|
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
| SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
| REGISTERED QUALIFICATION: |
| Postgraduate Diploma in Investigative and Forensic Accounting |
| SAQA QUAL ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | |||
| 115166 | Postgraduate Diploma in Investigative and Forensic Accounting | |||
| ORIGINATOR | ||||
| University of Pretoria | ||||
| PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | NQF SUB-FRAMEWORK | |||
| CHE - Council on Higher Education | HEQSF - Higher Education Qualifications Sub-framework | |||
| QUALIFICATION TYPE | FIELD | SUBFIELD | ||
| Postgraduate Diploma | Field 03 - Business, Commerce and Management Studies | Generic Management | ||
| ABET BAND | MINIMUM CREDITS | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | QUAL CLASS |
| Undefined | 120 | Not Applicable | NQF Level 08 | Regular-Provider-ELOAC |
| REGISTRATION STATUS | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | |
| Reregistered | EXCO 0335/25 | 2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 | |
| LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
| 2028-06-30 | 2031-06-30 | |||
| In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This qualification does not replace any other qualification and is not replaced by any other qualification. |
| PURPOSE AND RATIONALE OF THE QUALIFICATION |
| Purpose:
The purpose of the Postgraduate Diploma in Investigative and Forensic Accounting is to equip learners with the knowledge and skills to prevent, detect and investigate economic crimes and other fraud-related misconduct in the public and private sector contexts in South Africa. The qualification builds on the premise that professional conduct which seeks to prevent, detect and investigate economic crimes, should withstand judicial scrutiny in criminal, civil and disciplinary proceedings. Rationale: On a national and international level, economic crime poses a significant threat to the stability of financial systems and democratic institutions. The reason for developing this qualification is to attend to the need to ensure that economic crimes (such as fraud and corruption) are ethically, fully and properly investigated with due regard to the plethora of relevant national and international laws and regulations. Forensic Investigations are multi-disciplinary and liaison with professional bodies and players in the industry ensures that the curricula remain relevant and up-to-date. Regular consultations with the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (an internationally recognised body with a South African Chapter) as well as the Institute of Commercial Forensic Practitioners (ICFP) are held in this regard. Typical learners for this qualification are amongst others, law enforcement officials, fraud examiners, compliance officers, forensic accountants, auditors and legal practitioners. The most appropriate learning pathway is a blended learning approach, which entails contact sessions as well as e-learning activities. This learning pathway facilitates peer learning and social learning and exposes learners to experts in the field. The qualification will benefit learners, society and the economy by delivering competent investigators who can contribute to a society and the economy by preventing, detecting and investigating economic crimes and other fraud-related misconduct. By competently investigating economic crimes, within the context of the ever-changing technological milieu, a significant contribution can be made to the combating of economic crimes and the restoration of the public's trust. |
| LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
| Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL):
The institution conducts RPL in terms of the policy and guidelines of the institution to recognise other forms of formal, informal and non-formal learning and experience. In cases where learners do not comply with the formal admission requirements, the institution applies its RPL policy. Entry Requirements: The minimum entry requirement for this qualification is: |
| RECOGNISE PREVIOUS LEARNING? |
| Y |
| QUALIFICATION RULES |
| This qualification consists of the following compulsory and elective modules at NQF Level 8 totalling 120 Credits.
Compulsory Modules at Level 8, 60 Credits: Elective Modules at Level 8, 60 Credits (Choose three): |
| EXIT LEVEL OUTCOMES |
| 1. Engage critically with the theory and practice of economic crime and other fraud-related misconduct.
2. Demonstrate an in-depth understanding of fraud risk management within organisations. 3. Demonstrate an in-depth understanding of the prevention, detection and investigation of financial crime and other fraud-related misconduct as well as the relevant methods, tools and techniques to be used. |
| ASSOCIATED ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
| Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 1:
Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 2: Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 3: Integrated Assessment: Assessment opportunities are considered an integral part of facilitating learning. Assessment is seen as central to the learning and teaching process, providing both formative and summative assessment opportunities as well as requiring an element of holistic, integrated assessment in line with the overall purpose of the qualification. Formative assessments are performed continuously throughout the programme. This includes written individual and group assignments, role-play, research reports and case studies. The summative assessment consists of written examinations which are moderated internally and externally. Faculty perform moderation appointed internal and external examiners according to prescribed University standards and policy. |
| INTERNATIONAL COMPARABILITY |
| This qualification compares with similar international qualifications in terms of the range of competencies in the learning content offered. |
| ARTICULATION OPTIONS |
| This qualification allows possibilities for both vertical and horizontal articulation.
Horizontal Articulation: Vertical Articulation: |
| MODERATION OPTIONS |
| N/A |
| CRITERIA FOR THE REGISTRATION OF ASSESSORS |
| N/A |
| NOTES |
| N/A |
| LEARNING PROGRAMMES RECORDED AGAINST THIS QUALIFICATION: |
| NONE |
| PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS QUALIFICATION: |
| This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
| 1. | University of Pretoria |
| All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |