All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Demonstrate an understanding of forensic ballistics examination techniques |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
244160 | Demonstrate an understanding of forensic ballistics examination techniques | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Forensic Science | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 08 - Law, Military Science and Security | Safety in Society | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 8 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2026-06-30 | 2029-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
The purpose of this Unit Standard is to provide the learner with a background to the underlying principles, methodologies and scientific techniques applied in the field of forensic ballistics. On completion of this unit standard the learner will be able to understand the elementary principles of forensic ballistics examinations.
The learner will understand elementary concepts of firearm, bullet and cartridge identification, individualization and examination as well as impression mark identification and the restoration of obliterated numbers on metals. The learner will have an understanding of the different techniques and methodologies underlying the different forensic ballistic examination approaches and will know what equipment is needed to perform forensic ballistics examinations. A person credited with this unit standard will be able to: |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
N/A |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Explain the elementary concepts of firearm identification, individualization and examination. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Rifling methods and class characteristics are explained in terms of its transfer to bullet surfaces. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Rifling methods refer to but are not limited to:
Class characteristics refer to pre-manufacture firearm blue prints. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The elementary concepts of striation matching are explained in terms of firearm identification. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Elementary concepts of striation matching refer to but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Probability theories are explained in the mathematical proof of firearm identification. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Striation matches refer to but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Shot range and distance determination methodologies are explained in context to forensic firearm examinations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Shot range and distance methodologies refer to but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Methods for determining gun handling are explained in context to forensic firearm examinations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
The influence of firearm manufacture on firearm identification and individualization is explained by using examples. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
Factors influencing identification and individualization of firearms are explained in given situations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Factors refer to but are not limited to:
|
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Explain the identification and comparison of bullets. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The role of bullet characteristics is explained in forensic firearm identification examinations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Bullet characteristics refer to but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Recovery of fired bullets is explained in firearm identification methods. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The role of microscopes in forensic identification of bullet types is explained. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Explain the identification and comparison of cartridges according to forensic ballistics examination principles. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Types of marks on cartridge cases are explained in terms of the firearm component. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Types of marks refer to but are not limited to:
Firearm component here refer to but are not limited to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The role of cartridge case characteristics is explained in forensic firearm identification examinations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Cartridge case characteristics refer to but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Comparison methodologies for the identification of cartridges are explained in context to forensic ballistics examinations. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Identify equipment used for the identification and comparison of ballistic impressions based on its purpose and function. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Tools and instruments used in firearms identification are listed according to their purpose and use. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Tools and instruments refer to but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Elementary comparison microscope methodology is explained in terms of its use in forensic ballistic comparisons. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Elementary comparison microscope methodology here refers to but is not limited to:
|
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
Explain the identification and individualization of tool marks. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Tool marks are characterized according to type and causing factors in context to forensic ballistics examination principles. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Tool marks refers to but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Tool mark examination techniques are explained in terms of the evidential value in forensic examinations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Tool mark examination techniques refer to but are not limited to:
|
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 6 |
Explain the restoration of obliterated numbers on metals through the electro magnetic process. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The etching process is explained according to its purpose in forensic investigations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The different phases of the etching process are described in context to forensic investigations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The etching process methodology is explained in terms of its application in forensic investigations. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identify and solve problems in which responses display that responsible decisions, using critical thinking, have been made. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Work effectively with others as a member of a team, group, organisation or community. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organise and manage oneself and one's activities responsibly and effectively. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collect, analyse, organise and critically evaluate information. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicate effectively using visual, mathematical, and/or language skills in the modes of written and/or oral presentation. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use science and technology effectively and critically, show responsibility towards the environment and the health of others. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of related systems by recognising that problem-solving contexts do not exist in isolation. |
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
Glossary of Terminology:
> Internal ballistics. > External ballistics. > Intermediate ballistics. > Terminal ballistics. > Tool marks. or |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Elective | 57651 | National Certificate: Forensic Science | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | SAS SETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |