All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Negotiate agreements in simple to moderately complex situations |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
243818 | Negotiate agreements in simple to moderately complex situations | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Project Management | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 03 - Business, Commerce and Management Studies | Project Management | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular-Fundamental | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 4 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2026-06-30 | 2029-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
Learners credited with this unit standard will be able to describe the characteristics and the process of successful negotiations. Learners will be able to conduct negotiations, identify and overcome difficulties during a negotiation and finalise agreements for a simple to moderately complex project. They will also be able to communicate the outcome of the negotiations to all relevant stakeholders. |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
It is assumed that learners are competent in:
|
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
Simple to moderately complex project can be defined as projects that have:
Other terminology used in this unit standard: > The inclusion of implementation details. > Assignment of and responsibilities (including monitoring). > A feasible time framework. > Addressing identified issues. > Reflecting the commitment of each party ensuring final agreement with regard to identified issues is signed by identified stakeholders. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Demonstrate an understanding of negotiation concepts. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Situations that require negotiation skills are described with examples. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Alternative process models for negotiation are compared using examples. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Types of negotiation are identified and described with examples of their application in a particular sector. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Negotiation styles are identified and listed with examples. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Styles would include but are not limited to: forcing/adversarial, accommodating, compromising, collaborative/
non-adversarial. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Factors that influence negotiation are described with examples that occur in a specific business environment. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
Key characteristics of a successful negotiator are described with examples. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Develop a strategy to achieve successful negotiations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Situations and/or issues requiring negotiation are identified and prioritised according to a specific business environment. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Potential stakeholders in the negotiation are identified and profiled in accordance with their position to negotiation subject. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Profile may include but is not limited to attitude, involvement, benefit, role, authority. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Alternative negotiation strategy and structures are identified and one is selected in accordance with needs and best fit for its purpose. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
The negotiation strategies include at least three contemporary strategies such as distributive, integrated, principled, interest-based and target-specific bargaining. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Conduct negotiations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Negotiations are prepared for in accordance with business needs and in line with organisational procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Preparation may include but is not limited to any of identifying and informing stakeholders and/or participants; obtaining agreement on position to negotiate from constituency, information gathered, logistical arrangements made. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Behaviour and conduct during negotiations are aligned with the selected negotiation strategy and tactics. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Negotiations are conducted within the mandate received and in line with organisational standards and procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Negotiated outcomes are clearly presented, explained and motivated to stakeholders and constituency. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Appropriate action is initiated to obtain an amended mandate if required in accordance with organisational standards and procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
Proceedings and interim outcomes are recorded in the required format for feedback purposes. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Identify and overcome difficulties and conflict during negotiations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Potential issues or areas for conflict are identified, recorded and notified so that they allow timely resolution. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Symptoms of conflict are identified and root causes determined using recognised techniques. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Appropriate conflict resolution methods and techniques are identified, selected and applied to solve the problem. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
Finalise and communicate the agreement. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Negotiated agreements are recorded in required format using industry terminology and in accordance with organisational standards and procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The final written agreement is distributed within the required time frame and format and is explained to all constituents and stakeholders. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identify and solve problems, monitoring all problems occurring within the negotiation process. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Work effectively with others whilst preparing for and during negotiation. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organise and manage oneself and one's activities whilst maintaining fairness and transparency throughout the process of negotiation. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collect and organise information when preparing to enter into negotiations. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicate effectively whilst negotiating and when reporting results or progress on a negotiation. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use science and technology in the gathering of information and for reporting on the results of the negotiation. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of related systems where the impact of poor negotiation could lead to conflict. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING |
In order to contribute to the full personal development of each learner and the social and economic development of society at large, it must be the intention underlying any programme of learning to make an individual aware of the importance of reflecting on and exploring a variety of strategies to learn more effectively and develop effective negotiation skills and tactics. |
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
N/A |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 58309 | National Diploma: Project Management | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | SERVICES |
Core | 73129 | National Diploma: Public Relations Practice | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | SERVICES |
Elective | 61529 | National Certificate: Loss Adjusting | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | INSETA |
Elective | 64330 | National Certificate: Mission Corporate Services Management | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2020-07-30 | PSETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |