All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED QUALIFICATION THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
National Certificate: Financial Services: Long-Term Risk Assessment |
SAQA QUAL ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | |||
49834 | National Certificate: Financial Services: Long-Term Risk Assessment | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Insurance and Investment | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | NQF SUB-FRAMEWORK | |||
INSETA - Insurance Sector Education and Training Authority | OQSF - Occupational Qualifications Sub-framework | |||
QUALIFICATION TYPE | FIELD | SUBFIELD | ||
National Certificate | Field 03 - Business, Commerce and Management Studies | Finance, Economics and Accounting | ||
ABET BAND | MINIMUM CREDITS | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | QUAL CLASS |
Undefined | 120 | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Regular-Unit Stds Based |
REGISTRATION STATUS | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
SAQA 0480/09 | 2009-07-01 | 2012-06-30 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2013-06-30 | 2016-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This qualification does not replace any other qualification and is not replaced by any other qualification. |
PURPOSE AND RATIONALE OF THE QUALIFICATION |
Purpose:
The purpose of the Qualification is to build the knowledge and skills required by employees in Tendering and Quoting who have achieved a School Leaving or professional Qualification equivalent to a FETC and are ready to study at Level 5. It is intended to empower learners to acquire knowledge, skills, attitudes and values required to operate ethically and responsibly as senior Tendering and Quoting Clerks and to respond to the challenges of the economic environment and changing nature of the Financial Services Industry. It should add value to the qualifying learner in terms of enrichment of the person, status, and recognition. As a Qualification in Long-Term Risk Assessment, it provides a framework for learners to develop competencies related to the assessment of non-medical Risk in the Long-Term Insurance Sub-Sector, in general, as well as those specific to Group Retirement Benefits. It provides a balanced learning experience that allows flexible access to life-long learning and to productive employment in Long-Term Insurance. It provides an opportunity for learners to learn and apply academic skills in relation to the workplace and will allow for multi-skilling. It is intended for learners who do not need medical knowledge to assess Long-Term Risk. Underwriters, Claims Assessors and Reinsurers should elect to do the National Diploma in Financial Services: Long-Term Risk Assessment: Level 5 rather than this Certificate. Qualifying learners should be knowledgeable about and competent in: Rationale: The National Certificate in Financial Services: Long-Term Risk Assessment: NQF Level 5 is designed specifically to meet the needs of learners in Tendering and Quoting in the Long-Term Insurance Sector of the Financial Services Industry. It will be useful for Scheme Administrators and learners who work in Scheme Maintenance. It aims to develop informed and skilled learners who are able to assess non-medical risk in Long-Term Insurance, specifically in Group Schemes and Reinsurance. It is intended for learners who: The National Certificate in Financial Services: Long-Term Risk Assessment: NQF Level 5 is flexible enough to accommodate both learners in formal education, in learnerships and learners already employed in the Financial Services Industry. The Qualification at this Level is part of a career path in Long-Term Risk Assessment. It is generic enough to allow maximum mobility between positions in Tendering and Quoting, and Underwriting, Claims and Reinsurance in the Long-Term Insurance industry. The intention is: The skills, knowledge, values and attitudes reflected in the Qualification are building blocks that can be developed further in the National Diploma in Financial Services: Long Term Risk Assessment: NQF Level 5 and in Actuarial Qualifications. Learners already employed in Tendering and Quoting at this Level do work that requires specialised, technical skills and a broad knowledge base of the applicable legislation, economic principles, risk and the Financial Services Industry in general. The National Certificate in Financial Services: Long-Term Risk Assessment: Level 5 should provide the means for current workers to receive Recognition of Prior Learning, to upgrade their skills and achieve a nationally recognised qualification. The qualification is structured in a way that exposes learners to the non-medical knowledge and skills necessary for Long-Term Underwriting, Reinsurance and Claims Assessing. Learners who wish to move into positions as Life Underwriters and/or Claims Assessors or Reinsurers within the Long-Term Insurance Industry, where medical knowledge is essential, may progress to the National Diploma in Financial Services: Long Term Risk Assessment: NQF Level 5 and will receive credits towards that Qualification. |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
Learners should be competent in Communication and Mathematical Literacy at NQF Level 4.
Recognition of Prior Learning: Access to the qualification: There is open access to this Qualification but the Learning assumed to be in place, should be borne in mind. It is preferable that learners should first complete one of the Long-Term Insurance Qualifications at NQF Level 4 before accessing this Qualification. |
RECOGNISE PREVIOUS LEARNING? |
Y |
QUALIFICATION RULES |
Level, credits and learning components assigned to the qualification:
The Certificate is made up of a planned combination of learning outcomes that have a defined purpose and will equip a learner to make decisions at a high level and conduct non-medical risk assessments. It will provide qualifying learners with applied competence and a basis for further training. The Qualification is made up of Unit Standards that are classified as Fundamental, Core and Elective for the purpose of this Qualification. A minimum of 120 credits is required to complete the Qualification. In this Qualification the credits are allocated as follows: Motivation for number of credits assigned to Fundamental, Core and Elective Components The Unit Standards that make up the Certificate are the building blocks of knowledge and skill that are necessary to make a non-medical Long Term Risk Assessment. Fundamental Component (All are compulsory) After wide consultation in the Financial Services industry it was agreed that there should be a common set of Unit Standards that are Fundamental to all Financial Services Qualifications at NQF Level 5 to allow for articulation and portability of Qualifications within the industry. The Unit Standards that are Fundamental in this Qualification are those agreed to at a meeting of the Financial Services Standards Generating Body (FSSGB) on 15 January 2003. They total 41 credits and all are compulsory. Core Component (All are compulsory) 57 credits have been allocated to Unit Standards designated as Core for the purpose of this Qualification. This is to ensure that the Qualification has a definite Risk Assessment focus. They provide an opportunity to develop knowledge through research and the application of knowledge and study skills. The Core Unit Standards provide the knowledge, insight and skills required in the assessment of non-medical related Long-Term Risk. Elective Component The Unit Standards classified as Electives in this Qualification have been carefully selected to allow learners to achieve a Qualification that is relevant to the work that they do and to their chosen career path. They are specifically indicated because of the specialised nature of the work in Tendering and Quoting and to ensure that the there is at least a 60% difference between the National Certificate in Financial Services: Long Term Risk Assessment: NQF Level 5 and the National Diploma in Financial Services: Long Term Risk Assessment: NQF Level 5. Learners are required to select electives that add up to at least 22 credits. |
EXIT LEVEL OUTCOMES |
The National Certificate in Financial Services: Long-Term Risk Assessment: Level 5 is intended for personnel already employed in Tendering and Pricing departments in the industry or learners in learnerships. It will be useful for Scheme Administrators and learners involved in Scheme Maintenance. Learners require an informed understanding of the important terms, rules, concepts, principles and theories of the assessment of non-medical Long-Term Risk. They are required to gather, analyse, interpret, evaluate and synthesis information and to use their knowledge to solve routine, non-standard and unfamiliar problems, to adjust an application of a solution when necessary and to evaluate the change using relevant evidence.
Learners are required to apply communicate information coherently in the language used in Tendering and Pricing contexts and to present and communicate information reliably and accurately verbally and in writing. Learners should have the capacity to take responsibility for their own learning and to take decisions about responsibility for their actions and be able to evaluate their own performance against given criteria. The Exit Level Outcomes and their Associated Assessment Criteria are the following, which means that the learner will be able to: 1. Gather, analyse, synthesise and evaluate information, manipulate and interpret data and identify trends, communicate information coherently in writing and verbally, and show insight into current affairs in the Financial Services sector. 2. Demonstrate insight into the Long-Term Risk Assessment operating environment as a system within the Financial Services Industry, the Long-Term Insurance sector, and the self management of group life risk. 3. Apply knowledge of legislation, ethics, and compliance in order to assess a non-medical related Long-Term Risk, adjust the solution if necessary and evaluate the proposed change using relevant evidence. 4. Apply specialised technical knowledge to assess a non-medical Long-Term risk in a non-standard situation. Exit Level Outcomes for the Critical Cross-Field Outcomes The learner is able to demonstrate ability to: In addition this Qualification contributes to the full personal development of each learner and the social and economic development of the society at large, by making it the underlying intention of any programme of learning to make the individual aware of the importance of: Exit points for learners who do not complete a Qualification |
ASSOCIATED ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
1.
2. 3. 4. Integrated assessment: Assessment practices must be fair, transparent, valid and reliable and should ensure that no learner is disadvantaged. Learners who wish to be assessed against the competencies in the Qualification and/or associated Unit Standards should direct enquiries to the relevant ETQA. The focus of assessment must be on the assessment of the learning outcomes rather than learning outputs. The Specific Outcomes guide the learning and training process towards the outcomes on a continuous basis. The purpose is to determine whether the outcomes have been attained. Situations should present a wide range of options. Applications should require significant choices from a wide range of procedures and in a number of contexts. Learning, teaching and assessment are inextricably linked. Where appropriate, assessment of knowledge, skills, attitudes and values indicated in the various Unit Standards should be integrated. Assessment has a formative monitoring function. Formative assessment should be used to assess gaps in the learners' skill and knowledge and to indicate where there is a need for expanded opportunities. The goal is to promote learning and to assess the efficacy of the teaching and learning process. Feedback from assessment informs teaching and learning and allows for the critique of outcomes, methodology and materials. Formative assessment is diagnostic and as such it should guide the learner and the trainer. It is continuous and is used to plan appropriate learning experiences to meet the learner's needs. It provides information about problems experienced at different stages in the learning process. As it is criterion referenced, if the learner has met the assessment criteria, he/she has achieved the outcomes. Assessment should also have a summative component. Summative assessment may be used on completion of a Unit Standard, but should not be the only form of assessment. A variety of methods must be used in assessment and tools and activities must be appropriate to the context in which the learner is working. Assessment should take place in an authentic context as far as is possible. Where it is not possible to assess competence in the workplace, simulations, case studies and other similar techniques should be used to provide a context appropriate to the assessment. Integration implies that theoretical and practical components should, where possible, be assessed together. Integrative techniques should be used to assess applied competence. Learners should be required to demonstrate that they can perform the outcomes with understanding and insight. Assessment should ensure that all Specific Outcomes, embedded knowledge and Critical Cross-Field Outcomes are evaluated. Assessment of the Critical Cross-Field Outcomes should be integrated with the assessment of the Specific Outcomes. The Critical Cross-Field Outcomes are implicit in some Unit Standards and programmes should be designed to extend and further reflect the integration. Before The National Certificate in Financial Services: Long-Term Risk Assessment: Level 5 is awarded, learners are required to demonstrate competence in the required Unit Standards and complete a summative assessment based on the exit outcomes of the Qualification. |
INTERNATIONAL COMPARABILITY |
South Africa is one of the most advanced Underwriting countries in the world and no other country has such an extensive Broker/Intermediary network. There is a smaller Facultative market in Australia. Both Australia and New Zealand are currently recruiting South African Underwriters as South African Underwriting Skills are held in high regard internationally.
A group of Reinsurers recently visited Canada to compare Underwriting practices in the two countries. It transpired that the Canadians had much to learn from the South Africans. A search for international qualifications to be used for a comparison with the National Certificate in Financial Services: Long Term Risk Assessment: Level 5 was facilitated by previous comparisons for the FETC: Medical Claims Assessing and FETC: Long-Term Risk Assessment. As part of the Level 4 international research, documentation was obtained from the Chartered Insurance Institute in the UK (CII) and the project team responsible for reviewing the financial qualifications for the National Finance Industry Training Advisor in Australia. This formed the basis of the international comparison for the National Certificate in Financial Services: Long Term Risk Assessment: Level 5 and was the reason for the selection of the UK and Australia for the international comparison for the National Certificate in Financial Services: Long Term Risk Assessment: Level 5. The findings of the international comparison were shared with a group of South African Subject Matter Experts who are familiar with the modules offered by the Chartered Insurance Institute in the UK. The South African Qualification and the International Qualifications are very different. The international standards are written by function as opposed to integrated knowledge (seeing the relationship and implications between variables) that is integral to the National Certificate in Financial Services: Long Term Risk Assessment: Level 5. The subject matter experts identified the competencies of skilled workers in Quoting and Tendering and non-medical Claims and Underwriting functions and compared these to topics covered in the international qualification as it was not possible to compare the individual Unit Standards and Outcomes of the National Certificate in Financial Services: Long Term Risk Assessment: Level 5 with the unit standards of the CII. Sites Researched/ Organisations Contacted: UK Australia Background and Rationale for the Choice Of Countries for Comparison with National Certificate In Financial Services: Long-Term Risk Assessment: Level 5. During October and November 2004 the SGB submitted the FETC: Medical Claims Assessing and the FETC: Long Term Risk Assessment Qualifications to SAQA for registration. In the process, a great deal of information was gathered that was relevant to the National Certificate in Financial Services: Long Term Risk Assessment: Level 5. This information also identified trends at Diploma and Degree level internationally and facilitated the identification of Unit Standards to be included in the South African qualification to ensure that it meets international best practice. By utilising existing information and by selecting the same countries for this for comparison, the SGB not only managed to maximise resources and minimise time and costs, without losing quality, but also maintain consistency for the comparison of this cluster of financial standards. For this reason the comparison is based on qualifications sourced from the UK and Australia: United Kingdom (UK) Chartered Insurance Institute (Uk) Advanced Diploma In Insurance, Elective Modules 555: Life and Disability Underwriting, and 555: Module 556 Life and Disability Claims. The CII provides an Advanced Diploma in Insurance, which is set at a UK degree level. The on-line brochures indicate that from 2005 the CII has aligned their courses to NVQ standards. The course outlines are unfortunately not available on the web sites). Two of the units in the advanced diploma are Life and Disability Underwriting and Life and Disability Claims. These are units of study comprising 120 hours of learning each, roughly equivalent to 24 credits on the South African NQF at level 6. The CII kindly provided an overview of the units, which enabled the SGB to compare the Core Unit Standards and outcomes in the proposed qualification with the unit on a broad level. The outcomes of Module 556 are more closely aligned to the non-medical underwriting function and will be used for this comparison. The Module 555 involves the application of medical knowledge and is more relevant to the National Diploma in Financial Services: Long Term Risk Assessment: Level 5. There are no correlations between the Life and disability claims module and the National Certificate in Financial Services: Long Term Risk Assessment: Level 5 which specifically covers the assessment of non-medical long term risk. It must be noted that the overview received from the CII consists only of the units (modules,) and then the topic outlines of the units. There are no unit standards from the CII for the comparison, but CII provided a selection of past exams which assisted in identifying the performance criteria. It is not possible to compare standards to standards, but it is possible to form a general idea by comparing the exit outcomes of the proposed National Certificate in Financial Services: Long Term Risk Assessment: Level 5 to the CII module's units and topics. The units comprising Module 556 - Life and Disability Claims are: The highlighted topics appear to have synergies with the National Certificate in Financial Services: Long Term Risk Assessment: Level 5 which focuses on non-medical long term risk. Many other topics in the Module are dealt with in the FETC: Long-Term Risk Assessment. Australia: Australian National Training Authority, Financial Services Training Package Diploma of Financial Risk Management. The Financial Services Package in Australia is aimed at the whole insurance and banking and accounting market. Their risk management qualification is more generic in terms of risk management strategies than the life underwriting risk management strategies that are familiar in the insurance sector in South Africa. The Diploma of Financial Risk Management provides a cross-industry qualification in Risk Management that is more generic than the proposed National Certificate in Financial Services: Long Term Risk Assessment: Level 5; but there are synergies that make it relevant for comparison. Detailed comparison against exit level outcomes: The South African exit level outcomes are listed below with associated unit standards. CII units and Australian unit standards which have similar outcomes are listed per exit outcomes: 1. Gathering, analysing, synthesising and evaluating information, manipulating and interpreting data and identifying trends, communicating information coherently in writing and verbally, and showing insight into current affairs in the Financial Services sector. Associated SA Unit Standards: Associated CII Modules: > The importance of reviewing the proposal and underwriting papers. > ABI Statement of Long-term Insurance Practice. > Use of the telephone and other forms of communication. > GP reports and notes. > Consultant reports. Associated Australian Standards: The Australian standards appear to be more closely aligned to the South African Qualification. 2. Demonstrating insight into the Long-Term Risk Assessment operating environment as a system within the Financial Services Industry, the Long-Term Insurance sector, and the self management of group life risk. Associated SA Unit Standards: Associated CII Modules: Financial claims assessment - Topics that could have relevance at tendering and quoting stage are highlighted. > Employed. > Self employed. > Employed directors. > Partnerships. > Available benefits. > Assessment and entitlement to those benefits. Associated Australian Standards: 3. Applying knowledge of legislation, ethics, and compliance in order to assess a non-medical related Long-Term Risk, adjust the solution if necessary and evaluate the proposed change using relevant evidence. Associated SA Unit Standards: Associated CII Modules: Note that claims assessment is part of the South African National Diploma in Long-Term Risk Assessment and does not form part of the National Certificate in Long Term Risk Assessment. The full contents of each module are not indicated as they are not relevant to the National Certificate in Long-Term Risk Assessment. Relevant topics are: Associated Australian Standards: 4. Apply specialised technical knowledge to assess a non-medical Long-Term risk in a non-standard situation. Associated SA Unit Standards: Associates CII modules: These areas are covered in Module 555 of the following CII Modules: > Nature of extra risk. > Methods of treating under-average lives and extra risks. > Imposition of additional premiums or restrictions on cover provided. > Mechanism of loading. > Various types of polices in relation to life and disability underwriting and their application to the provision of health care. > The nature of occupational and recreational risks and the impact of these risks on the type of insurance product offered. > Underwriting process and consideration of specific hazardous occupational and recreational risks. The use of special questionnaires. > Increased mortality and morbidity for residential risks and the underwriting process. > Geographical risk for major continents. Exit Level Outcomes for the Critical Cross-Field Outcomes that have synergies with the Australian unit standards: Associated Australian unit standards: Associated Australian unit standards: Associated Australian unit standards: CII modules and/or topics dealing with medical related Long-Term risk assessment do not have synergies with the National Certificate in Financial Services: Long-Term Risk Assessment: Level 5 but are covered in the FETC Long Term Risk Assessment or the National Diploma In Financial Services: Long Term Risk Assessment Level 5. This is because the Certificate deals only with non-medical risk. The National Certificate in Financial Services: Long Term Risk Assessment: Level 5 covers non-medical long term risk in far greater detail than the international qualifications. The medical comparison is therefore irrelevant and is not included in this comparison. Conclusion Competent learners achieving the South African and Australian standards will have acquired risk management strategies that are Fit for Purpose in the environments in which they work. In South Africa, there is a more specialised set of competencies for Tendering and Quoting for Group Retirement Funds, and in Australia there is a focus on broader risk management strategies that could provide a foundation to specialise in any risk management career. The CII module is more related to claims assessment and has some overlaps with the SA and Australian standards. It does not appear that the international qualifications allow for learners who are neither Underwriters nor Claims Assessors but nevertheless assess Long-Term Risk for Group Retirement Funds under the management of Actuaries. The main differences are listed below. |
ARTICULATION OPTIONS |
This Qualification articulates horizontally with:
As this is a Level 5 Qualification it should provide the learner with access to any Qualification at Level 6, subject to the admission requirements of the provider/Higher Education Institutions. |
MODERATION OPTIONS |
This Qualification will be internally assessed and externally moderated by a moderator registered by a relevant accredited ETQA, or an ETQA that has a Memorandum of Understanding with the relevant accredited ETQA.
|
CRITERIA FOR THE REGISTRATION OF ASSESSORS |
This Qualification will be internally assessed by the provider and moderated by a moderator registered by a relevant accredited ETQA or an ETQA that has a Memorandum of Understanding with the relevant accredited ETQA.
|
NOTES |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARDS: |
ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS | |
Core | 120010 | Apply a researched trend to refine non-medical risk assessments in terms of avocation and occupation | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 10 |
Core | 120007 | Apply technical knowledge of Long-Term risk to make a competitive business decision in a non-standard situation | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 10 |
Core | 119996 | Evaluate the inherent risk to an organisation in a specific market | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 10 |
Core | 120003 | Interpret how current trends impact on risk profiles | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 15 |
Core | 14505 | Apply the principles of ethics and professionalism to a business environment | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | 6 |
Core | 14510 | Demonstrate knowledge and insight into the impact of HIV/AIDS on financial products, markets and the workforce | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | 6 |
Fundamental | 14517 | Apply basic economic principles to the financial services sector | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 5 |
Fundamental | 120075 | Demonstrate insight into current affairs in the Financial Services sector | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 10 |
Fundamental | 14518 | Demonstrate knowledge and insight into the changing nature of the financial services industry and its consumers | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 6 |
Fundamental | 119997 | Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of risk in a Financial Services environment | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 5 |
Fundamental | 14523 | Describe the financial life cycle of an individual | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 10 |
Fundamental | 14525 | Present an informed argument on a current issue in a business sector | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 5 |
Elective | 120004 | Analyse a facultative arrangement in order to comment on its appropriateness to a specific organisation's underwriting framework | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 6 |
Elective | 114206 | Analyse the strategic impact of a successful wellness programme | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 5 |
Elective | 14509 | Apply a researched trend to individual financial risk | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 5 |
Elective | 119999 | Apply actuarial knowledge to the assessment of risk in long term insurance | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 12 |
Elective | 120002 | Apply knowledge of legislation, product features and risk to modify terms and conditions for a specific group risk contract | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 4 |
Elective | 14530 | Apply scenario planning to explain potential risk in a specified financial services context | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 6 |
Elective | 119998 | Apply technical knowledge and insight to manage the risks inherent in a group scheme | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 8 |
Elective | 15096 | Demonstrate an understanding of stress in order to apply strategies to achieve optimal stress levels in personal and work situations | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 5 |
Elective | 15094 | Demonstrate insight into the application of theories of Emotional and Spiritual Intelligence in personal development | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 5 |
Elective | 120000 | Identify and analyse risk information that could impact on underwriting and/or pricing in the long term insurance industry | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 12 |
Elective | 120001 | Negotiate terms on a facultative basis to achieve a competitive advantage | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 6 |
LEARNING PROGRAMMES RECORDED AGAINST THIS QUALIFICATION: |
NONE |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS QUALIFICATION: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |