All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Manage the design, development and review of a human resource information system |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
11906 | Manage the design, development and review of a human resource information system | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Human Resource Management and Practices | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 03 - Business, Commerce and Management Studies | Human Resources | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 3 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2026-06-30 | 2029-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
This unit standard is intended for persons who manage, or seek to manage, human resources management processes within an organisation. Persons credited with this unit standard are able to manage the development of a human resource information system, review the effectiveness of the system and make recommendations for improvements. |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
It is assumed that people starting to learn towards this standard are able to demonstrate the competencies described in the unit standard "Manage the capture, storage, retrieval and provision of information related to human resources management"; namely to:
|
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
Manage includes determining information needs, developing the brief for design, sourcing the brief and reviewing the design. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Manage the design and development of an information system for human resources management. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Manage includes determining information needs, developing the brief for design, sourcing the brief and reviewing the design. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. The process of analysis is sufficient to define all the requirements within the organisation for information related to human resources management and to support decision-making about information system design. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Requirements include the type of information, the relationships between the various categories of information and intended uses of the system and legislation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. The process accounts for all internal and external information needs related to human resources management. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. The design brief provides sufficient information for the development of an effective information system for human resources management. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Effective means that the system provides for all identified uses and provides for easy and rapid access of information on demand, for specified purposes and authorised personnel. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. The design of the system is aligned to the organisation's values and culture, and contributes to the achievement of its strategies and plans. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
5. The design is sufficiently flexible to respond to current and emerging needs, and comply with current best practices. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
6. The brief includes a reasonable time stipulated for the completion of the development. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
7. Information system developers are sourced in accordance with organisational procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
8. Developers are selected in accordance with their ability to meet the design brief. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 9 |
9. Sourced information is obtained in accordance with established procedures and is current, relevant, precise and from reliable sources. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Review the information system for human resources management. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. The system is evaluated to ensure identified user requirements are met. Appropriate measures are taken to ensure deficiencies are rectified. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
The evaluation is conducted after initial development and as an continuous process when in use. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Review measures and criteria are cost effective, and make optimum use of data sources and means of collection. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Review measures and criteria provide sufficient and timely information to make judgements about effectiveness of the information system for human resources management. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Resources required to conduct the review are identified and sought, and are appropriate to the review method to be utilised. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Resources include but not limited to internal expert/s, external expert/s, budget, and senior human resource management support. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
5. Conclusions of the review define and detail the effectiveness of the information system for human resources management and are in the required format, within the required timeframes. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
6. Review is conducted in accordance with organisational and legal requirements. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Make recommendations for improvements of the information system for human resources management. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Input from internal and external consultation is obtained and incorporated into recommendations in a manner that meets organisational requirements. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Assessment of perceived weakness and gaps between existing system and organisational needs includes all relevant information subsystems, with cause and effect links established. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Alternatives for improvements are considered in terms of strategic, tactical and operational implications and consider risk, contingency, feasibility and cost-effectiveness. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Information management system techniques and methods for improvement are identified, and are compatible with greater organisation requirements. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
1. Anyone assessing a learner against this unit standard must be registered as an assessor with the relevant ETQA.
2. Any institution offering learning that will enable achievement of this unit standard or will assess this unit standard must be accredited as a provider with the relevant ETQA. 3. Moderation of assessment will be overseen by the relevant ETQA according to the moderation guidelines in the relevant qualification and the agreed ETQA procedures. 4. Therefore, anyone wishing to be assessed against this unit standard may apply to be assessed by any assessment agency, assessor or provider institution that is accredited by the relevant ETQA. |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
Knowledge considered to be critical evidence of competence is included in the assessment criteria explicitly, or can be inferred by performance. This includes knowledge on
|
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identify and solve problems by, e.g.,
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Work effectively with others as a member of a team, e.g.,
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collect, analyse, organise and critically evaluate information, e.g.,
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicating effectively, e.g., when
|
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Fundamental | 24453 | National Certificate: Real Estate | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | SERVICES |
Elective | 61592 | National Diploma: Human Resources Management and Practices | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual |
Elective | 50333 | National Diploma: Occupationally Directed Education, Training and Development Practices | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | ETDP SETA |
Elective | 35926 | National Diploma: Payroll Administration Services | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2009-03-31 | Was SERVICES until Last Date for Achievement |
Elective | 67229 | National Diploma: Payroll Administration Services | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | SERVICES |
Elective | 50330 | Bachelor: Occupationally Directed Education Training and Development Practices | Level 6 | NQF Level 07 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
1. | AFRICA COMPETENCY DEVELOPMENT (PTY) LTD |
2. | Amaqamu Project Management and Consulting |
3. | ASSESSMENT COLLEGE OF SOUTH AFRICA PTY LTD |
4. | Aubrey Nyiko Business Enterprise cc |
5. | Ayoba Training Institute (Pty)Ltd |
6. | Bohlali Provider Support |
7. | Chartall Business College |
8. | Dabulamanzi & Njabulo Ndaba Consulting cc |
9. | Divine Inspiration Trading 704 PTY Ltd |
10. | EDUTEL SKILLS DEVELOPMENT PTY LTD |
11. | Emergence Learning Academy (Pty) Ltd |
12. | Future Discovery Training Academy CC |
13. | Igugu Training and Investments |
14. | Isamon Vocational College of Excellence Pty Ltd |
15. | Khaas Training Academy |
16. | Learnership Support Systems (Pty) Ltd |
17. | MACCAUVLEI LEARNING ACADEMY (PTY) LTD |
18. | MENTORNET (PTY) LTD |
19. | NTI College |
20. | OMNI HR CONSULTING PTY LTD |
21. | Regenesys Management (Pty) Ltd |
22. | Resonance Institute of Learning |
23. | Saint Colonel Graduate Institute (PTY) Ltd |
24. | Southern African Institute of Learning (SAIL) |
25. | The Brokers Learning Centre |
26. | The Finishing College (Pty) Lt |
27. | The Institute of People Development |
28. | Thuto Adult Centre |
29. | TMG Quality Services |
30. | Training Answers |
31. | Ulwazi Training & Development |
32. | University of Johannesburg |
33. | VERYCOOLIDEAS |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |