|
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
| SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
| REGISTERED QUALIFICATION: |
| Doctor of Philosophy in Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies |
| SAQA QUAL ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | |||
| 97596 | Doctor of Philosophy in Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies | |||
| ORIGINATOR | ||||
| University of the Western Cape | ||||
| PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | NQF SUB-FRAMEWORK | |||
| CHE - Council on Higher Education | HEQSF - Higher Education Qualifications Sub-framework | |||
| QUALIFICATION TYPE | FIELD | SUBFIELD | ||
| Doctoral Degree | Field 07 - Human and Social Studies | Rural and Agrarian Studies | ||
| ABET BAND | MINIMUM CREDITS | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | QUAL CLASS |
| Undefined | 360 | Not Applicable | NQF Level 10 | Regular-Provider-ELOAC |
| REGISTRATION STATUS | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | |
| Registered-data under construction | EXCO 0324/24 | 2024-07-01 | 2027-06-30 | |
| LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
| 2028-06-30 | 2031-06-30 | |||
Registered-data under construction The qualification content is currently being updated for the qualifications with the status “Registered-data under construction” or showing “DETAILS UNDER CONSTRUCTION” to ensure compliance with SAQA’S Policy and Criteria for the registration of qualifications and part-qualifications on the National Qualifications Framework (NQF) (As amended, 2022). These qualifications are re-registered until 30 June 2027 and can legitimately be offered by the institutions to which they are registered. |
| In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
| PURPOSE AND RATIONALE OF THE QUALIFICATION |
| Purpose:
The purpose of the qualification is to offer specialised training in theories, concepts and research methods appropriate to the emerging field of enquiry of poverty, land and agrarian studies. This will contribute to the further development and strengthening of engaged scholarship on issues of great relevance to societies in Africa in particular, experiencing the rapid transformation of their rural economies. Scholarship of this kind can contribute a great deal to policy making, and many of the doctoral learners who are trained will work in applied professions such as development planning. Thus another purpose that the qualification will serve is to build capacity for effective societal responses to social change. At the end of this qualification, the learner should be able to: Rationale: Over the past two decades there has been a revival of scholarly interest in the dynamics of agrarian change and related issues of land reform, rural development, poverty reduction and sustainable natural resource management. This is evident in a dramatic rise in research and publications on these and related topics. Over the past six years the question of the drivers and impacts of large-scale land acquisition and investment in developing countries, together with crises in energy, water and food supply, as well as rapid social change in the countryside of the developing world, have further spurred engaged scholarship on these topics. The leading specialist journals in the field (e.g. Journal of Peasant Studies, Journal of Agrarian Change) are now ranked within the top four journals in the world in wider fields such as development planning and anthropology. This explosion of research and publication is also characterised by a strong emphasis on the development of appropriate theories and concepts as well as the collection of detailed empirical data, and this has driven the emergence of what is widely termed 'critical agrarian studies' as a distinct field of enquiry. Leading centres of research in critical agrarian studies are located at universities in the 'North' such as the Institute of Social Studies at the Hague, the School of Oriental and African Studies at the University of London, and the Institute of Development Studies at the University of Sussex, but also at universities located in the 'Global South', in China, India, Brazil and South Africa (mainly at PLAAS). Another result of the emergence of poverty, land and agrarian studies as an exciting field of enquiry has been increasing demand for doctoral training, and the number of doctoral learners working in the field has risen rapidly. PLAAS itself receives several requests a month from prospective PhD learners from across Africa or further afield, and the numbers of doctoral learners registered at PLAAS has increased in recent years, despite constraints such as the limited number of permanent academic staff. The university also obtained a SArchi chair in this area. |
| LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
| Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL):
Access to the qualification can also be provided in terms of the university's RPL policy and its admission criteria stipulated by Senate. In addition in the RPL process learners have to undergo a Portfolio Development Course (PDC) to support the learner's admission. The PDC will focus on written submission explaining the reasons for the learners' interest in Agrarian Studies as an adjunct to their existing professional competencies and indicating the nature of a possible research project. Entry Requirements: Admission requirements for this qualification are: |
| RECOGNISE PREVIOUS LEARNING? |
| Y |
| QUALIFICATION RULES |
| This qualification comprises compulsory modules of 180 Credits each, totalling 360 Credits.
Modules: |
| EXIT LEVEL OUTCOMES |
| 1. Develop appropriate theories and concepts as well as the collection of detailed empirical data. |
| ASSOCIATED ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
| Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcomes 1:
Integrated Assessment: Learners will complete a full dissertation reporting on research that they have completed. The dissertation will be examined by internal and external examiners appointed by the relevant University Committees. Internal and external moderation/examination: Moderation will be done through the internal and external examiners recommended by the supervisor, and then appointed by the University's Senate Higher Degrees Committee on recommendation of the Faculty to ensure the quality of the study. The University requirement is that the examiners should be experienced assessors with knowledge of the learning field, in whom other assessors have confidence and who are experienced assessors. The learners' knowledge in Agrarian Studies will be assessed by the supervisor and faculty members via a formal proposal for PhD research by the end of their first year. This will be assessed by a committee of at least three professors, one of which must be external. |
| INTERNATIONAL COMPARABILITY |
| The development of the qualification took into consideration the Institute of Development Studies (IDS). The IDS is regarded as a world-leading centre in international development studies with over 50 research learners, working on a range of research topics in many parts of Asia, Africa, the Balkans, Latin America and the Middle East. Research processes focus on social, political and economic development and change that is aimed at developing an understanding of problems of poverty and development related issues within local communities, national political and economic systems, and in the international system. The Institute creates a platform for researchers to share social space for discussion. The research by the Institute is rated at the highest level producing world class, cutting edge original research that have made significant impact to individuals, institutions and societies around the world.
Conclusion: The qualification seeks to maintain high standards as set by the IDS hence it is deemed comparably to qualifications offered in the countries with education institutions who subscribe to the Institute. |
| ARTICULATION OPTIONS |
| This qualification articulates horizontally with:
|
| MODERATION OPTIONS |
| N/A |
| CRITERIA FOR THE REGISTRATION OF ASSESSORS |
| N/A |
| NOTES |
| N/A |
| LEARNING PROGRAMMES RECORDED AGAINST THIS QUALIFICATION: |
| NONE |
| PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS QUALIFICATION: |
| This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
| 1. | University of the Western Cape |
| All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |