All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Authorising a person to act in deceased estate |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
365191 | Authorising a person to act in deceased estate | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
Task Team - Justice Legal Training | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 08 - Law, Military Science and Security | Justice in Society | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 6 | NQF Level 06 | 5 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2026-06-30 | 2029-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
This unit standard is aimed at Assistant Masters and Examiners attached to the Office of the Master of the High Court who issue Letters of Authority and Letters of Executorship, endorse foreign Letters of Appointment and authorise the transfer of shares from deceased estates.
Learners credited with this unit standard will be able to: |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
It is assumed that the learner is competent in Communication at NQF Level 4 and has an understanding of the general principles of the law relating to persons, the family (especially maintenance and marriage property arrangements), succession, things and contract. |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
N/A |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Explain the role of the Master in authorising the administration of a deceased estate. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The need for regulation in the administration process of a deceased estate is explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The tools available to the Master in regulating the administration process of a deceased estate is explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The need for legal authority by the administrator of a deceased estate is explained. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Apply the rules regarding the jurisdiction of the Master in a deceased estate. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The rules determining the jurisdiction of the Master in a deceased estate is applied using a given set of facts. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Applications for the transfer of jurisdiction is handled according to laid down procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Problems regarding multiple jurisdictions and dual appointments are resolved. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Deal with matters relating to wills when making an appointment in a deceased estate. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The validity of a will is assessed including assessing the validity of an amendment to a will and an assessment of the competency of the persons involved in the execution of a will. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
A case where the Master refused to register and accept a will is handled according to prescribed procedures which include the need to wait with making an appointment until the prescribed time for applying to court for an order to accept the will has expired, or, when such an application has been made, the need to wait until the court case is finalised. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Deal with matters relating to intestate succession when making an appointment in a deceased estate. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The applicability of the rules of intestate succession is correctly assessed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The identity of an intestate heir is determined. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The share of an intestate beneficiary is determined. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
Issue Letters of Authority in a deceased estate. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The Master's discretion to dispense with the need to appoint an executor is exercised in an accountable and transparent manner. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The process of appointing a Masters' Representative is managed according to laid down processes and procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Appropriate directions for the administration of the deceased estate are given. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Letters of Authority are issued according to laid down process and procedure. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 6 |
Issue Letters of Executorship in a deceased estate. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The process of appointing an executor is carried out according to statute. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The correct procedure for appointing an executor dative is followed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The correct procedure for appointing an executor testamentary is followed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The need to furnish security has been determined and, when necessary, security has been asked for. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Letters of Executorship ire issued according to prescript and laid down procedures. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 7 |
Endorse foreign Letters of Appointment in a deceased estate. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The process of authorising a foreign administrator is managed efficiently and effectively. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The need to distinguish between a proclaimed state and other states must be assessed is explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Proclaimed states are identified. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The conditions set for authorising a foreign executor to administer a deceased estate in South Africa are identified using a given set of relevant facts. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The method of authorisation is identified and applied to a set of facts. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
The procedure to sign and seal foreign Letters of Appointment (with or without directions) are followed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
The endorsement is affected in the prescribed manner. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 8 |
Deal with the transfer of shares in a foreign deceased estate. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The process of authorising the transfer of shares is managed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The conditions set for the authority to transfer shares are identified. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The prescribed Letters of Authority is completed according to prescription. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 9 |
Appoint an interim curator. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The need to appoint an interim curator is assessed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The process of appointing an interim curator is managed according to laid down procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The procedure for appointing an interim curator is followed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The need to furnish security has been determined and, when necessary, security has been asked for. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Letters of Appointment are issued as prescribed. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 10 |
Appoint an assumed executor. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The right to assume an executor is determined. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The process of appointing an assumed executor is managed according to prescribed procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The correct procedure for appointing an assumed executor is followed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The need to furnish security has been determined and, when necessary, security has been asked for. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Letters of Executorship are issued as prescribed. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 11 |
Remove an executor. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The conditions set for removing an executor are discussed and applied to a set of facts. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The discretion to remove an executor is exercised correctly and in an open, accountable and transparent manner. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The process of removing the executor is managed according to laid down processes and procedures. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identifying and solving problems in which responses display that responsible decisions using critical and creative thinking have been made when:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Working effectively with others as a member of a team, group, organisation, and community during:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organising and managing oneself and one's activities responsibly and effectively when:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collecting, analysing, organising and critically evaluating information to better understand and explain:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicating effectively using visual, mathematical and/or language skills in the modes of oral and/or written persuasion when:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Demonstrating an understanding of the world as a set of related systems by recognising that problem-solving contexts do not exist in isolation when:
|
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
N/A |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Elective | 50265 | National Certificate: Family Law Practice | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | SAS SETA |
Elective | 97228 | National Certificate: Paralegal Practice | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual |
Elective | 49598 | National Diploma: Paralegal Practice | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | SAS SETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |