All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Conduct an analysis of explosives vulnerability |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
117460 | Conduct an analysis of explosives vulnerability | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Bomb Disposal and Explosives Control | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 08 - Law, Military Science and Security | Safety in Society | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 4 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
This unit standard is for Bomb Disposal and Explosives Control officials in the field of safety in society who need to execute policing functions and tasks in dangerous situations.
This unit standard will contribute towards compliance with tactical -, legal -, safety- and organisational requirements related to Bomb Disposal and Explosives Control. Learners credited with this unit standard will be able to: |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
Learners embarking on study towards this unit standard are assumed to have completed the following unit standards
|
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
N/A |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Conduct a physical security assessment of a designated protectee to determine his or her vulnerability to an explosive attack. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The concept explosives vulnerability analysis is explained according to organizational policies and procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The reasons for the conducting of an explosives vulnerability analysis is explained according to organizational policies and procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
A person target selection is compiled and evaluated according to the "Carver" principles (Criticality, accessibility, recoverability, vulnerability, effect and risk) according to organizational policies and procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The sources of information as well as the explosives vulnerability analysis considerations is considered according to organizational policies and procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The resources vulnerable are identified and interviewed according to organizational policies and procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
The physical environment and utilities are evaluated according to organizational policies and procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
A physical security assessment is conducted according to "Carver" principles. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Conduct a physical security assessment of a building or facility to determine and prioritize those areas most critical and vulnerable to an explosive attack. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The concept explosives vulnerability analysis is explained according to organizational policies and procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The reasons for the conducting of an explosives vulnerability analysis is explained according to organizational policies and procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
A target selection is compiled and evaluated according to the "Carver" principles (Criticality, accessibility, recoverability, vulnerability, effect and risk) according to organizational policies and procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The sources of information as well as the explosives vulnerability analysis considerations is considered according to organizational policies and procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The resources vulnerable are identified and interviewed according to organizational policies and procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
The physical structure, environment and utilities are evaluated according to organizational policies and procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
A physical security assessment is conducted according to "Carver" principles according to organizational policies and procedures. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
The standard describes competent performance in doing physical techniques that will enhance their job performance, and lay down the criteria by which competence should be judged, as well as the range of circumstances in which competence should be demonstrated. Integrated assessment methods and tools will allow the candidate to demonstrate that she/ he has acquired knowledge of and can safely and effectively apply competence identified in this unit standard. These tools include the following: These methods must be carefully selected based on the purpose of the assessment (For example, the written method of assessing knowledge or on-job demonstration of practical competence). The assessment must integrate a number of different methods in order to give the assessor reliable and valid proof of competence and evidence of required attitudes. Level: This unit standard should develop learners who demonstrate: |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
1. A basic understanding of the relevant legislation (Explosive Act 26 of 1956) and Regulations, and procedures and practices
2. A comprehensive understanding of the conducting of a physical security assessment of a designated protectee and physical security assessment of a building or facility to determine and prioritize those areas most critical and vulnerable to an explosive attack |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
The following policing specific outcomes must be assessed; 1. Courage to take risk and even put own life at risks to safe others 2. Discipline to accept instructions and policy 3. Physical ability to do the job (includes fitness and health required to move in the field with the sections without putting themselves in danger) 4. Patriotism and loyalty to the country and its entire people. |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
High emphasis is placed on problem solving ability during exercises. Exercises and scenarios have a variety to ensure problem-solving ability is developed and not stereotyped step that the person cannot apply in practice |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Ability to be a team player in order to establish synergy during joint operations and in teams. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organize one self and ones activities while preparing personal equipment and plan own tasks for search procedures |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collect, analyze, organize and critically evaluate information received |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Technical ability in using special equipment |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Understand the world as a set of related systems by understanding the consequences of the incorrect evaluation and search procedures |
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
Specified requirements:
Specified requirements include legal and legislative specific requirements and are contained in one or more of the following documents: Context specific: Organizational policies and procedures regarding Bomb Disposal. Requirements of a portfolio: Valid, reliable and authentic evidence (presented as a portfolio of evidence) from past achievements and experience, which serves to supplement the assessment of, applied competence. The portfolio may include inter alia: Credits: Classroom: 10 Hours Structured learning in the workplace: 20 Hours Coaching/mentoring: 05 Hours Self study: 05 Hours Other: N/A Total: 40 Hours Credits: 4 |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 63229 | National Diploma: Bomb Disposal | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | SAS SETA |
Core | 49124 | National Diploma: Bomb Disposal | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Registered" |
2007-12-02 | Was SAS SETA until Last Date for Achievement |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |