All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Manage soil systems |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
116371 | Manage soil systems | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Primary Agriculture | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 01 - Agriculture and Nature Conservation | Primary Agriculture | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 10 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2026-06-30 | 2029-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
A learner achieving this unit standard will be able to set up and manage a soil fertility and plant nutrition plan.
Learners will gain specific knowledge and skills in soil and plant nutrition and will be able to operate in a plant production environment implementing sustainable and economically viable production principles. They will be capacitated to gain access to the mainstream agricultural sector, in plant production, impacting directly on the sustainability of the sub-sector. The improvement in production technology will also have a direct impact on the improvement of agricultural productivity of the sector. |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
It is assumed that a learner attempting this unit standard will demonstrate competence against unit standard
|
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
Whilst range statements have been defined generically to include as wide a set of alternatives as possible, all range statements should be interpreted within the specific context of application.
Range statements are neither comprehensive nor necessarily appropriate to all contexts. Alternatives must however be comparable in scope and complexity. These are only as a general guide to scope and complexity of what is required. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Interpret soil and leaf analysis and make appropriate nutrient application recommendations. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
A recommendation refers to nutrient application, which includes but is not limited to agrochemical or organic nutrient material. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The ability to interpret soil and leaf analysis is demonstrated. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The ability to make accurate nutrient recommendations based on the interpretation is demonstrated. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The ability to distinguish between nutrient requirements of crops is explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Seasonal nutrient requirements of different crops are explained. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Optimise soil utilization plan according to crop and soil requirements. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Soil utilisation plan refers to but is not limited to crop establishment but can include conservation areas and infrastructure planning.
Soil depth, drainage, infiltration rate, pH, water holding capacity, field capacity, soil horizons, soil aeration, erosion danger, organic content, active biomass, texture, clay content, structure, biological content, compaction, CEC, CAC, nutrient content, C:N ratios. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The ability to evaluate a soil utilization plan is demonstrated. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
A soil utilization plan in accordance with natural resource availability is designed. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Keep all records regarding soil properties and use to build a database for future reference. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Records refer to but not limited to leaf, soil and fruit analysis, soil maps and observations of soil properties and crop yields. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Different types of data collected are categorised. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Different types of record keeping systems are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
An ability to use the information from the database appropriately is demonstrated. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Design a soil systems management strategy. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Soil systems refer to but are not limited to soil maps, field histories, slope / contours, mulching, application of nutrients, soil preparation techniques, rehabilitation, erosion control measures, compaction control measures, controlled traffic, and crust formation control measures, chemical, physical and biological properties. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The various components of a soils systems management plan are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
A soil systems management plan is produced. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The sustainability of a soil management plan is evaluated. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
Create and implement a database for soil management. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Soil preparation and improvement Method / technique for soil improvement according to soil properties refer to but is not limited to Tillage operations such as mechanical, non mechanical, organic, Minimum and zero Tillage and application of nutrients (liquid and solid). |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The different types of soil preparation methods are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Different methods of soil improvement are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The suitability of a nutrient management plan in relation to soil conservation, water availability and crop requirements is evaluated. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
The assessment of qualifying learners against this standard should meet the requirements of established assessment principles.
It will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which the qualifying learners are working. These activities and tools may include an appropriate combination of self-assessment and peer assessment, formative and summative assessment, portfolios and observations etc. The assessment should ensure that all the specific outcomes; critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge are assessed. The specific outcomes must be assessed through observation of performance. Supporting evidence should be used to prove competence of specific outcomes only when they are not clearly seen in the actual performance. Essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in its own right, through oral or written evidence and cannot be assessed only by being observed. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a qualifying learner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a qualifying learner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, then they should not be assessed as competent. Evidence of the specified critical cross-field outcomes should be found both in performance and in the essential embedded knowledge. Performance of specific outcomes must actively affirm target groups of qualifying learners, not unfairly discriminate against them. Qualifying learners should be able to justify their performance in terms of these values. |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
The person is able to demonstrate a basic knowledge of:
|
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Problem Solving: Relates to all specific outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Teamwork: Relates to all specific outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Self-management: Relates to all specific outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Interpreting Information: Relates to all specific outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communication: Relates to all specific outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use Science and Technology: Relates to all specific outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
The world as a set of related systems: Relates to all specific outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING |
Self-development: Relates to all specific outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
N/A |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 49010 | National Diploma: Plant Production | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | AgriSETA |
Elective | 63249 | National Diploma: Agricultural Extension | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | AgriSETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
1. | The Skills Development Hub (Pty) Ltd |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |