|
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
| SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
| REGISTERED QUALIFICATION: |
| Bachelor of Education in Intermediate Phase Teaching |
| SAQA QUAL ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | |||
| 112486 | Bachelor of Education in Intermediate Phase Teaching | |||
| ORIGINATOR | ||||
| SANTS | ||||
| PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | NQF SUB-FRAMEWORK | |||
| - | HEQSF - Higher Education Qualifications Sub-framework | |||
| QUALIFICATION TYPE | FIELD | SUBFIELD | ||
| National First Degree | Field 05 - Education, Training and Development | Schooling | ||
| ABET BAND | MINIMUM CREDITS | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | QUAL CLASS |
| Undefined | 480 | Not Applicable | NQF Level 07 | Regular-Provider-ELOAC |
| REGISTRATION STATUS | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | |
| Reregistered | EXCO 0821/24 | 2019-10-14 | 2027-06-30 | |
| LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
| 2028-06-30 | 2033-06-30 | |||
| In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This qualification does not replace any other qualification and is not replaced by any other qualification. |
| PURPOSE AND RATIONALE OF THE QUALIFICATION |
| Purpose:
The qualification aims to develop resourceful, adaptable, flexible, knowledgeable, proactive, reflexive teachers specifically for Intermediate Phase teaching and learning, particularly for South African contexts and realities. To this end, pre-service teachers will become competent in educational theory, the context of education, schools, and classrooms, the requisite disciplinary knowledge, and pedagogical content knowledge essential for Intermediate Phase teaching and learning. They will develop a thorough understanding of the holistic development of the child from birth, as well as the educational and ecological contexts and issues that shape children's learning and experience of school. The qualifications will equip preservice teachers with an understanding of the legislative, professional demands, challenges, and opportunities. They emphasise their professional roles and position as agents of change. The design of the qualification and curriculum constitutes best practices in teacher education, empirical work on the kinds of knowledges pre-service teachers require (e.g., Shulman, 1987). The design and organising principles also ensure coherence, balance (in types of knowledge), logic, and progression within cognate modules and across the qualification. Rationale: The rationale for the design and implementation of this qualification is two-fold. First, it responds to the skills needed in the country, which, apart from the above, is also articulated in the 2015 research report by the Centre for Development and Enterprise (CDE). This research report identified the need for approximately 30 000 new teachers between 2013 and 2030. This report posits that in the Intermediate Phase, 13% more teachers' growth in teacher number as needed and it's adequately met by public institutions. Secondly, and given the institution's mission to reach and attract learners from diverse, primarily but not exclusively rural and socially disadvantaged contexts. Framing of the qualification is around conceptions of access and equity. Such conceptions subscribe to the South African constitution ideals that view access to education "as a basic human right" (as cited in du Plooy & Zilindile, 2014:189). Also draws on Wally Morrow's (2007) work on access and by implication, equity to situate its rationale. Morrow (2007) distinguishes between "formal" and "epistemological" access with the former defined as physical access to an institution(s) of learning. In other words, this type of access is dependent on the institution's admission rules as well as students' finances (Morrow, 2007). The second type of access that Morrow (2007) refers to is epistemological access to education, which he defines as access to the types of learning and knowledge sources that institutions such as universities and tertiary institutions offer. The National Plan for Higher Education (February 2001) acknowledges the efficacy of creating equitable access opportunities through a distance modality. It indicates the growing responsiveness of institutions to changes in learning and teaching technology but also to the needs of learners who are in employment who need to work to meet study costs" (Morrow, 2009:152). Morrow cites this document to highlight four key factors instrumental in the efficacy and rapid expansion of Distance Education in South Africa: 1) New modes of delivery through changes in ICT; 2) The need for greater cost efficiency; 3) Increased competition from private higher education providers; and 4) The role of distance education and resource-based learning in the context of resource restraints in expanding access, diversifying learners and enhancing quality (Morrow, 2009:151). |
| LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
| Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL):
The institutions allows admission to this qualification through RPL. Learners may apply for admission through RPL. The Academic Head of the institution for this qualification will design appropriate assessment instruments with the support of the Assessment Committee. The learner must complete the assessment instruments to form a portfolio of evidence (PoE) to prove their competence at the appropriate level in their respective subjects. Where applicant learner has prior experience in teaching in the Intermediate Phase, knowledge, and skills gained in this regard will be given due consideration through appropriate assessment and forming part of the overall PoE for RPL purposes. The Assessment Committee will make a recommendation to the Academic Board regarding each learner. Learners who are unsatisfied with the Board's decision will have the right to appeal through the appropriate appeals procedure. Entry Requirements: The minimum entry requirement for this qualification is: |
| RECOGNISE PREVIOUS LEARNING? |
| Y |
| QUALIFICATION RULES |
| This qualification comprises of compulsory modules at NQF Level 5, 6, and 7 totalling 497 Credits.
Compulsory Modules, Level 5, 126 Credits: Compulsory Modules, Level 6, 243 Credits: Compulsory Modules, Level 7, 128 Credits: |
| EXIT LEVEL OUTCOMES |
| 1. Read, write, and speak the language/in ways that facilitate one's academic learning.
2. Interpret and use numerical and elementary statistical knowledge to facilitate one's academic learning and to manage teaching, learning, and assessment. 3. Use Computer Information and Communications Technology (ICT) in daily life and teaching. 4. Demonstrate an understanding of the theoretical and pedagogical fields of study that influence education and teaching and learning decisions and practices. 5. Function responsibly within an education system, located institution, and the community. 6. Demonstrate respect for and commitment to the educator profession. 7. Read, write, and speak the language/s of instruction in ways that facilitate teaching in the classroom. 8. Demonstrate an understanding of: 9. Select, use, and adjust teaching and learning strategies in ways that meet the needs of both learners and context. 10. Demonstrate competence in managing and administering learning environments and supporting learners in ways to promote social justice ideals. 11. Demonstrate competence in monitoring and assessing learner progress and achievement. |
| ASSOCIATED ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
| Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 1:
Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 2: Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 3: Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 4: Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 5: Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 6: Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 7: Exit Level Outcome 8: Demonstrate an understanding of: Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 8: Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 9: Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 10: Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 11: Integrated Assessment: Specific assignments will integrate formative assessment across modules. For example, the fundamental modules such as Computer Literacy and Academic Literacy). Integrated assessment of applied competence refers to: a) Assessing several outcomes and modules together; b) Using a combination of assessment methods and instruments for an outcome/outcomes; c) Collecting naturally occurring evidence (such as in a workplace setting); and d) Acquiring evidence from other sources such as supervisors' reports, testimonials, portfolios of work previously done, logbooks, journals, amongst others. |
| INTERNATIONAL COMPARABILITY |
| The comparison of the Bachelor of Education in Foundation Phase Teaching to the following international qualifications:
In Australia, the following institutions offer a Bachelor of Education (Early Childhood and Primary) or Bachelor of Education (Early Childhood/Primary): (AQF Level 7, 4 Years): The similarities of the Australian qualification to the Bachelor of Education in Foundation Phase Teaching is as follows: However, the differences are: In New Zealand, the following institutions offer Bachelor of Education (Teaching) or Bachelor of Education (Teaching) Primary Level or Bachelor of Teaching (Primary) or Bachelor of Teaching and Learning (Primary), Level 7. The similarities of the New Zealand qualification to the Bachelor of Education in Foundation Phase Teaching is as follows: However, the differences are: In Canada, the following institutions offer Bachelor of Education (Elementary): The similarities of the Canadian qualification to the Bachelor of Education in Foundation Phase Teaching is as follows: Conclusion: From the comparative analysis it is evident that this qualification compares favourably in terms of the curriculum with the international for the primary school years. However, the design of this qualification is for the needs of the South African Intermediate Phase, while the international qualifications are more generalist in nature. |
| ARTICULATION OPTIONS |
| This qualification allows for both horizontal and vertical articulation.
Horizontal Articulation: Vertical Articulation: |
| MODERATION OPTIONS |
| N/A |
| CRITERIA FOR THE REGISTRATION OF ASSESSORS |
| N/A |
| NOTES |
| N/A |
| LEARNING PROGRAMMES RECORDED AGAINST THIS QUALIFICATION: |
| NONE |
| PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS QUALIFICATION: |
| This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
| NONE |
| All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |