All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Apply quality assurance in the wool and mohair fibre industry |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
123153 | Apply quality assurance in the wool and mohair fibre industry | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Secondary Agriculture: Processing | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 01 - Agriculture and Nature Conservation | Secondary Agriculture | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 2 | NQF Level 02 | 10 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
A person credited with this unit standard will be able to:
|
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
Communication and Mathematical Literacy at NQF Level 1. |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
N/A |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Demonstrate an understanding of the benefits that a Quality Assurance (QA) system effects in the wool and mohair fibre industry. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
The range includes but is not limited to: client quality perception, profit enhancing, training, quality assurance is proactive not reactive, non-conformity / defects traceability, products of a Quality Assurance system : continual improvement, minimising risk, productivity. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The impact that a Quality Assurance system has on the 'client's quality perception' is described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The ways in which a Quality Assurance system can enhance profitability are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The positive results of the implementation of a Quality Assurance system in the wool and mohair industry are detailed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The proactive nature of a Quality Assurance system is explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The positive role that Quality Assurance training has on productivity and the achievement of product excellence is explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
The benefits that the Quality Assurance's traceability program has in maintaining quality are described. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Describe the worker's role and responsibilities within in a Quality Assurance system. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
The range includes but is not limited to: difference between Quality Assurance and quality control (QC), individual QC, empowered to reject any non-conformity / defect, note and report frequent non conformity. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The differences between Quality Control and Quality Assurance are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The basic principles of the individual worker's Quality Control functions are detailed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The right of the individual to reject any non-conforming / defective item that is forwarded to them, is explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The importance of detecting any non-conformity before the products are despatched is explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The methods of reporting a non-conforming item, as per the company's Standards Operating Procedures are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
The importance of noting any frequent non-conformity and the possible cause/s of these is explained. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Explain the role that existing programs and procedures serve within the Quality Assurance system. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
The range includes but is not limited to: pre-requisite programs (existing programs and procedures) added focus and role of existing programs, pre-requisite programs: facilities maintenance, sorting. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The role and additional focus that existing programs have in the overall Quality assurance system is described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The existing "pre-requisite" programs that form part of the Quality Assurance system are detailed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The way in which each existing pre-requisite program supports and influences the Quality Assurance is identified. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Identify the critical control points, where quality is most likely to be negatively affected in a wool and mohair facility. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
The range includes but is not limited to: criteria for non-conformity Sources of contamination: water, alien fibres, oil, foreign objects, Results of contamination: combustion, rotting, value reduction, customer satisfaction, Critical control points: receiving, core and grabbing, sorting, binning and blending, shipping and dispatching. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The criteria for the classification of non-conformity of various items are detailed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The common sources of fibre contamination are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The results of contamination of wool and mohair by water are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The effects of alien fibres within wool and mohair are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The results of contamination of wool and mohair by oil and foreign objects are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
The critical control points within the wool and mohair processes are detailed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
The types of contamination that may occur at each control point are described. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
Describe the objectives and functions of the Q A remedial program. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
The range includes but is not limited to: Standard operating procedures, traceability, client communication, non-conformity identification, reporting channels for non-conformity, examination, remedial action. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The criteria for the identification of defects / non-conformity and the procedures for the registration of these are detailed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The channels for reporting defects / non-conformity within the process are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The role that the traceability procedures play in locating the source of a defect / non conformance when reported by a client, is explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The procedures for the examination of defects / non-conformity, as per the company's Standard Operating Procedures are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The procedures for reviewing the causes of non-conformity and the adoption of remedial measures to minimise a reoccurrence, as per the company's Standard Operating Procedures are described. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 6 |
Describe the objectives and functions of the Quality Assurance customer communication and product traceability programs. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
The range includes but is not limited to: feedback from customers, complaints and compliments: telephonic and in writing, Traceability: reference numbers, mapping, stowage, delivery documents. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The importance of the feedback that is gained from the customer communication program is explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The necessity of registering all customer comments, whether they are given verbally or in writing is explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The importance of the traceability program and the role that it performs is explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The operation and functioning of the traceability program is described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The various points within the process, where the location and status of the bales are documented, are identified. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
The various identification markings and documentation that the bales undergo through the process are detailed. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
Embedded knowledge is reflected in the Assessment Criteria for each Specific Outcome. |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
The learner is able to identify and solve problems in which responses display that responsible decisions using critical and creative thinking have been made by:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
The learner is able to work effectively with others as a member of a team, group, organisation or communities by:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
The learner is able to organise and manage oneself and one's activities responsibly and effectively by:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
The learner is able to collect, organise and critically evaluate information by:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
The learner is able to communicate effectively using visual, mathematical and/or language skills in the modes of oral and/or written presentation by:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
The learner is able to use science and technology effectively and critically, showing responsibility towards the environment and health of others by:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
The learner is able to demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of related systems by recognizing that problem-solving contexts do not exist in isolation.
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING |
The learner is able to contribute to the full personal development of themselves and the social and economic development of the society at large.
|
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
The Learner:
At this level the communication / reporting of issues arising in the workplace, is embedded in the specific outcomes and the related assessment criteria. It is understood that, due to the nature of the work environment and the skills level of the learner, that the aspects of teamwork form an integral part of the necessary specific outcomes and related assessment criteria. The points included under the notes, should be included when the qualifying learners are being assessed. |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 50228 | National Certificate: Wool and Mohair Handling | Level 2 | NQF Level 02 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | AgriSETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |