All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Monitor machining process, interpret statistical process control charts, and rectify production problems |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
243025 | Monitor machining process, interpret statistical process control charts, and rectify production problems | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Manufacturing and Assembly Processes | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 06 - Manufacturing, Engineering and Technology | Manufacturing and Assembly | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 3 | NQF Level 03 | 7 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
This unit standard reflects the skills required to:
It also reflects the understanding of: This unit standard would be assessed in the context of: The skills, knowledge and values reflected in this unit standard form part of the Exit Level Outcomes required for the National Certificate in CNC Production Machining: NQF Level 3. |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
The following competencies are assumed:
In addition, learners are assumed to have relevant skills at NQF Level 2 in the context of CNC machining processes using computer numeric controlled equipment. This includes and understanding of quality assurance processes and statistical process control plots. This assumption forms the basis for the allocation of credits for this unit standard. If a learner does not have such experience or qualifications, the learning time will be increased. The allocation of credits is also based on the assumption that the learner will be following a learning programme which integrates the required unit standards. |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
The scope and level of this unit standard is indicated by range statements related to the specific outcomes.
Rectify means implementing remedial actions and monitoring and evaluating the effect of changes and also includes reporting the problem where it is beyond the limits of the learner's authority. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Describe and explain the purpose of quality processes and the relationship to work activities. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Quality processes include upper and lower process limits, critical characteristics, principles of statistical process control, measuring and checking methods, consequences of poor quality products. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Response to questioning indicates an understanding of the theoretical principles of statistical process control and the identification of out-of-control production conditions. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Assessment criterion type: Understanding confirmed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Key concepts include:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Response to questioning indicates an understanding of the common faults, their causes and how they can be rectified. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Assessment criterion type: Understanding confirmed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
A problem solving technique can be described and applied and the purpose of such techniques can be explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Assessment criterion type: Understanding confirmed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
The purpose of this assessment criterion is to establish if the learner can apply a systematic approach to problem solving. Problem solving techniques include any tool to systemise the problem solving process, eg fishbone diagrams, flowcharts, root cause analysis. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Review statistical information and identify unstable processes. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Unstable processes, trends and error conditions are identified and a response to the problem is determined. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Assessment criterion type: Results achieved. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Downtime and production losses are minimised. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Assessment criterion type: Indicator. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The learner's evidence shows that he/she has identified and interpreted a range of different unstable process conditions, trends and error conditions. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Assessment criterion type: Indicator. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
A consistent and systematic approach is used to identify and determine a response to the problem. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Assessment criterion type: Indicator. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Response includes choices such as stopping the machining process, referring a problem to the appropriate person or making running adjustments. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Analyse the process conditions in unstable processes and determine the cause of the problem. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The underlying cause of the problem is identified and recorded. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Assessment criterion type: Indicator. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The learner's evidence shows that he/she has identified and interpreted a range of different unstable process conditions, trends and error conditions. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Assessment criterion type: Indicator. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
A consistent and systematic approach is used to identify problems and develop a solution. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Assessment criterion type: Indicator. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Implement remedial action, monitor and evaluate the effect of changes and record and report actions. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Implement remedial action includes reporting the problem when the solution exceeds the person's authority or resources. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Remedial actions are appropriate to the cause and result in an ongoing resolution of the problem. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
All remedial actions are carried out with due care for the equipment, the materials and the quality of the final product. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Assessment criterion type: Indicator. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Remedial actions are communicated effectively and timeously to the appropriate person. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Assessment criterion type: Results achieved. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Records are accurate and processed in line with organisational standards. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Assessment criterion type: Indicator. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
Monitor the production process and ensure that it runs smoothly. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Downtime and production losses are minimised. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Assessment criterion type: Results achieved. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The learner's evidence shows that he/she can anticipate problems. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Assessment criterion type: Indicator. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Problems are restricted to common manufacturing problems related to the process or the product. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
A consistent and systematic approach is used to check the various aspects of the process. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Assessment criterion type: Indicator. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Aspects of the process include equipment conditions, tooling and associated components, lubricant levels, stock levels and type of stock. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
Assessment will be governed by the policies and guidelines of a relevant Education and Training Quality Assurance body (ETQA), which has jurisdiction over this field of learning. The policies and procedures of the relevant ETQA will also determine:
Any institution or company which offers learning to achieve the purpose of this unit standard must be accredited as a provider through the relevant ETQA. The integrated assessment should be based on a summative assessment guide. The guide will specify how the assessor will assess different aspects of the performance and will include: Assessment of competence for this unit standard is based on experience acquired by the learner in the workplace, within the particular machining context. The assessment process should cover the explicit tasks required for the unit standard as well as the understanding of the concepts and principles that underpin the process of monitoring the machining process, interpreting statistical process control charts, and rectifying production problems. Assessment criteria of the type 'Results achieved' should be regarded as critical to the achievement of this unit standard. The assessment process should also establish how the learning process has advanced the Critical Cross-field Outcomes. The learner may choose in which language he/she wants to be assessed. This should be established as part of a process of preparing the learner for assessment and familiarising the learner with the approach being taken. Assessors should also evaluate evidence that the learner has been performing consistently over a period of time. The assessment for this unit standard can be done in conjunction with the assessment of other unit standards related to a qualification, and in conjunction with the assessment for the qualification as a whole. |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
The following items reflect the type of knowledge that the assessor will evaluate.
Names & functions of: Purpose of: Attributes, descriptions, characteristics and properties: Processes and events: Causes and effects, implications of: Procedures and techniques: Sensory cues: Regulations, legislation, agreements, policies, standards: Theory: rules, principles, laws: Relationships, systems: |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identify and solve problems.
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Work effectively with others.
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organise and manage myself and my activities.
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collect, analyse, organise and critically evaluate information.
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicate effectively.
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use science and technology effectively and critically.
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of related systems.
|
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
N/A |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 71989 | National Certificate: Automotive Components: Manufacturing and Assembly | Level 3 | NQF Level 03 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | MERSETA |
Core | 57877 | National Certificate: CNC Production Machining | Level 3 | NQF Level 03 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | MERSETA |
Core | 58779 | Further Education and Training Certificate: Production Technology | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | MERSETA |
Elective | 91926 | National Certificate: Mechanical Engineering: Machining and Tooling | Level 3 | NQF Level 03 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual |
Elective | 79666 | National Certificate: Metal and Engineering Manufacturing Processes | Level 3 | NQF Level 03 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | MERSETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |