable plumbing equipment (sewerage) and construct ablution facilities |
OUTCOME NOTES |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment; formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. Method of Assessment: Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. Integrated assessment: It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
A range of assessment methods should be used, including:
|
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Repair gas appliances and replace lights and fuses. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment; formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. Method of Assessment: Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. Integrated assessment: It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
A range of assessment methods should be used, including:
|
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Do basic carpentry, bricklaying, painting, paving and barricading. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment; formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. Method of Assessment: Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. Integrated assessment: It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
A range of assessment methods should be used, including:
|
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
Erect log or wooden structures. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment; formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. Method of Assessment: Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. Integrated assessment: It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
A range of assessment methods should be used, including:
|
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 6 |
Maintain wildlife fencing. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment; formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. Method of Assessment: Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. Integrated assessment: It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
A range of assessment methods should be used, including:
|
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 7 |
Do basic welding and brazing |
OUTCOME NOTES |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment; formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. Method of Assessment: Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. Integrated assessment: It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
A range of assessment methods should be used, including:
|
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 8 |
Maintain pumps, boreholes and static plants |
OUTCOME NOTES |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment; formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. Method of Assessment: Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. Integrated assessment: It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
A range of assessment methods should be used, including:
|
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
Anyone wishing to be assessed against this qualification may apply to be assessed by any assessment agency, assessor or provider institution which is accredited by the relevant ETQA. |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
The qualifying learner is able to demonstrate a basic knowledge and understanding of :
|
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Teamwork |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Self-organisation & management |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
Values:
Demonstration of the knowledge and skills outlined in this unit standard must be consistent with the principles of: Supplementary Information: Draw up an annual planner of work to be done within given budgets. Demonstrate working cleanliness & neatness for all maintenance. |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 20153 | National Certificate: Conservation: Fisheries Resource Management | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2012-06-30 | CATHSSETA |
Core | 20416 | National Certificate: Conservation: Natural Resource Management: Terrestrial | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2008-03-12 | Was CATHSSETA until Last Date for Achievement |
Core | 59949 | National Certificate: Natural Resource Management: Terrestrial | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | CATHSSETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |