|
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
| SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
| REGISTERED QUALIFICATION: |
| Bachelor of Education in Foundation Phase Teaching |
| SAQA QUAL ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | |||
| 112484 | Bachelor of Education in Foundation Phase Teaching | |||
| ORIGINATOR | ||||
| SANTS | ||||
| PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | NQF SUB-FRAMEWORK | |||
| - | HEQSF - Higher Education Qualifications Sub-framework | |||
| QUALIFICATION TYPE | FIELD | SUBFIELD | ||
| National First Degree | Field 05 - Education, Training and Development | Schooling | ||
| ABET BAND | MINIMUM CREDITS | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | QUAL CLASS |
| Undefined | 480 | Not Applicable | NQF Level 07 | Regular-Provider-ELOAC |
| REGISTRATION STATUS | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | |
| Reregistered | EXCO 0821/24 | 2019-10-14 | 2027-06-30 | |
| LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
| 2028-06-30 | 2033-06-30 | |||
| In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This qualification does not replace any other qualification and is not replaced by any other qualification. |
| PURPOSE AND RATIONALE OF THE QUALIFICATION |
| Purpose:
The qualification aims to develop resourceful, flexible, knowledgeable, and reflexive teachers for the Foundation Phase teaching and learning. To this end, pre-service teachers will become competent in educational theory, the context of education, schools, and classrooms, the requisite disciplinary knowledge, and pedagogical content knowledge essential for Foundation Phase teaching and learning. They will develop a thorough understanding of the holistic development of the child from birth, as well as the educational and ecological contexts and issues that shape children's learning and experience of school. The preservice teachers will understand what their profession entails. Also the legislative framework, policy, curricular, and professional demands, challenges, and opportunities. They emphasise their professional roles and position as agents of change. The design of the qualification and curriculum constitutes best practices in teacher education. The empirical work on the kinds of knowledge's pre-service teachers require are design and organising principles that ensure coherence, balance (in types of knowledge), logic, and progression. Three broad principles provide the overarching programmatic (and by implication, organising) and curriculum framework. Rationale: The rationale for the design and implementation of this qualification is two-fold. First, the qualification responds to the skills needed in the country, which, apart from the above, is also articulated in the 2015 research report by the Centre for Development and Enterprise (CDE). This research report identified the need for approximately 30 000 new teachers between 2013 and 2030. It posits that the teacher shortage is particularly acute in the Foundation Phase, specifically teachers able to use an indigenous African language as the language of teaching and learning. Secondly, and given the institution's mission to reach and attract learners from diverse, primarily but not exclusively rural and socially disadvantaged contexts. Framing of the qualification is around conceptions of access and equity. Such conceptions subscribe to the South African constitution ideals that view access to education "as a basic human right" (as cited in du Plooy & Zilindile, 2014:189). It draws on Wally Morrow's (2007) work on access and by implication, equity to situate its rationale. Morrow (2007). In other words, this type of access is dependent on the institution's admission rules as well as learners' finances (Morrow, 2007). Marrow (2007) refers to the second type of access as an epistemological access to education. He defines access to the types of learning and knowledge that institutions such as universities and tertiary institutions offer. The National Plan for Higher Education acknowledges the efficacy of creating equitable access opportunities through a distance modality stating that it "indicate(s) the growing responsiveness. Also, to the needs of learners who are in employment who need to work to meet study costs" (in Morrow, 2009:152). Morrow cites this document to highlight four key factors instrumental in the efficacy and rapid expansion of Distance Education in South Africa. These are: 1) New modes of delivery through changes in ICT; 2) The need for greater cost efficiency; 3) Increased competition from private higher education providers; and 4) The role of distance education and resource-based learning in the context of resource restraints in expanding access, diversifying learners and enhancing quality (Morrow, 2009:151). |
| LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
| Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL):
The institution allows admission to the qualifications through RPL Learners must apply for admission through RPL. The Academic Head of the qualification within the institution will design appropriate assessment instruments with the support of the Assessment Committee. The applicant will be required to complete the assessment instruments to form a Portfolio of Evidence (PoE) to prove their competence at the appropriate level in the selected respective subjects. Where applicant learner has prior experience in teaching in the Foundation Phase, knowledge and skills gained in this regard will be given due consideration through appropriate assessment and forming part of the overall PoE for RPL purposes. The Assessment Committee will make a recommendation to the Academic Board regarding each learner. Learners who are unsatisfied with the Board's decision will have the right to appeal through the appropriate appeals procedure. Entry Requirements: The minimum entry requirement for this qualification is: Or Or Or Or |
| RECOGNISE PREVIOUS LEARNING? |
| Y |
| QUALIFICATION RULES |
| This qualification consists of compulsory modules at NQF Level 5, 6, 7 totalling 494 Credits.
Compulsory Modules NQF Level 5, 168 Credits: Compulsory Modules NQF Level 6, 182 Credits: Compulsory Modules NQF Level 7, 144 Credits: |
| EXIT LEVEL OUTCOMES |
| 1. Read, write and speak the language in ways that facilitate one's academic learning.
2. Interpret and use numerical and elementary statistical knowledge to facilitate one's academic learning and to manage teaching, learning, and assessment. 3. Use Computer Information and Communications Technology (ICT) in daily life and teaching. 4. Demonstrate an understanding of the theoretical and pedagogical fields of study that influence education and teaching and learning decisions and practices. 5. Function responsibly within an education system, located institution, and the community. 6. Demonstrate respect for and commitment to the educator profession. 7. Read, write, and speak the language/s of instruction in ways that facilitate teaching in the classroom. 8. Demonstrate an understanding of the principles underpinning the disciplines for the various learning areas, pedagogical content knowledge of the learning areas/subjects to be taught, planning and designing learning opportunities, resourcing teaching, and learning; reflecting on teaching. 9. Select, use, and adjust teaching and learning strategies in ways that meet the needs of both learners and context. 10. Manage and administer learning environments and supporting learners in ways to promote social justice ideals. 11. Monitor and assess learner progress and achievement. |
| ASSOCIATED ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
| Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 1:
Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 2: Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 3: Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 4: Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 5: Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 6: Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 7: Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 8: Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 9: Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 10: Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 11: Integrated Assessment: Assessment in this qualification takes place through written assignments, tests, examinations, and during practical teaching in workplace integrated learning. Formative Assessment: The use of the following formative assessment methods: portfolios, academic assignments, research projects, etc. Student teachers have the opportunity to get feedback on their understanding of critical concepts through classwork/tutorial tasks early in modules. The teachers are given written feedback to improve the quality of their writing. Also, the development of writing competence is a shared responsibility across the qualification, although some modules are more reading/writing intensive than others. To optimise the value of formative feedback, feedback on formative assessment tasks takes place before the summative assessments, like tests and examinations. Tests and assignments are part of the continuous assessment for each module. The weight of the tests and assignments is a minimum of 40% of the final mark for the module, but in most modules contributes 60% of the final mark. Work Integrated Learning assessment consists of assessment during their Work Integrated Learning sessions at schools by a qualified teacher appointed and trained. Several feedback opportunities and repeat opportunities are scheduled to provide formative assessment and opportunity for improvement. Marks and rubrics are used to develop a continuous assessment score This counts for 60% of the overall assessment. Summative Assessment: A range of assessment practices are in place. Teachers are required to do summative assessments in the form of written tests, exams and ongoing continuous assessments as well as through Portfolios of Evidence, assessment of Reflective Journals, lesson plans and formal assessment during School Practice/WIL. For most modules the Examination mark contributes 40% to the final mark, but may be a maximum of 60%. The summative assessment of the Work Integrated Learning, is a Portfolio of Evidence. The pre-service teachers compile a portfolio that includes lesson plans, profiles of schools, learners, etc., written reflections, and exemplars of learning and teaching support materials. The WIL counts for 40% of the overall assessment. |
| INTERNATIONAL COMPARABILITY |
| The comparison of the Bachelor of Education in Foundation Phase Teaching to the following international qualifications:
In Australia, the following institutions offer a Bachelor of Education (Early Childhood and Primary) or Bachelor of Education (Early Childhood/Primary): (AQF Level 7, 4 Years): The similarities of the Australian qualification to the Bachelor of Education in Foundation Phase Teaching is as follows: However, the differences are: In New Zealand, the following institutions offer Bachelor of Education (Teaching) or Bachelor of Education (Teaching) Primary Level or Bachelor of Teaching (Primary) or Bachelor of Teaching and Learning (Primary), Level 7. The similarities of the New Zealand qualification to the Bachelor of Education in Foundation Phase Teaching is as follows: However, the differences are: In the United States of America the following institutions offer a Bachelor of Science in Elementary Education or Bachelor of Arts in Elementary Education or Bachelor of Science in Education/Elementary Education: The similarities of the American qualification to the Bachelor of Education in Foundation Phase Teaching is as follows: However, the differences are: Conclusion: From the comparative analysis it is evident that this qualification compares favourably in terms of the curriculum with international qualifications for teacher qualifications for the early years of the school programme. |
| ARTICULATION OPTIONS |
| This qualification allows possibilities for both vertical and horizontal articulation.
Horizontal Articulation: Vertical Articulation: |
| MODERATION OPTIONS |
| N/A |
| CRITERIA FOR THE REGISTRATION OF ASSESSORS |
| N/A |
| NOTES |
| N/A |
| LEARNING PROGRAMMES RECORDED AGAINST THIS QUALIFICATION: |
| NONE |
| PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS QUALIFICATION: |
| This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
| NONE |
| All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |