|
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
| SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
| REGISTERED QUALIFICATION THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
| Doctor of Technology: Chiropractic |
| SAQA QUAL ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | |||
| 16652 | Doctor of Technology: Chiropractic | |||
| ORIGINATOR | ||||
| Committee of Technikon Principals | ||||
| PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | NQF SUB-FRAMEWORK | |||
| Was CHE until Last Date for Achievement | HEQSF - Higher Education Qualifications Sub-framework | |||
| QUALIFICATION TYPE | FIELD | SUBFIELD | ||
| Doctoral Degree | Field 09 - Health Sciences and Social Services | Promotive Health and Developmental Services | ||
| ABET BAND | MINIMUM CREDITS | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | QUAL CLASS |
| Undefined | 240 | Level 8 and above | NQF Level 10 | Regular-Provider-ELOAC |
| REGISTRATION STATUS | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | |
|
Passed the End Date - Status was "Registered" |
SAQA 1536/01 | 2003-07-01 | 2006-06-30 | |
| LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
| 2007-06-30 | 2010-06-30 | |||
| In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This qualification is replaced by: |
| Qual ID | Qualification Title | Pre-2009 NQF Level | NQF Level | Min Credits | Replacement Status |
| 72093 | Doctor of Technology: Chiropractic | Level 8 and above | NQF Level 10 | 240 | Complete |
| 73923 | Doctor of Technology: Chiropractic | Level 8 and above | NQF Level 10 | 240 | Complete |
| PURPOSE AND RATIONALE OF THE QUALIFICATION |
| Persons achieving this qualification will be competent scientific researchers who can work independently in developing and applying knowledge and skills to make an original contribution to the global knowledge or to technology in the field of chiropractic. |
| LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
| M Tech: Chiropractic or equivalent NQF Level 8, 600-credit Masters degree in related disciplines. |
| RECOGNISE PREVIOUS LEARNING? |
| N |
| EXIT LEVEL OUTCOMES |
| One
1. Demonstrate in-depth knowledge and understanding of the field or area of investigation. * Demonstrate in-depth knowledge of the scope of relevant knowledge in the selected field or area of research. 30 credits (C) NQF 8. 2. Demonstrate understanding of the particular field or area chosen. 30 credits (C), NQF 8. Two 2. Apply research methods and techniques appropriately and correctly in order to make an original contribution to global knowledge and insight in the particular field or discipline chosen. 1. Plan, design, motivate, budget for and conduct a comprehensive scientific research project. 60 credits (C), NQF level 8). 2. Critically analyse, evaluate and interpret the findings. 60 credits (core, NQF level 8) 3. Report the findings in a thesis and in scientific format for international consumption. 60 credits (C), NQF 8. Critical outcomes embedded in the specific outcomes: 1. Identifying and solving of problems and thinking critically and creatively in designing, executing and reporting on a specialised area of chiropractic 2. Collecting, organising, analysing and evaluating of information and synthesis of a logical, valid, original contribution to global knowledge and technology 3. Working effectively with specialised scientists in the particular field at a high academic level 4. Managing one`s own time to achieve the study and exposition of the thesis 5. Communication in scientific terms in internationally acceptable style, both verbally and in written form 6. Using science and technology to contribute original knowledge or technology in the field chosen for study |
| ASSOCIATED ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
| One
1. The listed and cited literature of the literature survey, and the exposition of the research, reflect mastery of relevant and recent trends in technologies, techniques, models and theories in the chosen field or area. 2. Models, principles, theories, techniques and methodologies in the chosen field or area are analysed, explained and juxtaposed correctly in oral presentations and the written record of research. Two 1. The research problem is clearly identified, defined, and detailed in the research proposal. * Appropriate techniques and methods are selected. * Budget for the research is accurate, honest and responsible. * Experimental research is responsibly and ethically conducted. 2. The appropriate mathematical and statistical methods are applied correctly to qualitative and quantitative data * Logical interpretation of data reflects clear understanding of the relationship between facts in the study and the ability to evaluate contradictory information * The inferences, interpretations and conclusions from measurements and analyses are valid. 3. Information sources are used correctly and appropriately. * Information technology skills are applied effectively in production of the thesis. * Language and numeracy skills are applied effectively and correctly in clearly communicating the research problem, its investigation, the outcome and the recommendations. * New knowledge or technology or solution to a problem is contributed and published in appropriate journals. * Findings are presented at an appropriate conference. Integrated assessment: Formative assessment: Oral presentations Research proposal Written progress reports Summative assessment: Research thesis Publications in journals Conference presentations |
| ARTICULATION OPTIONS |
| This is the pinnacle of academic achievement and therefore is not followed by any formal qualification. However, post-doctoral studies would be the next academic application for such a qualified learner. |
| MODERATION OPTIONS |
| SERTEC (currently) and the Allied Health Service Professions Council. |
| CRITERIA FOR THE REGISTRATION OF ASSESSORS |
| SERTEC (currently). |
| NOTES |
| While South Africa still had Technikons, all of their qualifications were registered under the Committee of Technikon Principals. After the Technikons became Universities of Technology or merged with Universities, the qualifications were registered under each of these institutions, and the CTP qualifications fell away (hence the end date of 2006, above). Where relevant, replacement information is s hown in the table above. |
| LEARNING PROGRAMMES RECORDED AGAINST THIS QUALIFICATION: |
| When qualifications are replaced, some of their learning programmes are moved to being recorded against the replacement qualifications. If a learning programme appears to be missing from here, please check the replacement. |
| NONE |
| PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS QUALIFICATION: |
| This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
| NONE |
| All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |