All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Manage the prevention of crime |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
230029 | Manage the prevention of crime | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Visible Policing | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 08 - Law, Military Science and Security | Safety in Society | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | 12 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
This unit standard will enable managers within the Safety in Society environment to improve professionalism and enhance the quality of service delivery. A learner acquiring this unit standard will be able to manage the process of crime prevention.
A person credited with this unit standard is able to: |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
In this unit standard where reference is made to crime prevention it is with the understanding that certain fields of study prefer the terms: "reduction of crime" rather than "prevention of crime". Within this unit standard prevention of crime also refers to the detection of crime within a community service centre context.
The range covers the role and purpose of police management in the context of safety in the South African society. The range includes practice and culture of safety in society particularly within the policing discipline, the current regulatory framework, the main activities of police management, and stakeholders in and outside of South Africa. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Develop and design operational plans. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The current legislation, departmental policies and prescripts are integrated in the planning process. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Joint and integrated planning processes are conducted with all relevant identified roleplayers. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The planning process must allow for a common and shared understanding of the crime threat to be developed by roleplayers. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Objectives are set to meet the goals and scope of the crime prevention strategy. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Role clarification, assignment of responsibilities and resource allocation are taken into account when designing an operational plan. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
Measurable indicators for success are identified in order to support the operational plan. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
Contingency plans are designed within the scope of the operational plan. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Contingencies include but are not limited to: Public order disturbance, emergency situations and disasters, unforeseen weather conditions. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
Aspects of authorisation are taken into account when designing the operational plan. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Authorisation refers to but is not limited to authorisation needed for: cordon and search, roadblock, warrants. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Execute interventions. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Interventions include but are not limited to operations, events, projects and programmes. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The availability of resources and logistics is assessed to support the execution of interventions. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Responsibilities and execution of tasks are allocated and delegated taking into account available resources. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The process of establishment of an operational centre for command and control is analysed in accordance with given objectives. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Operational Centres refer to but is not limited to: Joint Operational Command Centre (JOC), Venue Operational Centre (VOC), National Operational Centre, Area Operational Centre. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The implementation of interventions is assessed in accordance with the objectives of the plan. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Interventions refer to but are not limited to: regular visits and close monitoring of project team and operational members. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Possible problems encountered during interventions are identified in order to facilitate their resolution by using information in the contingency plan. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
Situation reports are consolidated for debriefing purposes. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
Debriefing methods are examined in order to select one to establish the effectiveness of an intervention. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Assess the impact of projects, programmes and operations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The outcomes of an operation are compared to the set indicators and criteria of success in order to determine the success or failure of the operation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
An analytical report is generated using information gathered at an operational centre during the execution of the special operations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Debriefing of the command structure is assessed to ensure that the integrated plan is shared and the process is managed for post-mortem purposes. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
A review is undertaken of the plan for quality assurance and cost benefit analysis and reflects recommendation for continuous improvement. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
A final report is developed in order to be submitted to the next command level and reflects successes, failures and best practices for future implementation purposes. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
> Explain the difference between a special operation and normal duties. > Various law enforcement organisations and structures. > Functional structures within enforcement organisations. > Other governmental and non-governmental organisation structures. > Law enforcement structures and constituencies. > Stakeholders and their relation to law enforcement. > Explain the uses of communication channels. > The legislation. > Law enforcement operations. > Law enforcement operations in fulfilling mandates whilst providing a service to stakeholders. > Formats of written reports and content. > National security law enforcement concepts. > Stakeholders and their rights. > Causality of events. > Cost benefits. > The processes in providing operational planning. > Restrictions and limitations. > List all possible role-players involved in a special project / operation / disaster. > Name different types of feedback reports. > Definitions of aspects of operational resource management. > Supported and supporting operations. > Principles of logistical support. > The need for a regulatory framework (budget, acquisition and procurement principles). > Reliability. > Timeousness. > Explain the administration procedures in terms of standard operating procedures. > Explain in terms of standard operating procedures, how an operational plan should be created. > Describe in terms of standard operating procedures, how to conduct a briefing session. > Operational procedures, methods and techniques. > Procedures of law enforcement practices. > Liaison protocol. > Operational terminology. > Unique characteristics of resource management during operations. > Political, regulatory and budgetary systems. |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identifying and solving problems in which responses display that responsible decisions using critical and creative thinking have been made when:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Working effectively with others as a member of a team, group, organisation, and community during:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organising and managing oneself and one's activities responsibly and effectively when:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collecting, analysing, organising and critically evaluating information to better understand and explain:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicating effectively using visual, mathematical and/or language skills in the modes of oral and/or written persuasion when:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Using science and technology effectively and critically, showing responsibility towards the environment and health of others when:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Demonstrating an understanding of the world as a set of related systems by recognising that problem-solving contexts do not exist in isolation when:
|
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
Definitions:
|
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 61729 | National Diploma: Policing | Level 6 | NQF Level 06 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | SAS SETA |
Elective | 48865 | National Diploma: Policing | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Registered" |
2007-12-02 | Was SAS SETA until Last Date for Achievement |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
1. | AFRIC POLICING INSTITUTE |
2. | BOLTON BUSINESS COLLEGE & COMPUTER STUDIES |
3. | Chithi Holdings |
4. | CRANE INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY DURBAN |
5. | CRANE INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY MIDDLEBURG |
6. | CRANE INTERNATIONAL BURGERSFORT |
7. | DAM SCHOOL OF POLICING |
8. | DAM SCHOOL OF POLICING POLOKWANE |
9. | DAM SCHOOL OF POLICING PRETORIA |
10. | DAM TECHNICALCOLLEGE PTY TD |
11. | HJN POLOKWANE BRANCH PTY LTD |
12. | JEPPE COLLEGE OF COMMERCE AND COMPUTER |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |