|
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
| SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
| REGISTERED QUALIFICATION THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
| Doctor of Technology: Journalism |
| SAQA QUAL ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | |||
| 72347 | Doctor of Technology: Journalism | |||
| ORIGINATOR | ||||
| Tshwane University of Technology (TUT) | ||||
| PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | NQF SUB-FRAMEWORK | |||
| CHE - Council on Higher Education | HEQSF - Higher Education Qualifications Sub-framework | |||
| QUALIFICATION TYPE | FIELD | SUBFIELD | ||
| Doctoral Degree | Field 04 - Communication Studies and Language | Communication Studies | ||
| ABET BAND | MINIMUM CREDITS | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | QUAL CLASS |
| Undefined | 240 | Level 8 and above | NQF Level 10 | Regular-Provider-ELOAC |
| REGISTRATION STATUS | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | |
|
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
SAQA 0695/12 | 2012-07-01 | 2014-12-31 | |
| LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
| 2015-12-31 | 2018-12-31 | |||
| In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This qualification replaces: |
| Qual ID | Qualification Title | Pre-2009 NQF Level | NQF Level | Min Credits | Replacement Status |
| 1295 | Doctor of Technology: Journalism | Level 8 and above | NQF Level 10 | 240 | Complete |
This qualification is replaced by: |
| Qual ID | Qualification Title | Pre-2009 NQF Level | NQF Level | Min Credits | Replacement Status |
| 96880 | Doctor of Journalism | Not Applicable | NQF Level 10 | 360 | Complete |
| PURPOSE AND RATIONALE OF THE QUALIFICATION |
| To enable the learner to make a significant and original contribution to knowledge and practice within the field of journalism demonstrating exceptional knowledge ranging from fundamental concepts to advanced theoretical knowledge and competency. |
| LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
| NQF level 8 (Master of Technology: Journalism) or equivalent
Recognition of prior learning Prior learning to demonstrate competence to handle academic material through to Masters level |
| RECOGNISE PREVIOUS LEARNING? |
| Y |
| EXIT LEVEL OUTCOMES |
| 1. Research a specialised area in the field of journalism or media.
2. Research, apply and develop methods, techniques and knowledge to identify, address and resolve an issue related to the discipline of journalism. Specified outcomes: 1. Write a reasoned and appropriate research proposal F 30 credits (NQF 8) 50 credits (NQF 8) F - 50 credits (NQF 8) 2. Generate original research and analytical methods F 35 credits (NQF 8) 45 credits (NQF 8) 30 credits (NQF 8) |
| ASSOCIATED ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
| 1.The research and its implications are sufficiently understood
The proposal is feasible Justification is given for the proposal The research proposal is relevant and applicable The proposed research involves the development of original and innovative theory and practice The proposal is independently formulated 2.Appropriate and wide range of critical sources is located Information is analysed and choices are made Information is synthesised into a coherent whole Information is gathered independently from supervision 3.Information is appropriately categorised Information is translated into appropriate forms Information is evaluated and informed and innovative recommendations concerning the research, are put forward 4.Methods are at an appropriately high level of complexity Methods are original and innovative refinements of existing methods All major research methods are discussed and compared to the chosen method The merits of the chosen method are defended 5.The design is translated into practice Observations made are consistently and accurately recorded The design and performance are evaluated and suggestions put forward for improvements The research process is successfully managed The research process is carried out independently from the supervisor 6.The thesis is coherently written and laid out according to national and institutional guidelines for level 8 Learning by peers is facilitated through oral and poster presentations and/or in-house seminars Research at lower levels is supervised Critically evaluated research is synthesised into valid commentary and analysis for publication or presentation according to national and institutional guidelines for level 8 Integrated assessment Formative assessment Research thesis Presentation of methodology, analysis and research findings to external panel assessment Peer evaluation by means of publication in an accredited journal, presentations and seminars Supervision at lower levels |
| ARTICULATION OPTIONS |
| Post Doctoral studies |
| MODERATION OPTIONS |
| External moderator according to SERTEC regulations |
| CRITERIA FOR THE REGISTRATION OF ASSESSORS |
| NQF level 8 or equivalent
SERTEC |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
| As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this qualification was Reregistered in 2006; 2009; 2012. |
| LEARNING PROGRAMMES RECORDED AGAINST THIS QUALIFICATION: |
| When qualifications are replaced, some (but not all) of their learning programmes are moved to the replacement qualifications. If a learning programme appears to be missing from here, please check the replaced qualification. |
| NONE |
| PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS QUALIFICATION: |
| This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
| 1. | Tshwane University of Technology (TUT) |
| All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |