SAQA All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source.
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY 
REGISTERED QUALIFICATION: 

Master of Computing 
SAQA QUAL ID QUALIFICATION TITLE
120765  Master of Computing 
ORIGINATOR
University of Mpumalanga 
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY NQF SUB-FRAMEWORK
CHE - Council on Higher Education  HEQSF - Higher Education Qualifications Sub-framework 
QUALIFICATION TYPE FIELD SUBFIELD
Master's Degree  Field 10 - Physical, Mathematical, Computer and Life Sciences  Information Technology and Computer Sciences 
ABET BAND MINIMUM CREDITS PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL NQF LEVEL QUAL CLASS
Undefined  180  Not Applicable  NQF Level 09  Regular-Provider-ELOAC 
REGISTRATION STATUS SAQA DECISION NUMBER REGISTRATION START DATE REGISTRATION END DATE
Registered  EXCO 0815/23  2023-04-18  2026-04-18 
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT
2027-04-18   2030-04-18  

In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise.  

This qualification does not replace any other qualification and is not replaced by any other qualification. 

PURPOSE AND RATIONALE OF THE QUALIFICATION 
Purpose:
The primary purpose of the Master of Computing is to provide learners with an opportunity to undertake independent research under supervision and contribute to the development of knowledge at an advanced level. During the process of undertaking the research project, learners will gain experience in all aspects of the research process and develop a deep and current understanding of the theories, ideas, and practices in their area of specialisation.

On the completion of the qualification, qualifying learners will be able to:
  • Undertake independent research and report on this to reflect independent thinking, originality, critical analysis, ability to defend findings and advanced insight into the chosen field of research.
  • Engage critically with current research in a field of specialisation in the computational sciences.
  • Demonstrate an advanced understanding of the boundaries, interconnections, value, and knowledge creation systems of the chosen discipline/s within the computational sciences and an ability to critically evaluate these and select an appropriate research paradigm to use for the research project.
  • Select, apply, and modify where necessary research methods including experimental design, data collection, data analysis and statistics to address a particular research question.
  • Within the system being studied, and based on the outcomes of the research, draw appropriate conclusions, propose interventions at a policy or management level that address the problem being researched, and fully discuss any possible negative consequences.
  • Act reflectively, ethically and with integrity and be accountable for own work, actions, decisions, and learning.
  • Use science and technology effectively and critically, showing responsibility to the environment and the health and welfare of others and with due consideration to cultural differences.
  • Manage, collate, critically evaluate, and synthesise information from a range of sources relevant to the field of specialisation.
  • Communicate effectively and efficiently with both professional and lay audiences using appropriate language, academic discourse, and technology. Defend new ideas using logical argumentation that is supported by data.
  • Have responsible and effective personal organization skills, work independently, and incorporate feedback into one's work, taking full responsibility for allocated resources.

    Rationale:
    Most industries rely on data and software programmes as computing impacts everything, from scientific research to developments in medicine and health, transport, banking, agriculture, and tourism as well as communication and computing is a fast-evolving discipline that is driven by research and development and that the need for highly qualified researchers is ever-present. The qualification will contribute to existing and new knowledge in Information Computer and Technology (ICT) management which could reduce the shortage of skills in the IT field and help develop sustainable retention strategies in South Africa.

    The advent of the COVID-19 pandemic saw many new organizations joining the virtual world resulting in an enormous increase in the use of e-services. The fourth industrial revolution has also created a greater need for Information Technology (IT) professionals. Graduates from the qualification will contribute towards meeting the demand for highly skilled researchers in ICT and computing and contribute to the continued development of the discipline. The qualification will supply the industry with highly skilled staff with the ability to undertake original research and development in ICT and computing and to apply their knowledge and skills to address the pressing problems that face the nation.

    The qualification is intended for learners who completed an Honours Degree or Postgraduate Diploma and will be looking to develop their research abilities. Learners may enter the Master's directly from their undergraduate and Honours Degrees or Postgraduate Diplomas, but others will have spent time in the industry.
    Upon completion of the qualification, learners will be able to progress to doctoral studies and undertake further independent research and contribute to the generation of new knowledge and the production of the next generation of academics. Graduates with this qualification will find work in a wide range of careers including for governmental and non-governmental organizations, in the private sector, for themselves as entrepreneurs, as research scientists, or they may continue to doctoral studies with employment possibly in academia.

    The design of this qualification was informed by the curricula guidelines provided by the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and other higher education institutions. The qualification is therefore aligned with international best practices.

    Learners will benefit through the development of advanced knowledge and skills in research and development and improved employment opportunities. Economic benefits will depend on the area in which research is undertaken but the cross-cutting nature of Information Communication Technology and its application should ensure that graduates and their future work will bring economic benefits to the country. The focus of research and development will be on addressing socio-economic problems in a range of areas and society will benefit directly from the research. 
    		•

    LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING 
    Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL):
    The institution has an approved Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) policy which is applicable to equivalent qualifications for admission into the qualification. RPL will be applied to accommodate applicants who qualify. RPL thus provides alternative access and admission to qualifications, as well as advanced standing within qualifications. RPL may be applied for access, credits from modules and credits for or towards the qualification.

    RPL for access:
  • Learners who do not meet the minimum entrance requirements or the required qualification at the same NQF level as the qualification required for admission may be considered for admission through RPL.
  • To be considered for admission in the qualification based on RPL, applicants should provide evidence in the form of a portfolio that demonstrates that they have acquired the relevant knowledge, skills, and competencies through formal, non-formal and/or informal learning to cope with the qualification expectations should they be allowed entrance into the qualification.

    Entry Requirements:
    The minimum entry requirement for this qualification is:
  • Bachelor of Science Honours in Computing, NQF Level 8.
    Or
  • Bachelor of Commerce Honours in Information Technology Management, NQF Level 8.
    Or
  • Bachelor of Computer and Information Sciences Honours, NQF Level 8.
    Or
  • Bachelor of Information Technology Honours in Information Systems, NQF Level 8.
    Or
  • Postgraduate Diploma in Computer Science, NQF Level 8.
    Or
  • Bachelor Honours in Information and Communication Technology, NQF Level 8.
    Or
  • Postgraduate Diploma in Multimedia Computing, NQF Level 8.
    Or
  • Postgraduate Diploma in an appropriate field, NQF Level 8. 
    		•

    RECOGNISE PREVIOUS LEARNING? 
    Y 

    QUALIFICATION RULES 
    This qualification consists of the following compulsory modules at National Qualifications Framework Level 9 totalling 180 Credits.

    Compulsory Modules, Level 9, 180 Credits:
  • Full Research Dissertation, 180 Credits. 
    		•

    EXIT LEVEL OUTCOMES 
    1. Undertake independent research and report on this to reflect independent thinking, originality, critical analysis, ability to defend findings and advanced insight into the chosen field of research.
    2. Demonstrate specialist knowledge and an ability to engage critically with current research in a field of specialisation in the computational sciences.
    3. Demonstrate an advanced understanding of the boundaries, interconnections, value, and knowledge creation systems of the chosen discipline/s within the computational sciences and an ability to critically evaluate these and select an appropriate research paradigm to use for the research project.
    4. Demonstrate the ability to select, apply, and modify where necessary research methods including experimental design, data collection, data analysis and statistics to address a particular research question.
    5. Within the system being studied, and based on the outcomes of the research, draw appropriate conclusions, propose interventions at a policy or management level that address the problem being researched, and fully discuss any possible negative consequences.
    6. Act reflectively, ethically and with integrity and be accountable for own work, actions, decisions, and learning.
    7. Use science and technology effectively and critically, showing responsibility to the environment and the health and welfare of others and with due consideration to cultural differences.
    8. Demonstrate the ability to manage, collate, critically evaluate, and synthesise information from a range of sources relevant to the field of specialisation.
    9. Communicate effectively and efficiently with both professional and lay audiences using appropriate language, academic discourse, and technology. Defend new ideas using logical argumentation that is supported by data.
    10. Demonstrate the ability to work independently and incorporate feedback into one's work, taking full responsibility for allocated resources. 

    ASSOCIATED ASSESSMENT CRITERIA 
    Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 1:
  • Describe the project question and scope clearly.
  • Conduct the literature review comprehensively drawing information from a range of primary sources, and critically evaluate that information.
  • Develop a comprehensive and achievable project plan adhering to the required format.
  • Select appropriate methods and fully justify them.
  • Consider and address ethical issues.
  • Collect and analyse data or information in accordance with the project proposal and plan.
  • Interpret and integrate data into the existing canon of knowledge.
  • Clearly formulate recommendations and support the data.
  • Prepare the dissertation according to the prescribed format, write in appropriate academic language and avoid plagiarism.
  • Work independently, albeit under supervision, and compile the reflective journal.

    Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 2:
  • Critically evaluate current and contemporary concepts, theories, and methods in specialisation and discuss them in detail in the dissertation.
  • Skillfully incorporate own results from the research project into the existing canon of knowledge in the dissertation.
  • Integrate and apply knowledge from the major disciplines within the area of specialisation to sustain and support a discussion in the dissertation.

    Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 3:
  • Apply the different research paradigms in the dissertation.
  • Analyse the nature, strengths, and limitations of research paradigms in the dissertation.
  • Identify the appropriate research process or paradigm for the project, justify and properly implement it.

    Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 4:
  • Fully justify the selected research methods for the project.
  • Carefully apply the research methods to provide reliable results.
  • Discuss the potential weaknesses in the chosen methods and account for the analysis of the results.
  • Correctly interpret and report the statistical analyses.

    Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 5:
  • Successfully manage uncertainty, incomplete data, and limited information in the decision-making process.
  • Fully support decisions and recommendations by the results.
  • Discuss recommendations and conclusions highlighting any possible negative consequences and provide comprehensive mitigating measures.

    Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 6:
  • Reflect on social and ethical issues, include all recommendations, and propose solutions to the identified problem.
  • Obtain ethical approval before research begins.
  • Solicit and engage positively and use constructive feedback to improve work.
  • Adhere to deadlines and submit all assignments in accordance with provided guidelines.
  • Use allocated resources responsibly with minimal wastage.

    Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 7:
  • Apply science in a responsible manner in the dissertation.
  • Critically evaluate potential environmental concerns that may result from the research and appropriately mitigate proposed measures.
  • Critically evaluate any possible effects on the health and welfare of people and appropriately mitigate the proposed measures.

    Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 8:
  • Use the references in the dissertation including the most recent work.
  • Critically review and analyse the existing knowledge in the introduction and discussion chapters of the dissertation.
  • Access, critically evaluate, and include information from a wide range of sources in the dissertation.
  • Manage the contradictory information well, consider alternative viewpoints and reach a balanced conclusion.

    Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 9:
  • Communicate the results from the research project to both professional and non-specialist audiences using appropriate language and technology.
  • Communicate complex concepts, ideas, and theories.
  • Present clear and engaging presentations within the given time.
  • Use appropriate academic language in the dissertation and present in the approved style and adhere to norms for scientific writing.
  • Use accurately and consistently standard referencing styles in the dissertation.
  • Produce a dissertation without plagiarism.

    Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 10:
  • Critically analyse and incorporate the written and verbal feedback into drafts of the dissertation.
  • Complete the research project in accordance with the agreed Project Plan.

    INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT
    The assessment is informed by the institution's assessment policy. Assessment is understood to be integral to effective teaching and learning and is integrated into a module from the module design stage.

    Assessment of learning will be both formative and summative. In formative assessment, learners will be provided with a range of assessment opportunities throughout the module and the feedback will be used by learners to improve their learning. In this developmental approach to assessment, assessment tasks are provided regularly and are closely aligned with the learning outcomes of a module; comprehensive feedback is provided to help learners learn; and opportunities are provided for learners to demonstrate that their learning has developed or progressed. Through this, learners are empowered in the assessment process and are assisted to monitor their learning. In summative assessment, the extent to which learners have achieved the outcomes will be assessed at the end of a module.

    There will be a formative assessment at the stage of research proposal writing and submission of a proposal, ethics application and approval, developing research chapters on the approved proposal, instrumentation and data collection, and verbal and written presentation of the thesis or logical argument. All learners will present a research seminar at least once each year, and this will be another opportunity for critique and feedback.

    Formative Assessment:
    Although the assessment of the qualification is mainly summative with all 180 credits based on the dissertation, formative assessment is embedded in the programme in the following manner.
  • Learner and supervisor agree on and co-sign a Learning Agreement which will detail the expectations of learner and supervisor and the supervisory process and frequency of formal meetings.
  • The research process includes several formal stages including the submission of a research proposal, submission of a literature review and submission of regular progress reports.
  • Preparation of the dissertation requires submission of drafts of the chapters.
  • Postgraduate learners will receive verbal and written feedback (formative assessment) on their work and their progress.
  • All learners will present a research seminar at least once each year and this will be another opportunity for critique and feedback.
  • All learners will participate in at least one Community of Practice, and this will be another opportunity for critique and feedback. While these assessment activities are not credit-bearing, they will ensure that learners are regularly assessed on progress.
  • When the opportunity arises, learners will be encouraged to make presentations at local conferences.

    Summative Assessment:
    The final summative assessment is based on the dissertation. Assessment will be by two external examiners. 
    		•

    INTERNATIONAL COMPARABILITY 
    Master's degrees in computing are offered in a range of different formats around the world with most including some compulsory coursework modules. The weighting of the coursework component varies from more than 50% in Masters by coursework and thesis to zero in a few of the Masters by research. Interestingly, most of the Master's by research include a few coursework modules, typically focussing on developing research skills. In some cases, these are credit-bearing and may or may not be compulsory for all learners. The comparisons provided below focus on three examples.

    Country: Australia
    Institution: Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT)
    Qualification Title: Master of Science in Computer Science.
    Duration: Two years full time
    Entry requirements:
  • A Bachelor's degree requiring at least four years of full-time study in a relevant discipline awarded with honours. The degree should include a research component comprised of a thesis, other research projects or research methodology courses that constitute at least 25% of a full-time academic year (or part-time equivalent).
    Or
  • Evidence of appropriate academic qualifications and/or experience that satisfies the Associate Deputy Vice-Chancellor, Research Training and Development or nominee that the applicant has developed knowledge of the field of study or cognate field and the potential for research sufficient to undertake the proposed program.

    Exit Level Outcomes:
    Graduates of a Master of Science by research will have:
  • A body of knowledge that includes the understanding of recent development in one or more disciplines.
  • Advanced knowledge of research principles and methods applicable to the field of work or learning.
  • Cognitive skills to demonstrate mastery of theoretical knowledge and to reflect critically on theory and its application.
  • Cognitive, technical, and creative skills to investigate, analyse and synthesise complex information, problems, concepts, and theories and to apply established theories to different bodies of knowledge or practice.
  • Cognitive, technical, and creative skills to generate and evaluate complex ideas and concepts at an abstract level.
  • Cognitive and technical skills to design, use and evaluate research and research methods.
  • Communication and technical skills to present coherent and sustained arguments and to disseminate research results to specialist and non-specialist audiences.
  • Technical and communication skills to design, evaluate, implement, analyse, theorise, and disseminate research that contributes to knowledge.
  • Creativity and initiative in new situations and/or for further learning.
  • High level of personal autonomy and accountability.
  • To plan and execute a substantial piece of research.

    Qualification structure:
    The qualification includes one compulsory module on research methods for 12 credits and 120 credits for the research project and dissertation.

    Compulsory Coursework Modules (Complete the following One (1) Course prior to the first milestone review (confirmation of candidature):
  • Doing Research for Engineering and Computing, 12 Credits.
    Or
  • Research for Impact in Engineering and Computing, 12 Credits.
    And
    In consultation with the supervisory team, take One (1) of the following Courses during the candidature:
  • Quantitative Research Techniques, 12 Credits.
  • Qualitative Research Methods, 12 Credits.
  • Bioinformatics and Multi-Omics Data Analysis, 12 Credits.
  • Digital Technologies, 12 Credits.
    And
    In consultation with the supervisory team, a learner may also opt to take up to 12 credit points of approved university research electives:
    And
    Thesis Courses, 120 Credits:
    The remaining allocation of credit points for each semester should be made up of the following Modules:
  • Masters Research, 48 Credits.
  • Masters Research, 36 Credits.
  • Masters Research, 24 Credits.
  • Masters Research, 12 Credits.

    Similarities:
  • The Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT) and the South African (SA) qualifications are offered over a period of two years of full-time study.
  • Both qualifications require applicants who completed the Honour's Degree in the cognate field.
  • Both qualifications develop the same graduate attributes.
  • The RMIT and SA qualifications articulate vertically into the Doctoral Degree in the related field.

    Differences:
    The RMIT qualification consists of compulsory research modules and thesis modules of 120 Credits whereas the SA qualification consists of the full research dissertation which has 180 Credits and no coursework modules.

    Country: United Kingdom
    Institution: The University of Worcester
    Qualification Title: Computing MPhil by Research
    Duration: Two years full-time.
    Entry Requirements:
  • First or Upper Second-Class Honours Degree or an approved equivalent award.
    Or
  • The applicant has appropriate research or professional experience at the postgraduate level which has resulted in published work, written reports, or other appropriate evidence of achievement.

    Purpose:
    The qualification aims to equip learners with the skills to design, research and write a research-based project to the standard expected at postgraduate level. The thesis may either be a record of original work or an ordered and critical exposition of existing knowledge and will provide evidence that the field has been thoroughly surveyed.

    Learners completing the qualification will have acquired a range of analytical and presentational skills appropriate to a wide range of professional activities and will be able to:
  • Frame questions about complex problems and conduct research at a high level to answer those questions.
  • Offer critical appraisal of other research in the field.
  • Gather evidence of different kinds from different sources.
  • Demonstrate understanding and utilise a range of research methods together with their implementation in analysis.
  • Present arguments consistent with such evidence and analysis and present their research findings effectively in both oral and written form.

    Assessment:
    The assessment of the qualification is based on a two-stage process:
  • An assessment of a written thesis (and where appropriate other documentation or artefacts such as a performance, exhibition, or artwork) by an examination panel of 2-3 examiners, who are experts in the field of study.
  • An oral examination at which the learner is asked to defend their thesis in front of the same examination panel, demonstrating that the written thesis is their work, that they are aware of its strengths and weaknesses and that they can explain and justify any issues or problems in the written thesis.

    Similarities:
  • The University of Worcester (UW) and the South African (SA) qualifications are offered over two years of full-time study.
  • Both qualifications require applicants who completed the Honour's Degree in the related field.
  • The UW and SA qualifications share the same learning outcomes.
  • The main mode of teaching in both qualifications is supervision from a team of experts who provide guidance and support and feedback on the learner's programme of research at all stages from its inception to its implementation to the delivery of the thesis.
  • Both qualifications are assessed through formative and summative assessments.
  • Both qualifications articulate vertically into the Doctoral Degree in the related field.

    Differences:
  • In the first-year learners complete three research-based modules and plan their research, which is undertaken in the second year of the UW qualification.
  • The research coursework in the UW qualification is packaged as a Postgraduate Certificate in Research Methods and all learners must pass this during the early stages of the qualification to develop the skills, knowledge and understanding to plan, design and implement a programme of research. This is not the case with the SA qualification where learners get equivalent training during the Honours year which includes a compulsory 30-credit research project.

    Country: United Kingdom
    Institution: Swansea University
    Qualification Title: The Master of Science by Research in Theoretical Computer Science
    NQF Level: Frameworks for Higher Education Qualifications (FHEQ) Level 7
    Duration: One year full-time or two years part-time
    Entry Requirements:
    Applicants must normally hold an undergraduate degree at 2.1 level (or non-UK equivalent as defined by Swansea University).

    Purpose:
    The qualification will provide learners with the opportunity to conduct high-quality postgraduate research in a world-leading research environment, key skills needed to undertake advanced academic and non-academic research including qualitative and quantitative data analysis and advanced critical thinking, intellectual curiosity, and independent judgement.
    The Master's is a highly respected qualification which can enable a future career in academia or a wider scope for employment in fields such as education, government, or the private sector.

    Exit Level Outcomes:
    Upon successful completion of the qualification, learners should be able to:
  • Critically reflect on the existing knowledge base, current problems and/or new insights, in the field of Computer Science.
  • Demonstrate originality in the application of knowledge, together with a practical understanding of how established techniques of research and enquiry are used to create and interpret knowledge in the discipline.
  • Apply research skills, methodologies, and subject theory to the practice of research, create, interpret, and analyse knowledge in the specific field of study through original research.
  • Undertake research tasks and make informed judgements with minimum guidance.
  • Apply sound ethical principles to research, with due regard for the integrity of persons and in accordance with professional codes of conduct.
  • Demonstrate self-awareness of individual and cultural diversity, and the reciprocal impact in social interaction between self and others when conducting research involving people.
  • Demonstrate self-direction and originality in tackling and solving problems, and act autonomously in planning and implementing tasks at a professional or equivalent level.
  • Approach and resolve complex issues both systematically and creatively, make sound judgements in the absence of complete data, and communicate their conclusions clearly to specialist and non-specialist audiences.
  • Evaluate and apply relevant techniques for research in Human-Computer Interaction.
  • Apply research methodologies and develop critiques of them and, where appropriate, propose new hypotheses.
  • Work in groups, presenting conclusions and reflecting a difference of opinion.
  • Implement independent research skills.
  • Locate information and apply it to research practice.
  • Design and implement a research project.
  • Display the qualities and transferable skills necessary for employment, including the exercise of personal responsibility and initiative in complex situations, the exercise of initiative and personal responsibility, decision-making in complex and unpredictable situations and the independent learning ability required for continuing professional development.

    Qualification Structure:
    The qualification comprises three key elements:
  • Entry and confirmation of candidature.
  • Main body of research.
  • Thesis and viva voce examination.

    Assessment:
    Learners for the Master's by Research in Theoretical Computer Science are examined in two parts.
    The first part is a thesis which is an original body of work representing the methods and results of the research project. The word limit is 40,000 for the main text. The word limit does not include appendices (if any), essential footnotes, introductory parts and statements or the bibliography and index.
    The second part is an oral examination (viva voce).

    Similarities:
  • The SU and SA qualifications require applicants who completed the Honour's Degree in the related field.
  • Both qualifications comprise the undertaking of an original research project of one-year duration full-time and two years duration part-time.
  • Both qualifications develop the same research competencies and exit learning outcomes.
  • Both qualifications consist of research only and no coursework.

    Conclusion:
    In the three examples provided, there is a similarity in the goals and the outcomes with the SA qualification. Differences include the inclusion of compulsory modules in research methods. As indicated earlier, the inclusion of research methods modules is necessary because the preceding degree does not include any original research, whilst this is not the case in South Africa. 
    		•

    ARTICULATION OPTIONS 
    This qualification allows possibilities for both vertical and horizontal articulation.

    Horizontal Articulation:
  • Master of Computer and Information Sciences, NQF Level 9.
  • Master of Philosophy in Computer and Information Sciences, NQF Level 9.
  • Master of Science in Computer Science, NQF Level 9.
  • Master of Information Technology, NQF Level 9.
  • Master of Information Science, NQF Level 9.
  • Master of Commerce in Information Systems and Technology, NQF Level 9.
  • Master of Commerce in Information Technology Management, NQF Level 9.
  • Master of Information and Communication Technology, NQF Level 9.
  • Master of Philosophy in Computer and Information Sciences, NQF Level 9.
  • Master of Philosophy in Information Management, NQF Level 9.
  • Master of Science in Information Technology Management, NQF Level 9.

    Vertical Articulation:
  • Doctor of Computing, NQF Level 10.
  • Doctor of Philosophy in Computer Science NQF Level 10.
  • Doctor of Philosophy in Information Systems NQF Level 10.
  • Doctor of Philosophy in Information Technology Management NQF Level 10. 
    		•

    MODERATION OPTIONS 
    N/A 

    CRITERIA FOR THE REGISTRATION OF ASSESSORS 
    N/A 

    NOTES 
    N/A 

    LEARNING PROGRAMMES RECORDED AGAINST THIS QUALIFICATION: 
     
    NONE 


    PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS QUALIFICATION: 
    This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here.
     
    1. University of Mpumalanga 


    All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source.