All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Demonstrate knowledge of good agricultural practices for the production of export quality perishable produce |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
252169 | Demonstrate knowledge of good agricultural practices for the production of export quality perishable produce | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Secondary Agriculture: Processing | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 01 - Agriculture and Nature Conservation | Secondary Agriculture | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | 10 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2026-06-30 | 2029-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
A person credited with this unit standard will be able to:
|
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
N/A |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Describe the particular planning and agricultural practices that facilitate the production of export quality crops. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
The planning and agricultural practices include but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The importance that aspect selection plays in the choice of an area for cultivation is explained and the influence that this may have on ultimate production levels is described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The role that sampling and analysis of the soil plays in production planning and achievement of good yields is indicated. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The preparation and soil enhancement practices that ensure the most favourable tilth and conditions for planting and growth are detailed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The planting density and techniques that will assist in achieving the desired production levels are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The necessity of tailoring a fertilisation programme to suit the crop requirements is explained and the methods of planning the programme are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
The role that irrigation scheduling plays in ensuring that optimum yields are achieved is indicated and the components of an efficient irrigation programme are detailed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
The importance of scheduling a pest control programme is indicated and the advantages and disadvantages of using chemical or biological control measures are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
The necessity to take cognisance of residual efficacy periods of the various chemical control substances is explained and the methods to formulate a safe application programme are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 9 |
The role that plant manipulations play in achieving optimum yields of quality produce is related and the various techniques that are employed are listed and explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
The techniques include, but are not limited to:
|
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Identify the pre-harvest preparations and enhancements that are necessary to achieve quality produce. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Preparation and enhancements include but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The objectives of flower and fruit thinning are explained and the various methods that are used to achieve this are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
The thinning methods include, but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The reasons for pruning are indicated and the types of pruning techniques that are used to achieve these objectives are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
The reasons and techniques include, but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The reasons why an irrigation programme must be adjusted to compensate for the precipitation received from rainfall, are explained and the methods of modifying the watering schedules are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The benefits of using chemical enhancing agents are detailed and the importance of correctly timing their application, is explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
The benefits include, but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The objectives of utilising cosmetic interventions in the latter stages of the pre-harvest period are explained and the various procedures that are performed, are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
The interventions include, but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
The reasons why a crop's maturation may be manipulated, are indicated and the methods that are employed to achieve this are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
The manipulations include, but are not limited to:
|
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Describe how to determine a harvesting window and the harvesting practices that should be used to maintain the quality of the produce. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Includes but is not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The factors that must be considered when determining the harvesting window are indicated and the effects that each has on the timing of the harvest are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
The factors include, but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The necessity for conducting maturity index testing to determine the most favourable harvesting timing is explained and the methods to perform these tests are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
The tests include, but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The various techniques that are utilised for harvesting perishable produce are indicated and the particular produce types that are suited to these methods are detailed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
The harvesting techniques include, but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The importance of preserving the structural integrity of produce through the harvesting and packing processes is explained and the handling and packing procedures that must be employed, are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
The handling and packing includes, but is not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The reasons why sensitive products should not be stored in close proximity with each other is explained and examples of these are listed. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Indicate the best practices for post harvest transport, storage and treatment of perishable produce. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Includes but is not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The necessity of maintaining food safety through all post harvest handling procedures is explained and the possible areas where contamination may occur, including the preventative measures to avoid contamination, are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
The procedures include, but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The potential hazards that can occur in transporting produce from the lands are detailed and the procedures that must be followed to prevent in transit damages, are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The various destinations to which the harvested produce may be transported are listed and the protection that must be provided for the produce is explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
The destinations include, but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The objectives of conducting post harvest treatment on perishable produce are indicated and the various methods that may be utilised, are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
The treatments include, but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The post harvest storage facilities that must be provided are indicated and the conditions, in which the produce must be stored, are described. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
The assessment of qualifying learners against this standard should meet the requirements of established principles. Practical assessment activities will be used, which are appropriate to the contents in which qualifying learners are working. These activities will include an appropriate combination of self and peer assessment, practical and oral assessments, observations etc. The assessment should ensure that all the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge be assessed. The specific outcomes must be assessed in its own right, through oral and practical evidence. It cannot be assessed by observation only. The specific outcomes and essential knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a qualifying learner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge, but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, then they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a learner is able to perform specific outcomes, but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. Evidence of the specified critical cross-field outcomes should be found, both in performance and in the essential embedded knowledge. Performance of specific outcomes must actively affirm target groups of qualifying learners, not unfairly discriminate against them. Qualifying learners should be able to ustify their performance in terms of these values. |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
Embedded knowledge is reflected in the assessment criteria for each specific outcome and must be assed in its own right, through oral and written evidence. Observation cannot be the only assessment. |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
The learner is able to identify and solve problems in which responses display that responsible decisions using critical and creative thinking have been made by:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
The learner is able to work effectively with others as a member of a team, group, organisation or communities by:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
The learner is able to organise and manage oneself and one's activities responsibly and effectively by:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
The learner is able to collect, organise and critically evaluate information by:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
The learner is able to communicate effectively using visual, mathematical and/or language skills in the modes of oral and/or written presentation by:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
The learner is able to use science and technology effectively and critically, showing responsibility towards the environment and health of others by:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
The learner is able to demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of related systems by recognizing that problem-solving contexts do not exist in isolation.
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING |
The learner is able to contribute to the full personal development of themselves and the social and economic development of the society at large.
|
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
Assessors must:
|
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
The Learner:
At this level the communication/reporting of issues arising in the workplace, is embedded in the specific outcomes and the related assessment criteria. It is understood that, due to the nature of the work environment and the skills level of the Learner, that the aspects of teamwork form an integral part of the necessary specific outcomes and related assessment criteria. The points included under the notes, should be included when the qualifying Learners are being assessed. |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Elective | 58350 | Further Education and Training Certificate: Perishable Produce Exportation | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | AgriSETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |