All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Determine field and climb performance |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
263084 | Determine field and climb performance | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Aerospace Operations | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 10 - Physical, Mathematical, Computer and Life Sciences | Physical Sciences | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | 40 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
The person credited with this Unit Standard is able to interpret ICAO type A drawings to determine the take off climb gradients as well as selecting the flap setting to optimise the climb gradient. Learners will be able to:
|
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
Learners accessing this qualification will be assumed competent in:
|
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
N/A |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Establish field length performance limits. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
ICAO Type A survey drawings are interpreted in accordance with Aircraft Flight Manual (AFM). |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Determine take off distance (TODA) available and accelerate stop distance available according to drawing interpretation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Take off distance (TODA) is adjusted in order to take into account various influences on the performances of the aircraft. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Influences include the effect of runway slope, wind component, braking configuration, brakes de-activation, runway friction coefficient and allowance for aircraft line-up on runway. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Amount of clearway used is defined and applied to TODA in order to optimise field length and obstacle clearance performance. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Amount of clearway used decided by obstacle gradient used, runway sterilisation applied and AFM limits. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Amount of stopway used is defined and applied to TODA in order to optimise field length performance. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Amount of stopway used decided by AFM limits. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
Corrected runway length and V1/VR ratio are chosen in order to determine field length limit weight. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
Field length limit weight is analysed by taking into account applicable parameters. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Applicable parameters includes corrected runway length, hot/cold thrust charts, flap setting, effective thrust, effective lift co-efficient, rate of acceleration, rate of deceleration. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Optimise take off climb performance. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Take-off climb gradients are derived in order to optimise take-off climb limit weights. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Take-off climb gradients include second, third, fourth and extended second segment. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Take-off climb gradients are checked for legal compliance in terms of legislation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Maximum and minimum level of height is checked for obstacle clearance and clean up distance. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Flap setting is selected to optimise climb gradient capability and flight path distances. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Improved climb is used to improve second segment climb capability. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Calculate and produce thrust setting tables. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Impact of pressure altitude and outside air temperature (OAT) on relevant engine performance parameters is calculated according to manufacturer's specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Thrust levels are identified and applied according to manufacturer's specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Settings are calculated within the limits specified in manufacturer's documentation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Limits includes but is not limited to case pressure, turbine inlet temperature, exhaust gas temperature, engine temperature, engine speed limits, air conditioning configuration and anti ice system operation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Limits of applicability of settings are determined according to constraints of engine certification as per manufacturer's specifications. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Ascertain missed approach climb performance. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Missed approach climb performance must calculated for the current pressure altitude and prevailing atmospheric conditions. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The differences between approach climb and landing climb are analysed in terms of gradients to be applied considering different aircraft configurations defined in the regulations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Approach and landing climb performance is calculated according to the AFM. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Calculations must include in-flight ice, leading edge ice, flap setting, thrust setting and number of engines operating as applicable. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The calculations are analysed and compared in order to determine the most restrictive climb performance to comply with regulations. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identify and solve problems which will occur during the process of determining field and climb performance. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Work effectively with others in order to obtain all the required information to determine field and climb performance. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organise and manage oneself and one's activities in such a way so as to have all the required information at hand as and when required. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collect, analyse, organise and critically evaluate information pertaining to the field and climb performance of an aircraft. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use science and technology to assist in determining field and climb performance. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of related systems where inaccurate calculations can have a negative impact on the safety of an aircraft. |
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
Glossary of terms:
|
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 66109 | National Diploma: Aircraft Performance Engineering | Level 6 | NQF Level 06 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2016-12-31 | TETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |