All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Conduct mould or material trials in volume manufacturing processes |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
12664 | Conduct mould or material trials in volume manufacturing processes | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Manufacturing and Assembly Processes | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 06 - Manufacturing, Engineering and Technology | Manufacturing and Assembly | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 12 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2004-12-02 | 2005-04-13 | SAQA 1657/04 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2006-04-13 | 2009-04-13 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard is replaced by: |
US ID | Unit Standard Title | Pre-2009 NQF Level | NQF Level | Credits | Replacement Status |
119163 | Conduct tooling, material or equipment trials in plastics manufacturing processes | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 12 |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
Determining performance of a new mould or material. |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
This unit standard has been designed as part of a progression. It is one of a series of unit standards for activities below, at and above this level. The credits assigned to it are based on the assumption that I have already been assessed and have obtained credits for related activities at this level or below it.
If I have experience in these related activities but do not have such credits, I can obtain credits by being assessed through a process which recognises prior learning. If I do not have such experience, then my learning time will be increased. I can choose to be assessed and obtain credits against those other unit standards as I make progress towards the outcomes of this unit standard. |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
This standard covers the introduction of any new aspect in the production process. It includes but is not limited to:
This standard may require me to involve others in the process. They may carry out parts of the trial under my direction. I will be assessed on my ability to brief and advise them. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Collect data for evaluation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Data on performance of mould or material. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Sample product. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Project plan. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Data sourced. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
5. Inspection and test results. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
6. Project team. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
7. Product cost. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Formulate project plan. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Data on performance of mould or material. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Sample product. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Project plan. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Data sourced. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
5. Inspection and test results. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
6. Project team. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
7. Product cost. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Select and brief project team. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Data on performance of mould or material. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Sample product. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Project plan. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Data sourced. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
5. Inspection and test results. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
6. Project team. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
7. Product cost. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Arrange necessary tools, equipment and material. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Data on performance of mould or material. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Sample product. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Project plan. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Data sourced. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
5. Inspection and test results. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
6. Project team. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
7. Product cost. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
Run trials and report on results. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Data on performance of mould or material. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Sample product. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Project plan. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Data sourced. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
5. Inspection and test results. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
6. Project team. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
7. Product cost. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 6 |
Present final report and recommendations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Data on performance of mould or material. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Sample product. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Project plan. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Data sourced. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
5. Inspection and test results. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
6. Project team. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
7. Product cost. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Effective plan to test and determine best options 2. Procedures adhered to 3. Within timeframes 4. Accuracy in recording of detail 5. Co-ordination of the various activities and people involved Understanding confirmed: 1. Discuss options 2. Explain salient features of trial 3. Indicate areas of concern 4. Make recommendations on the design or manufacture of the mould or the modification of the materials tested |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
My assessment will be governed by the policies and guidelines of an Education and Training Quality Assurer who has jurisdiction over this field of learning. My assessor will (at the very least) be accredited and have a technical qualification in this learning area.
I can be assessed in the language of my choice although if I have to report incidents, or conditions to someone else I will be assessed on my ability to report in the language commonly used in my working environment. I will be assessed in the workplace but I can submit documents, projects, test results and assignments that were not produced in the workplace. I can be assessed against this unit standard to obtain credits or as part of an integrated assessment for a qualification. |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
Names & functions of:
Properties, descriptions, characteristics & attributes: Sensory cues: Purpose of: Processes, events, causes and effects, implications: Procedures and techniques Regulations, legislation, agreements, policies, standards Theory: rules, principles, laws Relationships, systems: |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identify and solve problems .
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Work effectively with others.
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organise and manage myself and my activities.
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collect, analyse, organise and critically evaluate information.
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicate effectively.
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use science and technology effectively and critically.
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of related systems .
|
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
This unit standard has been replaced by unit standard 119163, which is 'Conduct tooling, material or equipment trials in plastics manufacturing processes', Level 5, 12 credits. |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 20891 | National Certificate: Plastics Manufacturing | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Registered" |
2005-04-13 | Was MERSETA until Last Date for Achievement |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |