All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Test and analyse rubber materials, components and products |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
12670 | Test and analyse rubber materials, components and products | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Manufacturing and Assembly Processes | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 06 - Manufacturing, Engineering and Technology | Manufacturing and Assembly | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 45 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
The skills, values and knowledge reflected in this unit standard are required by people in the field of rubber technology.
Qualifying learners are able to test rubber samples, analyse the test results and identify root causes of deviations where applicable, make recommendations to maintain and improve product quality and follow up on recommendations. Learners must demonstrate this competence in relation to product verification, product substitution, modified product, modified process and non-conformances. |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
This unit standard has been designed as part of a progression. It is one of a series of unit standards for rubber technology.
The credits allocated to this unit standard assume that a learner has already met the requirements of the National Certificate in Industrial Rubber Manufacturing NQF level 4. |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
The scope and level of this unit standard is limited to common commercial rubber applications and is determined by the ranges as indicated under the specific outcomes.
The learner should be able to work autonomously. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Evaluate the presented task. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Evaluation of the task includes assessing cost and time implications, outlining the scope of the task and output requirements.
Tasks may include testing and analysing for new product developments, new compound developments, non-conformances, process refinements. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Experimental design is determined based on evaluation of presented task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Correct sized samples are prepared for the material, and selected test 2. Test equipment prepared and set up correctly 3. Tests are performed in compliance with manufacturer specifications 4. Data captured accurately and processed correctly 5. Correct diagnosis is made 6. Documents and reports are accurate 7. Information presented in clear and understandable way 8. No delays are caused as a result of poor planning for conducting tests 9. Applicable safety, health, environmental and quality procedures are adhered to Understanding confirmed: 1. Responding to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Tests are conducted and reliability of test results confirmed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Correct sized samples are prepared for the material, and selected test 2. Test equipment prepared and set up correctly 3. Tests are performed in compliance with manufacturer specifications 4. Data captured accurately and processed correctly 5. Correct diagnosis is made 6. Documents and reports are accurate 7. Information presented in clear and understandable way 8. No delays are caused as a result of poor planning for conducting tests 9. Applicable safety, health, environmental and quality procedures are adhered to Understanding confirmed: 1. Responding to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Report on findings is generated. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Correct sized samples are prepared for the material, and selected test 2. Test equipment prepared and set up correctly 3. Tests are performed in compliance with manufacturer specifications 4. Data captured accurately and processed correctly 5. Correct diagnosis is made 6. Documents and reports are accurate 7. Information presented in clear and understandable way 8. No delays are caused as a result of poor planning for conducting tests 9. Applicable safety, health, environmental and quality procedures are adhered to Understanding confirmed: 1. Responding to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Determine experimental design. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Factors to take into account in determining experimental design include task requirements, materials, equipment, types of tests, chemical resources, test location. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Experimental design is determined based on evaluation of presented task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Correct sized samples are prepared for the material, and selected test 2. Test equipment prepared and set up correctly 3. Tests are performed in compliance with manufacturer specifications 4. Data captured accurately and processed correctly 5. Correct diagnosis is made 6. Documents and reports are accurate 7. Information presented in clear and understandable way 8. No delays are caused as a result of poor planning for conducting tests 9. Applicable safety, health, environmental and quality procedures are adhered to Understanding confirmed: 1. Responding to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Tests are conducted and reliability of test results confirmed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Correct sized samples are prepared for the material, and selected test 2. Test equipment prepared and set up correctly 3. Tests are performed in compliance with manufacturer specifications 4. Data captured accurately and processed correctly 5. Correct diagnosis is made 6. Documents and reports are accurate 7. Information presented in clear and understandable way 8. No delays are caused as a result of poor planning for conducting tests 9. Applicable safety, health, environmental and quality procedures are adhered to Understanding confirmed: 1. Responding to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Report on findings is generated. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Correct sized samples are prepared for the material, and selected test 2. Test equipment prepared and set up correctly 3. Tests are performed in compliance with manufacturer specifications 4. Data captured accurately and processed correctly 5. Correct diagnosis is made 6. Documents and reports are accurate 7. Information presented in clear and understandable way 8. No delays are caused as a result of poor planning for conducting tests 9. Applicable safety, health, environmental and quality procedures are adhered to Understanding confirmed: 1. Responding to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Select and/or prepare the required test samples. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Experimental design is determined based on evaluation of presented task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Correct sized samples are prepared for the material, and selected test 2. Test equipment prepared and set up correctly 3. Tests are performed in compliance with manufacturer specifications 4. Data captured accurately and processed correctly 5. Correct diagnosis is made 6. Documents and reports are accurate 7. Information presented in clear and understandable way 8. No delays are caused as a result of poor planning for conducting tests 9. Applicable safety, health, environmental and quality procedures are adhered to Understanding confirmed: 1. Responding to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Tests are conducted and reliability of test results confirmed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Correct sized samples are prepared for the material, and selected test 2. Test equipment prepared and set up correctly 3. Tests are performed in compliance with manufacturer specifications 4. Data captured accurately and processed correctly 5. Correct diagnosis is made 6. Documents and reports are accurate 7. Information presented in clear and understandable way 8. No delays are caused as a result of poor planning for conducting tests 9. Applicable safety, health, environmental and quality procedures are adhered to Understanding confirmed: 1. Responding to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Report on findings is generated. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Correct sized samples are prepared for the material, and selected test 2. Test equipment prepared and set up correctly 3. Tests are performed in compliance with manufacturer specifications 4. Data captured accurately and processed correctly 5. Correct diagnosis is made 6. Documents and reports are accurate 7. Information presented in clear and understandable way 8. No delays are caused as a result of poor planning for conducting tests 9. Applicable safety, health, environmental and quality procedures are adhered to Understanding confirmed: 1. Responding to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Perform the experiment. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Experimental design is determined based on evaluation of presented task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Correct sized samples are prepared for the material, and selected test 2. Test equipment prepared and set up correctly 3. Tests are performed in compliance with manufacturer specifications 4. Data captured accurately and processed correctly 5. Correct diagnosis is made 6. Documents and reports are accurate 7. Information presented in clear and understandable way 8. No delays are caused as a result of poor planning for conducting tests 9. Applicable safety, health, environmental and quality procedures are adhered to Understanding confirmed: 1. Responding to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Tests are conducted and reliability of test results confirmed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Correct sized samples are prepared for the material, and selected test 2. Test equipment prepared and set up correctly 3. Tests are performed in compliance with manufacturer specifications 4. Data captured accurately and processed correctly 5. Correct diagnosis is made 6. Documents and reports are accurate 7. Information presented in clear and understandable way 8. No delays are caused as a result of poor planning for conducting tests 9. Applicable safety, health, environmental and quality procedures are adhered to Understanding confirmed: 1. Responding to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Report on findings is generated. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Correct sized samples are prepared for the material, and selected test 2. Test equipment prepared and set up correctly 3. Tests are performed in compliance with manufacturer specifications 4. Data captured accurately and processed correctly 5. Correct diagnosis is made 6. Documents and reports are accurate 7. Information presented in clear and understandable way 8. No delays are caused as a result of poor planning for conducting tests 9. Applicable safety, health, environmental and quality procedures are adhered to Understanding confirmed: 1. Responding to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
Analyse and interpret data based on the experiment's objectives. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Experimental design is determined based on evaluation of presented task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Correct sized samples are prepared for the material, and selected test 2. Test equipment prepared and set up correctly 3. Tests are performed in compliance with manufacturer specifications 4. Data captured accurately and processed correctly 5. Correct diagnosis is made 6. Documents and reports are accurate 7. Information presented in clear and understandable way 8. No delays are caused as a result of poor planning for conducting tests 9. Applicable safety, health, environmental and quality procedures are adhered to Understanding confirmed: 1. Responding to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Tests are conducted and reliability of test results confirmed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Correct sized samples are prepared for the material, and selected test 2. Test equipment prepared and set up correctly 3. Tests are performed in compliance with manufacturer specifications 4. Data captured accurately and processed correctly 5. Correct diagnosis is made 6. Documents and reports are accurate 7. Information presented in clear and understandable way 8. No delays are caused as a result of poor planning for conducting tests 9. Applicable safety, health, environmental and quality procedures are adhered to Understanding confirmed: 1. Responding to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Report on findings is generated. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Correct sized samples are prepared for the material, and selected test 2. Test equipment prepared and set up correctly 3. Tests are performed in compliance with manufacturer specifications 4. Data captured accurately and processed correctly 5. Correct diagnosis is made 6. Documents and reports are accurate 7. Information presented in clear and understandable way 8. No delays are caused as a result of poor planning for conducting tests 9. Applicable safety, health, environmental and quality procedures are adhered to Understanding confirmed: 1. Responding to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 6 |
Assess the reliability of the test results. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Design further experiments where necessary. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Experimental design is determined based on evaluation of presented task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Correct sized samples are prepared for the material, and selected test 2. Test equipment prepared and set up correctly 3. Tests are performed in compliance with manufacturer specifications 4. Data captured accurately and processed correctly 5. Correct diagnosis is made 6. Documents and reports are accurate 7. Information presented in clear and understandable way 8. No delays are caused as a result of poor planning for conducting tests 9. Applicable safety, health, environmental and quality procedures are adhered to Understanding confirmed: 1. Responding to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Tests are conducted and reliability of test results confirmed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Correct sized samples are prepared for the material, and selected test 2. Test equipment prepared and set up correctly 3. Tests are performed in compliance with manufacturer specifications 4. Data captured accurately and processed correctly 5. Correct diagnosis is made 6. Documents and reports are accurate 7. Information presented in clear and understandable way 8. No delays are caused as a result of poor planning for conducting tests 9. Applicable safety, health, environmental and quality procedures are adhered to Understanding confirmed: 1. Responding to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Report on findings is generated. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Correct sized samples are prepared for the material, and selected test 2. Test equipment prepared and set up correctly 3. Tests are performed in compliance with manufacturer specifications 4. Data captured accurately and processed correctly 5. Correct diagnosis is made 6. Documents and reports are accurate 7. Information presented in clear and understandable way 8. No delays are caused as a result of poor planning for conducting tests 9. Applicable safety, health, environmental and quality procedures are adhered to Understanding confirmed: 1. Responding to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 7 |
Report on findings. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Draw conclusions and make recommendations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Experimental design is determined based on evaluation of presented task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Correct sized samples are prepared for the material, and selected test 2. Test equipment prepared and set up correctly 3. Tests are performed in compliance with manufacturer specifications 4. Data captured accurately and processed correctly 5. Correct diagnosis is made 6. Documents and reports are accurate 7. Information presented in clear and understandable way 8. No delays are caused as a result of poor planning for conducting tests 9. Applicable safety, health, environmental and quality procedures are adhered to Understanding confirmed: 1. Responding to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Tests are conducted and reliability of test results confirmed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Correct sized samples are prepared for the material, and selected test 2. Test equipment prepared and set up correctly 3. Tests are performed in compliance with manufacturer specifications 4. Data captured accurately and processed correctly 5. Correct diagnosis is made 6. Documents and reports are accurate 7. Information presented in clear and understandable way 8. No delays are caused as a result of poor planning for conducting tests 9. Applicable safety, health, environmental and quality procedures are adhered to Understanding confirmed: 1. Responding to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Report on findings is generated. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Correct sized samples are prepared for the material, and selected test 2. Test equipment prepared and set up correctly 3. Tests are performed in compliance with manufacturer specifications 4. Data captured accurately and processed correctly 5. Correct diagnosis is made 6. Documents and reports are accurate 7. Information presented in clear and understandable way 8. No delays are caused as a result of poor planning for conducting tests 9. Applicable safety, health, environmental and quality procedures are adhered to Understanding confirmed: 1. Responding to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 8 |
Monitor the implementation of recommendations made. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Experimental design is determined based on evaluation of presented task. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Correct sized samples are prepared for the material, and selected test 2. Test equipment prepared and set up correctly 3. Tests are performed in compliance with manufacturer specifications 4. Data captured accurately and processed correctly 5. Correct diagnosis is made 6. Documents and reports are accurate 7. Information presented in clear and understandable way 8. No delays are caused as a result of poor planning for conducting tests 9. Applicable safety, health, environmental and quality procedures are adhered to Understanding confirmed: 1. Responding to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Tests are conducted and reliability of test results confirmed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Correct sized samples are prepared for the material, and selected test 2. Test equipment prepared and set up correctly 3. Tests are performed in compliance with manufacturer specifications 4. Data captured accurately and processed correctly 5. Correct diagnosis is made 6. Documents and reports are accurate 7. Information presented in clear and understandable way 8. No delays are caused as a result of poor planning for conducting tests 9. Applicable safety, health, environmental and quality procedures are adhered to Understanding confirmed: 1. Responding to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Report on findings is generated. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Correct sized samples are prepared for the material, and selected test 2. Test equipment prepared and set up correctly 3. Tests are performed in compliance with manufacturer specifications 4. Data captured accurately and processed correctly 5. Correct diagnosis is made 6. Documents and reports are accurate 7. Information presented in clear and understandable way 8. No delays are caused as a result of poor planning for conducting tests 9. Applicable safety, health, environmental and quality procedures are adhered to Understanding confirmed: 1. Responding to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
The assessment will be governed by the policies and guidelines of the MERSETA Education and Training Quality Assuror who has jurisdiction over this field of learning. The assessor will (at the very least) be accredited and have a technical qualification in this learning area.
The learner can be assessed in the language of his/her choice although s/he has to report incidents or conditions to someone else. The learner will be assessed on his/her ability to report in the language commonly used in his/her working environment. The learner will be assessed in the workplace but s/he can submit documents, projects, test results and assignments that were not produced in the workplace. The learner can be assessed against this unit standard to obtain credits or as part of an integrated assessment for a qualification. |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
Names & functions of:
Attributes, descriptions, characteristics & properties: Purpose of: Processes, events, causes and effects, implications: Procedures and techniques: Regulations, legislation, agreements, policies, standards: Theory: rules, principles, laws: Relationships, systems: |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identify and solve problems.
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Work effectively with others.
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organise and manage myself and my activities.
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collect, analyse, organise and critically evaluate information.
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicate effectively.
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use science and technology effectively and critically.
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of related systems.
|
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 22774 | National Diploma: Rubber Technology | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | MERSETA |
Elective | 23260 | National Certificate: Industrial Rubber Manufacturing: Mixing OR Extruding OR Moulding OR Calendaring | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | MERSETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |