All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Operate and support a food safety and quality management system in the agricultural supply chain |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
116070 | Operate and support a food safety and quality management system in the agricultural supply chain | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Primary Agriculture | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 01 - Agriculture and Nature Conservation | Primary Agriculture | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 2 | NQF Level 02 | 2 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2026-06-30 | 2029-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
A learner achieving this unit standard will be able to monitor and support the implementation of food safety and quality, production, environmental and social practices and awareness within the agricultural supply chain.
Learners will gain an understanding of sustainable agricultural practices as applied in the animal-, plant and mixed farming sub fields. The application of food safety in primary agriculture is focussed on in this unit standard. They will be able to participate in, undertake and plan farming practices with knowledge of their environment. A culture of maintenance and care will be instilled for both the environment as well as towards farming infrastructure and operations. |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
It is assumed that a learner attempting this unit standard will show competence against the following unit standards or equivalent:
|
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
Whilst range statements have been defined generically to include as wide a set of alternatives as possible, all range statements should be interpreted within the specific context of application.
Range statements are neither comprehensive nor necessarily appropriate to all contexts. Alternatives must however be comparable in scope and complexity. These are only as a general guide to scope and complexity of what is required. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Apply basic food safety practices. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Food safety practices include but are not limited to hygiene, conservation, waste and pollutants, etc. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Good personal hygiene practices are applied. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Preventative measures against food contamination are applied. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Warning signs regarding product safety are adhered to. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Illustrate basic knowledge to distinguish and report non-conformances and deviations in food safety, quality and the environment with reference to the agricultural enterprise. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Non-conformances and deviations in food safety include but are not limited to deviations from pre-harvest norms such as with fertilizers, agrochemical application, handling etc. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The way non-conformances and deviations in the food safety and quality will be detected is described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The way this problem will be traced to a pre-harvest environment is explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The types of problems the enterprise can have on the environment if plans to deal with deviations are not in place are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The need for worker training with regards to detecting problems in the system and being able to trace it to the source is discussed. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Understanding basic health and social issues in the agricultural environment. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Basic health and social issues include but are not limited to a basic understanding of the occupational health and safety act (OHSA) with reference to the workers and working environment. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The importance of good health care practices is explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Good health care practices include but are not limited to HIV/AIDS, communicable diseases, good nutrition, drug abuse and dependency. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
A brief description of the OHSA and how it relates to the specific agricultural enterprise is given. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The rights of the workers are described with regard to the OHSA and the specific agricultural enterprise. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Basic record keeping and training of the workers are discussed with regard to the OHSA and social issues. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Demonstrate an understanding of risk factors in food safety and quality related to the agricultural supply chain. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Risk factors in food safety and quality include but are not limited to chemical, physical and biological factors. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
What is understood by food safety and quality is explained with reference to the agricultural enterprise. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The different elements that can affect food safety and quality are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The role of worker health and welfare on food safety and quality is discussed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The different records required to assist the operation is described. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
Demonstrate basic understanding of record keeping activities on the farm. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Record keeping includes but is not limited to systematic filing of documents of the farming operations and personnel, both electronically and manually etc. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Your understanding of record keeping is explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The importance of a systematic filing system for records in accordance with GAP (good agricultural practices) and GMP (good manufacturing practices) principles is discussed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
How and where certain files will be found is demonstrated e.g. regarding chemical usage, training or environmental issues etc. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The process that will be followed to find or identify where a problem in the operation occurred is explained. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
The assessment of qualifying learners against this standard should meet the requirements of established assessment principles.
It will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which the qualifying learners are working. These activities and tools may include an appropriate combination of self-assessment and peer assessment, formative and summative assessment, portfolios and observations etc. The assessment should ensure that all the specific outcomes; critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge are assessed. The specific outcomes must be assessed through observation of performance. Supporting evidence should be used to prove competence of specific outcomes only when they are not clearly seen in the actual performance. Essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in its own right, through oral or written evidence and cannot be assessed only by being observed. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a qualifying learner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a qualifying learner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, then they should not be assessed as competent. Evidence of the specified critical cross-field outcomes should be found both in performance and in the essential embedded knowledge. Performance of specific outcomes must actively affirm target groups of qualifying learners, not unfairly discriminate against them. Qualifying learners should be able to justify their performance in terms of these values. |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
A competent learner will demonstrate a basic knowledge of:
|
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Problem solving relates to all specific outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Team work relates to all specific outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Self-organisation and management relates to all specific outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Information evaluation relates to all specific outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communication relates to all specific outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use science and technology relates to all specific outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Inter-relatedness of systems relates to all specific outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING |
Self development relates to all specific outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
This unit standard has reference to workers who are in a management or supervisory level of operations within different fields of the agricultural enterprise to assist with the process of assuring that accreditation for the different export markets are achieved or adhered to. |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 48976 | National Certificate: Animal Production | Level 2 | NQF Level 02 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | AgriSETA |
Core | 48977 | National Certificate: Mixed Farming Systems | Level 2 | NQF Level 02 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | AgriSETA |
Core | 48975 | National Certificate: Plant Production | Level 2 | NQF Level 02 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | AgriSETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
1. | Astral Operations Limited |
2. | Balemi Consulting Pty Ltd |
3. | Boikgantsho Consulting & Events |
4. | Bumunhu Services Providers Cc |
5. | Cedara College of Agriculture |
6. | Dihwai Food Cultural and Agricultural Services |
7. | ELSENBURG AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE |
8. | Escay Catering and other Services |
9. | Ghoenas Kraal Opleiding Sentrum |
10. | Goldfields FET College |
11. | Heedmorine Training |
12. | Impact Plus Training Consultants |
13. | KayDee Project Management Cc |
14. | Kgopane Trading Enterprise |
15. | Kimbali Holdings |
16. | KMK Training Services (PTY) Ltd |
17. | Knowledge For Ever |
18. | Leruo ke Matla Training and Enterprise Development Services |
19. | Maishamalema Development Training |
20. | Mananthatshema Skills Dev. Centre |
21. | Marang Women in Agric and Development |
22. | Mathapuso Construction and Projects |
23. | Matotomana Training & General Trading |
24. | Mbimbini Training and Community Development |
25. | Mobile Agri Skills Development and Training NPC |
26. | Mogaladi Business Enterprise |
27. | Montshepetsa Bosui Farming & Training Cnt |
28. | Morwa Agri-development cc |
29. | Mpontshe Training |
30. | Mthashana FET College - Vryheid Campus |
31. | Mvelo Consultant |
32. | National Institute For The Deaf - NID |
33. | New Heights 1082 Pty Ltd |
34. | Ngwato Wa Mphela Agriculture Training Services |
35. | Nophelo Training Centre |
36. | Novi General Services |
37. | Peritum Agri Institute |
38. | Phill Skills and Development Institute |
39. | Rasun Holdings Pty Ltd |
40. | Sekhukhune FET College - Central Office |
41. | Selipha Trading (Pty) Ltd |
42. | Setlakala Business Development |
43. | Siyafundisa I Africa |
44. | Siyasanga Training Centre |
45. | Suidwes Beleggings Eiendoms Beperk |
46. | Taletso FET College - Central Office |
47. | The Skills Development Hub (Pty) Ltd |
48. | Thuto Boshwa Skills Development Services |
49. | TM Mashwara and Projects |
50. | Tompi Seleka Agricultural College |
51. | TPN Training and Recruitment cc |
52. | Tripple R Training Provider |
53. | University of Limpopo |
54. | Vari Holdings (Pty)Ltd |
55. | Westco Agri Training |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |