|
|
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
| SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
| REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
| Optimise an industrial rubber manufacturing process |
| SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
| 13199 | Optimise an industrial rubber manufacturing process | |||
| ORIGINATOR | ||||
| SGB Manufacturing and Assembly Processes | ||||
| PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
| - | ||||
| FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
| Field 06 - Manufacturing, Engineering and Technology | Manufacturing and Assembly | |||
| ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
| Undefined | Regular | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 24 |
| REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
|
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
| LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
| 2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 | |||
| In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
| PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
| Learners who are involved in optimising industrial rubber manufacturing processes require the skills, values and knowledge reflected in this unit standard.
Qualifying learners will understand all the elements of industrial rubber manufacturing processes. They will understand how to collect and analyse results, generate optimisation plans and how this is achieved. This will include adjusting and updating operating procedures. The learning outcomes in this unit standard also contribute to the exit level outcomes required for the National Certificate in Industrial Rubber Manufacturing (Mixing, Extruding, Moulding or Calendaring) (NQF level 5) and related qualifications. |
| LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
| This unit standard has been designed as part of a progression. It is one of a series of unit standards for producing product in an industrial rubber manufacturing skills setting.
The credits allocated to this unit standard assume that a learner has already learned to: |
| UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
| The ranges as indicated under the specific outcomes determine the scope and level of this unit standard.
The learner should be able to work autonomously with no supervision and according to worksite and manufacturer specifications and occupational safety, health and environmental legislation. Work is generally, but not exclusively, carried out in a team environment. |
| Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
| SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
| Analyse production data and identify opportunities for improvement. |
| OUTCOME RANGE |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
| 1. Raw and test data is collected, grouped and summarised; deviations, opportunities, problem areas are highlighted. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
| 2. Options are listed. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
| 3. Recorded plan is available indicating objectives, steps, responsibilities, times, costs. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
| 4. Action steps are implemented by work group. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
| 5. Problems are attended to. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
| 6. Record of adjustments is available. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
| 7. Operational procedures are updated. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
| 8. Accurate reports are available. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 9 |
| Results achieved
1. Raw and test data is collected, grouped and summarised; deviations, opportunities, problem areas are highlighted 2. Options are listed 3. Recorded plan is available indicating objectives, steps, responsibilities, times, costs 4. Action steps are implemented by work group 5. Problems are attended to 6. Record of adjustments is available 7. Operational procedures are updated 8. Accurate reports are available Indicators 1. Data is 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed 1. Responding to `what if` and `why` questions related to: |
| SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
| Generate and test options to achieve improvement. |
| OUTCOME RANGE |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
| 1. Raw and test data is collected, grouped and summarised; deviations, opportunities, problem areas are highlighted. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
| 2. Options are listed. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
| 3. Recorded plan is available indicating objectives, steps, responsibilities, times, costs. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
| 4. Action steps are implemented by work group. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
| 5. Problems are attended to. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
| 6. Record of adjustments is available. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
| 7. Operational procedures are updated. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
| 8. Accurate reports are available. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 9 |
| Results achieved
1. Raw and test data is collected, grouped and summarised; deviations, opportunities, problem areas are highlighted 2. Options are listed 3. Recorded plan is available indicating objectives, steps, responsibilities, times, costs 4. Action steps are implemented by work group 5. Problems are attended to 6. Record of adjustments is available 7. Operational procedures are updated 8. Accurate reports are available Indicators 1. Data is 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed 1. Responding to `what if` and `why` questions related to: |
| SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
| Generate plan for optimisation, brief work group and implement plan. |
| OUTCOME RANGE |
| Optimisation includes improving the efficiency of the plant and process, developing skills, effective use of resources and reducing overall cost, testing the bounds of the unknown and finding new ways of creating improvement. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
| 1. Raw and test data is collected, grouped and summarised; deviations, opportunities, problem areas are highlighted. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
| 2. Options are listed. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
| 3. Recorded plan is available indicating objectives, steps, responsibilities, times, costs. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
| 4. Action steps are implemented by work group. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
| 5. Problems are attended to. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
| 6. Record of adjustments is available. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
| 7. Operational procedures are updated. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
| 8. Accurate reports are available. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 9 |
| Results achieved
1. Raw and test data is collected, grouped and summarised; deviations, opportunities, problem areas are highlighted 2. Options are listed 3. Recorded plan is available indicating objectives, steps, responsibilities, times, costs 4. Action steps are implemented by work group 5. Problems are attended to 6. Record of adjustments is available 7. Operational procedures are updated 8. Accurate reports are available Indicators 1. Data is 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed 1. Responding to `what if` and `why` questions related to: |
| SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
| Collect and evaluate results and review and adjust the optimisation process. |
| OUTCOME NOTES |
| Collect and evaluate results and review and adjust the optimisation process until objectives have been achieved. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
| 1. Raw and test data is collected, grouped and summarised; deviations, opportunities, problem areas are highlighted. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
| 2. Options are listed. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
| 3. Recorded plan is available indicating objectives, steps, responsibilities, times, costs. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
| 4. Action steps are implemented by work group. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
| 5. Problems are attended to. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
| 6. Record of adjustments is available. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
| 7. Operational procedures are updated. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
| 8. Accurate reports are available. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 9 |
| Results achieved
1. Raw and test data is collected, grouped and summarised; deviations, opportunities, problem areas are highlighted 2. Options are listed 3. Recorded plan is available indicating objectives, steps, responsibilities, times, costs 4. Action steps are implemented by work group 5. Problems are attended to 6. Record of adjustments is available 7. Operational procedures are updated 8. Accurate reports are available Indicators 1. Data is 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed 1. Responding to `what if` and `why` questions related to: |
| SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
| Adjust and update operating procedures. |
| OUTCOME RANGE |
| Operating procedures include best practices, standard operating procedures and protocols. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
| Results achieved
1. Raw and test data is collected, grouped and summarised; deviations, opportunities, problem areas are highlighted 2. Options are listed 3. Recorded plan is available indicating objectives, steps, responsibilities, times, costs 4. Action steps are implemented by work group 5. Problems are attended to 6. Record of adjustments is available 7. Operational procedures are updated 8. Accurate reports are available Indicators 1. Data is 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed 1. Responding to `what if` and `why` questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to `what if` and `why` questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
| 2. Options are listed. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
| 3. Recorded plan is available indicating objectives, steps, responsibilities, times, costs. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
| 4. Action steps are implemented by work group. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
| 5. Problems are attended to. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
| 6. Record of adjustments is available. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
| 7. Operational procedures are updated. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
| 8. Accurate reports are available. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| SPECIFIC OUTCOME 6 |
| Identify problems and take corrective action. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
| 1. Raw and test data is collected, grouped and summarised; deviations, opportunities, problem areas are highlighted. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
| 2. Options are listed. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
| 3. Recorded plan is available indicating objectives, steps, responsibilities, times, costs. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
| 4. Action steps are implemented by work group. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
| 5. Problems are attended to. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
| 6. Record of adjustments is available. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
| 7. Operational procedures are updated. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
| 8. Accurate reports are available. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 9 |
| Results achieved
1. Raw and test data is collected, grouped and summarised; deviations, opportunities, problem areas are highlighted 2. Options are listed 3. Recorded plan is available indicating objectives, steps, responsibilities, times, costs 4. Action steps are implemented by work group 5. Problems are attended to 6. Record of adjustments is available 7. Operational procedures are updated 8. Accurate reports are available Indicators 1. Data is 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed 1. Responding to `what if` and `why` questions related to: |
| SPECIFIC OUTCOME 7 |
| Explain and discuss optimising issues with workgroup and other partners. |
| OUTCOME RANGE |
| Other partners include suppliers of materials and equipment, experts and customers. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
| 1. Raw and test data is collected, grouped and summarised; deviations, opportunities, problem areas are highlighted. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
| 2. Options are listed. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
| 3. Recorded plan is available indicating objectives, steps, responsibilities, times, costs. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
| 4. Action steps are implemented by work group. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
| 5. Problems are attended to. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
| 6. Record of adjustments is available. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
| 7. Operational procedures are updated. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
| 8. Accurate reports are available. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 9 |
| Results achieved
1. Raw and test data is collected, grouped and summarised; deviations, opportunities, problem areas are highlighted 2. Options are listed 3. Recorded plan is available indicating objectives, steps, responsibilities, times, costs 4. Action steps are implemented by work group 5. Problems are attended to 6. Record of adjustments is available 7. Operational procedures are updated 8. Accurate reports are available Indicators 1. Data is 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed 1. Responding to `what if` and `why` questions related to: |
| SPECIFIC OUTCOME 8 |
| Understand the impact and the inter-relationship of changes on production quality and output. |
| OUTCOME NOTES |
| Understand the impact and the inter-relationship of changes on production quality and output and production costs. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
| 1. Raw and test data is collected, grouped and summarised; deviations, opportunities, problem areas are highlighted. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
| 2. Options are listed. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
| 3. Recorded plan is available indicating objectives, steps, responsibilities, times, costs. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
| 4. Action steps are implemented by work group. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
| 5. Problems are attended to. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
| 6. Record of adjustments is available. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
| 7. Operational procedures are updated. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
| 8. Accurate reports are available. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 9 |
| Results achieved
1. Raw and test data is collected, grouped and summarised; deviations, opportunities, problem areas are highlighted 2. Options are listed 3. Recorded plan is available indicating objectives, steps, responsibilities, times, costs 4. Action steps are implemented by work group 5. Problems are attended to 6. Record of adjustments is available 7. Operational procedures are updated 8. Accurate reports are available Indicators 1. Data is 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed 1. Responding to `what if` and `why` questions related to: |
| SPECIFIC OUTCOME 9 |
| Work safely with due care for self, fellow workers, equipment, materials and the environment. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
| 1. Raw and test data is collected, grouped and summarised; deviations, opportunities, problem areas are highlighted. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
| 2. Options are listed. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
| 3. Recorded plan is available indicating objectives, steps, responsibilities, times, costs. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
| 4. Action steps are implemented by work group. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
| 5. Problems are attended to. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
| 6. Record of adjustments is available. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
| 7. Operational procedures are updated. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
| 8. Accurate reports are available. |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
| Indicators:
1. Data is o comprehensive o organised logically and systematically o stored in an accessible way o arranged to assist others to interpret it 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed: Responding to 'what if' and 'why' questions related to: |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 9 |
| Results achieved
1. Raw and test data is collected, grouped and summarised; deviations, opportunities, problem areas are highlighted 2. Options are listed 3. Recorded plan is available indicating objectives, steps, responsibilities, times, costs 4. Action steps are implemented by work group 5. Problems are attended to 6. Record of adjustments is available 7. Operational procedures are updated 8. Accurate reports are available Indicators 1. Data is 2. Measurement units are indicated 3. Options are viable, relevant and practical 4. Plan is well structured 5. Tests are conducted methodically and consistently 6. Instructions to work group are clear and precise and their understanding of instructions is checked 7. Work is focussed and carried out safely and with an eye on preserving health and the environment 8. Results collected are accurate, comprehensive and arranged in such a way that the improvement or the lack of improvement is clear 9. Sufficient time is allowed for the effects of adjustments to be fully realised - the process maintains a steady state and unexpected consequences are allowed to become evident Understanding confirmed 1. Responding to `what if` and `why` questions related to: |
| UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
| My assessment will be governed by the policies and guidelines of the MERSETA Education and Training Quality Assuror who has jurisdiction over this field of learning. My assessor will (at the very least) be accredited and have a technical qualification in this learning area.
I can be assessed in the language of my choice although if I have to report incidents or conditions to someone else, I will be assessed on my ability to report in the language commonly used in my working environment. I will be assessed in the workplace but I can submit documents, projects, test results and assignments that were not produced in the workplace. I can be assessed against this unit standard to obtain credits or as part of an integrated assessment for a qualification. |
| UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
| 1. Purpose of:
2. Processes and events, causes and effects, implications: 3. Procedures and techniques: 4. Regulations, legislation, agreements, policies, standards: 5. Theory: rules, principles, laws: 6. Relationships, systems: |
| UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
| N/A |
| UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
| N/A |
| Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
| UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
| Identify and solve problems:
|
| UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
| Work effectively with others:
|
| UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
| Organise and manage myself and my activities:
|
| UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
| Collect, analyse, organise and critically evaluate information:
|
| UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
| Communicate effectively:
|
| UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
| Use science and technology effectively and critically:
|
| UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
| Demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of related systems:
|
| UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
| N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
| As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
| UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
| N/A |
| QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
| ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
| Core | 23260 | National Certificate: Industrial Rubber Manufacturing: Mixing OR Extruding OR Moulding OR Calendaring | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | MERSETA |
| PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
| This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
| NONE |
| All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |