The following associated assessment criteria are applicable to the Exit Level Outcomes:
The research topic is relevant to tourism and/or hospitality management in South Africa.
Appropriate research methodology is applied and data and information are sourced, analysed and synthesised in a meaningful and accurate way for the purposes of the research and, where applicable, reference is made to overseas practice.
Appropriate language and correct terminology is used in research documentation and in the dissertation.
Recommendations are made in the dissertation based on the research done that can inform tourism and/or hospitality management and related aspects of tourism.
The dissertation meets the necessary standard in terms of quality standards in terms of both format and content.
Integrated Assessment:
Assessment of the qualification's learning outcomes forms an integral part of the teaching and learning process of the Master's programme. In achieving these learning outcomes students are required to comply with six steps.
Prospective STH postgraduate students are required to submit a three-page preliminary research proposal for evaluation by the STH Research Committee. The committee serves to evaluate the viability of the project and to allocate STH resources. Based on the student's research interest, the STH Research Committee allocates a supervisor to the student.
The student develops a final research proposal for approval by the STH Research Committee under the guidance of the STH appointed supervisor. As part of the approval process, the student presents a research proposal to a departmental research panel. Based on the recommendations of the research panel, the student finalises the proposal, after which the title and the external examiners are approved by the Faculty Higher Degrees Committee and appointed.
The student and the supervisor establish a schedule against which progress may be monitored by the supervisor and the STH Research Committee.
After finalisation of the research output, the research dissertation is submitted to the previously appointed examiners. The student needs to attain the supervisor's approval to submit the dissertation for external assessment. The student is responsible for incorporating the recommendations of the external examiners in collaboration with the supervisor.
The final mark of the dissertation is calculated in accordance with the requirements determined by the Faculty Board, approved by the Senate and contained in the relevant faculty rules and regulations. The results are considered by the relevant Faculty Board for approval and sent to Senate for noting in accordance to the University's Higher Degrees and Postgraduate Studies Policy.
The student, in collaboration with the supervisor, publishes the results in an accredited journal according to UJ and STH policy and procedure.
Formative and Summative Assessment:
In terms of the research component of the proposed qualification, the supervisor will be responsible for the diagnostic and formative assessments of the product in order to provide feedback in terms of the final evaluation criteria. Teaching and learning of research methodology topics are promoted in this manner and is also a way of monitoring student progress.
Internal and external moderation/examination:
External moderators are appointed to ensure the quality of the proposed Master of Tourism and Hospitality Management programme.
The University of Johannesburg requires that moderators should be experienced assessors with knowledge of the learning field, in whom other assessors have confidence and who are experienced Moderators or have undergone training in moderation.
Students' research products are finally evaluated by a suitably qualified, internal examiner and by two suitably qualified external examiners on a Master's Degree level. The process of using two external examiners ensures that internal examination procedures are externally verified.
Students receive written and/or oral feedback on all assessments from the assessor. The date, time and place of feedback are communicated in writing to students as part of the assessment plan.
Where practical, students receive feedback within two weeks of assessment submission. Feedback is provided by one or more of the following methods:
A written assessment feedback report
Marking checklist
One-on-one interview
Verbal feedback
In line with the University of Johannesburg Assessment Policy, assessment results are confidential. An individual student's assessment results are not disclosed to fellow-students or unauthorised staff members. Class lists on notice boards include only the relevant student numbers and the results. Constructive feedback which takes the purpose of the assessment into account is provided. |