All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Discuss the benefits and risks of engaging the media in different social contexts |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
120085 | Discuss the benefits and risks of engaging the media in different social contexts | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Victim Empowerment | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 07 - Human and Social Studies | People/Human-Centred Development | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | 3 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
The qualifying learner will demonstrate an understanding of the role of the media in society and the risks and benefits for the sector in engaging with the media.
Learners will include Government officials and service providers in the Non-Government Organisations (NGOs), Community Based Organisations (CBOs) and Faith Based Organisations (FBOs) sectors. Learners accredited with this Unit Standard will be capable of: |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
It is assumed that a learner will be competent in:
|
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
Range of ethical considerations includes, but is not limited to: verification and accuracy of facts, freedom of speech, independence of media, protection of sources, confidentiality, etc.
Range of roles include, but is not limited to: education and informing society with regard to crime and its consequences, crime prevention, recruitment of volunteers, fundraising, marketing of services, accessing services, advocacy relating to key issues, etc. Range of ways the media perpetuates stereotypes includes, but is not limited to: reports on extreme/unusual cases at the cost of victims, patriarchy, sensationalism, etc. Range of components includes, but is not limited to: communication and approval channels, designated spokesperson, disreputable conduct, confidentiality, issuing of press releases, targeted media engagement, etc. "Understating" includes, but is not limited to cases where the effects of criminal acts on victims are overlooked, dismissed or victims are belittled e.g. downplaying the victim's plight in sensational reporting. "Overstating" includes, but is not limited to exaggeration of the victim's suffering or the reactions of the victims. Range of relevant legislation includes, but is not limited to: South African Victims' Charter, South African Constitution, Bill of Rights, Privacy laws, etc. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Explain the role of the media in a democratic society. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Different types of media are identified with examples. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The purpose and the role of the media in society is explained with specific reference to the South African context. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The legal and ethical framework within which the media operates in a democratic society is described with reference to a South African context. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Ethical considerations includes, but is not limited to: verification and accuracy of facts, freedom of speech, independence of media, protection of sources, confidentiality. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Key provisions of South African legislation as it relates to the media are explained with examples. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Explain the relevance of engaging the media in the South African context. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The potential role of the media in the Victim Empowerment sector is described with examples. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Roles include, but is not limited to: education and informing society with regard to crime and its consequences, crime prevention, recruitment of volunteers, fundraising, marketing of services, facilitating access to services, advocacy relating to key issues, etc. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The ways in which the media tends to perpetuate stereotypes and influence the attitudes and behaviour in society are explained with examples. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Ways the media perpetuates stereotypes includes, but is not limited to: reports on extreme/unusual cases at the cost of victims, patriarchy, sensationalism, etc. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The consequences of "overstating" or "understating" in relation to victims are explained using examples. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Examples of responsible and irresponsible reporting are illustrated using recent case studies. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The risks of irresponsible reporting for victims, alleged offenders, the criminal investigation and the community are explained using appropriate case studies. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
Complaint mechanisms for the reporting of irresponsible media coverage are identified and procedures for laying a formal complaint is outlined according to organisational procedures. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Develop media relation's strategies for organisations/divisions/departments. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The value of establishing and maintaining good relations with the media is described with examples. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Key components of the organisation's media policy are described with examples. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Components includes, but is not limited to: communication and approval channels, designated spokesperson, disreputable conduct, confidentiality, issuing of press releases, targeted media engagement. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The importance of balancing the public's right to know and the victim's right to privacy is explained with examples. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Legislative provisions to protect victim's privacy are explained using examples. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Strategies to engage with antagonistic and hostile media are illustrated through role-play. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
Civil remedies available to victims whose rights have been infringed by the media are described in accordance with relevant legislation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Relevant legislation includes, but is not limited to: South African Victims' Charter, South African Constitution, Bill of Rights, Privacy laws, etc. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
Moderation:
|
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identify and solve problems associated with engaging the media in Victim Empowerment using responsible decision-making and creative thinking. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Work effectively with others as a member of a team, group, organisation or community on a daily basis to effectively engage the media in Victim Empowerment. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organise and manage oneself and one's activities responsibly and effectively to engage with the media to the benefit of the Victim Empowerment sector. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicate effectively using appropriate modes of oral and/or written persuasion in a multidisciplinary and inter-sectoral approach to engaging with the media in Victim Empowerment. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Demonstrate an understanding of the world, as a set of related systems by recognising that problem solving when engaging with the media occurs in a variety of contexts. |
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
Assessors must be registered as assessors with a relevant ETQA, or an ETQA that has a Memorandum of Understanding with the relevant ETQA. |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
N/A |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 49836 | Further Education and Training Certificate: Gender Practice | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | HW SETA |
Elective | 66749 | National Certificate: Community Development | Level 3 | NQF Level 03 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | ETDP SETA |
Elective | 67509 | Further Education and Training Certificate: Community Development | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual |
Elective | 49872 | Further Education and Training Certificate: Victim Empowerment Co-ordination | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | HW SETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
1. | Dee s Training PTY LTD |
2. | Gender Education & Development Institute (GEDI |
3. | Gotsec Skills Training |
4. | LESEDI EDUCARE ASSOCIATION |
5. | MENTORNET (PTY) LTD |
6. | Tembe Service Providers |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |