All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Manage area integrity |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
253964 | Manage area integrity | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Nature Conservation | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 01 - Agriculture and Nature Conservation | Nature Conservation | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 12 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2026-06-30 | 2029-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard replaces: |
US ID | Unit Standard Title | Pre-2009 NQF Level | NQF Level | Credits | Replacement Status |
8365 | Manage area integrity | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 12 |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
The unit standard is aimed at individuals involved in the planning, implementation of and participation in area integrity practices. The competencies gained against this standard contributes to the protection of the natural resources for the benefit of future generations and in so doing provides an environment in which economic activities are viable.
The qualifying learner will be able to: |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
It is assumed that the learner is competent in Communication and Mathematical Literacy at NQF Level 4. |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
N/A |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Monitor animal and plant species in the field. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Species to be monitored are determined so as to identify areas of vulnerability. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Information is collected from field patrols in order to record/plot sightings of identified species. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Collected Information is consolidated and recorded in the prescribed manner. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The quality of data recorded is controlled in order to ensure accuracy. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Establish good working relationships with local communities. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
An explanation is given of why it is necessary to establish good working relationships with local communities, and good community relations are evident in actual contacts. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The types of skills that may be required, and that could be used, to establish good working relationships, are listed, with reference to the purpose accomplished by each, and these skills are evident in actual contacts. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Communication, participation with communities, co-management of projects, understanding of community structures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
A plan is devised for establishing a working relationship with any given community in the relevant area, and this plan is followed in practice. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Maintain the ecological integrity and biodiversity of an area. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
An explanation is given of the Baseline Study and Essential Elements of Information (EEI) that contribute to the development of an area integrity plan. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The importance of the Essential Elements of Information (EEI) that contribute to the development of an area integrity plan is explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The Essential Elements of Information (EEI) that contribute to the development of an area integrity plan is listed as it applies to the operational area. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Patrols conducted, data trends, illegal activities, spoor reports, poachers and poaching, social impacts, social practices. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
A procedure on the recruitment, handling, remuneration, and protection of informers in order to contribute to maintaining area integrity is compiled. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
A working knowledge is demonstrated of the various types of patrols and their strategic value in order to contribute to maintaining area integrity. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Building relationships with communities, law enforcement, ecological monitoring. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
Effective patrols are conducted in practice. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
A plan is developed that utilises all the above Essential Elements of Information that inform the maintenance of the integrity of an area. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
The plan is followed in practice during the course of patrols and other duties as it applies to the maintaining of the ecological integrity of the area. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Identify potential ecological impacts as they are manifest in the wild environment. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
During the course of practical workplace field duties, sources of ecological degradation are identified in terms of their potential ecological impact. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
In terms of over grazing, soil erosion due to roads, bush encroachment, 4X4 use on dune vegetation, human interference with bird and turtle nesting sites, urban impacts/fringe effect, eutrophication, etc. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The purpose and principles of Integrated Environmental Management are explained in terms of planning, implementation and management of environmental development projects, with reference to examples encountered during the course of field duties. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
Design and implement a security plan. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The term "Intensive Protection Zone" (IPZ) is explained in the context of nature conservation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Fences, guard posts, observation posts, listening posts, night patrols, natural barriers, well trained wildlife guards, larger wildlife reserve. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The purpose of "Intensive Protection Zones" (IPZs) in the context of Nature Conservation is explained with reference to field examples. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
A practical SWOT Analysis, based on appropriate field research, is undertaken for an identified threatened species in a predetermined area or areas. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
A Security Plan is drawn up. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
IPZ security set-up, addressing all areas highlighted by the SWOT analysis, collection of relevant information in the field and from other sources, appropriate interpretation and assessment of information collected, changing operational circumstances derived largely from field experience, Working within the context of operational area integrity. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
A project plan is provided in the context of the Security Plan implementation. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Self-organisation and management:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Information evaluation:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use of science and technology:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Inter-relatedness of systems:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING |
Responsible citizenship:
|
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
This unit standard replaces unit standard 8365, "Manage area integrity", Level 5, 12 credits.
Demonstration of the knowledge and skills outlined in this unit standard must be consistent with the principles of: |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 59949 | National Certificate: Natural Resource Management: Terrestrial | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | CATHSSETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |