SAQA

All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source.

SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY

REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE:

Develop personal conservation ethics

SAQA US ID	UNIT STANDARD TITLE
12648	Develop personal conservation ethics
ORIGINATOR
SGB Nature Conservation
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY
-
FIELD			SUBFIELD
Field 01 - Agriculture and Nature Conservation			Nature Conservation
ABET BAND	UNIT STANDARD TYPE	PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL	NQF LEVEL	CREDITS
Undefined	Regular	Level 1	NQF Level 01	3
REGISTRATION STATUS		REGISTRATION START DATE	REGISTRATION END DATE	SAQA DECISION NUMBER
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered"		2005-09-13	2008-09-13	SAQA 0160/05
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT		LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT
2009-09-13		2012-09-13

In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise.

This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard.

PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD

A person assessed as competent against this unit standard will develop a personal set of values around local conservation and environmental issues. Achievement of this unit standard will contribute towards sound conservation practices.

This competence will equip the qualifying learner with the skills required to undertake an important role in nature conservation and will enhance the employability of the qualifying learner in both nature conservation and other related jobs.

In addition the qualifying learner will be well positioned to extend their learning and practice into other areas of conservation, or to strive towards conservation standards and practice at higher levels.

LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING

A person taking this unit standard is assumed to have some basic literacy.

UNIT STANDARD RANGE

Guides to the scope and complexity of the specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge are provided in bullet points beneath each. These are prefaced by "e.g." since they are neither comprehensive nor necessarily appropriate to all contexts. Alternatives must however be comparable in scope and complexity.

Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria:

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1

Describe the scope of conservation.

OUTCOME NOTES

For example:

Water

Heritage

Urban conservation

Eco-tourism

Scientific knowledge

Indigenous knowledge systems

Fauna and flora

Community conservation

Marine

Geology

Preservation vs. conservation

Sustainability

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1

When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit standards being assessed.

They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge.

As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which learners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment.
Please note: learners for this standard may be unemployed, self-employed or in full employment. Assessors must ensure that assessment methods are appropriate for the learner's context.

The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a learner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent.
Similarly, if a learner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent.

METHOD OF ASSESSMENT

Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-related, out-of-classroom simulation.

A range of assessment methods should be used, including:
Direct observation - watch the learner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions.
Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the learner.
Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the learner to demonstrate in a simulated environment.
Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard.
Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g. reports from a third party).

Integrated assessment:
It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'.

Consider a complete activity in the workplace (the 'whole of work' approach) and see which unit standards relate to this activity. Please note if a learner has no formal workplace, simulations or projects can be used to reflect a complete activity.

Work out how learners could collect evidence on a number of unit standards at the same time covering all the critical aspects of the standards.

Ensure that commonalities that exist between a number of unit standards are captured in a way that makes sense for assessment.

Contextualising the outcomes, embedded knowledge and CCOs:
Assessing the following will ensure the specific outcomes, essential embedded knowledge and critical-cross-field outcomes are assessed.
NB: at NQF Level 1 the learner's ability to make decisions and act may be restricted by the workplace or learning environment. The aim of many of the standards at this level is to provide a foundation of learning to enable application at higher levels.

Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly:
Assessors should consider:
1. Learners' own ethical and social behaviour towards the environment (natural or cultural).
2. Ways to adapt learners' own behaviour.

Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE:
Assessors should consider:
3. Learners' reflection on own performance in order to enhance future practice and learning.

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2

Explain different interests and values that could impact upon conservation.

OUTCOME NOTES

For example:

Population needs and interests

Environmental needs and interests

Economic needs and interests

Heritage, traditional and/or cultural needs and interests

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1

Work out how learners could collect evidence on a number of unit standards at the same time covering all the critical aspects of the standards.

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3

Identify a conservation issue in a local context that shows different value systems.

OUTCOME NOTES

For example:

Burning practices

Grazing practices

Problem animals

Traditional and cultural practices

Harvesting practices

Waste management

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1

Work out how learners could collect evidence on a number of unit standards at the same time covering all the critical aspects of the standards.

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4

Evaluate one's own contribution to conservation in a local context.

OUTCOME NOTES

For example, own:

Value system in relation to conservation

Ethical perspective in relation to conservation

Attitude to behaviour of others in relation to conservation

Consequences of actions in relation to conservation

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1

Work out how learners could collect evidence on a number of unit standards at the same time covering all the critical aspects of the standards.

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5

Understand other people's actions and attitudes towards conservation issues.

OUTCOME NOTES

Understand other people's actions and attitudes towards conservation issues in light of their own value systems.
For example:

Cultural and behavioural practices

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1

Work out how learners could collect evidence on a number of unit standards at the same time covering all the critical aspects of the standards.

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 6

Describe ways in which one's own behaviour may be changed.

OUTCOME NOTES

Describe ways in which one's own behaviour may be changed after evaluating ones impact on the environment.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1

Work out how learners could collect evidence on a number of unit standards at the same time covering all the critical aspects of the standards.

UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS

1. Anyone assessing a learner or moderating the assessment of a learner against this unit standard must be registered as an assessor with the relevant ETQA.
2. Any institution offering learning that will enable the achievement of this unit standard must be accredited as a provider with the relevant ETQA.
3. Assessment and moderation of assessment will be overseen by the relevant ETQA according to the ETQAs policies and guidelines for assessment and moderation; in terms of agreements reached around assessment and moderation between ETQAs (including professional bodies); and in terms of the moderation guideline detailed under point 4 immediately below.
4. Moderation must include both internal and external moderation of assessments at exit points of the qualification, unless ETQA policies specify otherwise. Moderation should also encompass achievement of the competence described both in individual unit standards as well as the integrated competence described in the qualification.

Anyone wishing to be assessed against this qualification may apply to be assessed by any assessment agency, assessor or provider institution that is accredited by the relevant ETQA.

UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE

The knowledge component of this standard is to demonstrate an understanding of the:

Concept of sustainable use of resources.

Consequences of depleting natural resources.

Consequences of destroying cultural resources.

Concept of conserving resources.

Impact of different interests and values on related conservation issues.

Interaction of plants, animals and humans in the environment.

UNIT STANDARD NOTES

Conservation is defined by the IUCN as: "Management of human use of the biosphere so that it may yield the greatest sustainable benefit to present generations while maintaining its potential to meet the need and aspirations of future generations. Thus conservation is positive, embracing preservation, maintenance, sustainable utilisation, restoration and enhancement of the natural environment."

This Unit Standard relates to Critical Cross-field Outcomes.

QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD:

	ID	QUALIFICATION TITLE	PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL	NQF LEVEL	STATUS	END DATE	PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY
Core	22971	General Education and Training Certificate: Conservation	Level 1	NQF Level 01	Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered"	2012-06-30	CATHSSETA

PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD:

This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here.

NONE