|
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
| SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
| REGISTERED QUALIFICATION: |
| Bachelor of Biblical Studies |
| SAQA QUAL ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | |||
| 111229 | Bachelor of Biblical Studies | |||
| ORIGINATOR | ||||
| Baptist Theological College of Southern Africa (The) NPC | ||||
| PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | NQF SUB-FRAMEWORK | |||
| - | HEQSF - Higher Education Qualifications Sub-framework | |||
| QUALIFICATION TYPE | FIELD | SUBFIELD | ||
| National First Degree | Field 07 - Human and Social Studies | Religious and Ethical Foundations of Society | ||
| ABET BAND | MINIMUM CREDITS | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | QUAL CLASS |
| Undefined | 360 | Not Applicable | NQF Level 07 | Regular-Provider-ELOAC |
| REGISTRATION STATUS | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | |
| Reregistered | EXCO 0821/24 | 2021-07-01 | 2027-06-30 | |
| LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
| 2028-06-30 | 2033-06-30 | |||
| In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This qualification does not replace any other qualification and is not replaced by any other qualification. |
| PURPOSE AND RATIONALE OF THE QUALIFICATION |
| The purpose of the Bachelor of Biblical Studies qualification is to equip the student with advanced biblical, theological, and practical competencies to be able to minister more effectively within their Faith Communities or to prepare them for leadership in the marketplace with a robust Christian foundation.
Rationale: Presented as a minimum qualification at a denominational level for ministry within the Baptist Union of South Africa and similar organisations although some denominations may require a higher-level qualification. The Bachelor of Biblical Studies maintains a focus on biblical languages, theology and biblical studies alongside an array of ministry expertise. This qualification aims at equipping the student with advanced and in-depth biblical, theological, and practical competencies to be able to minister more effectively within their Faith Communities. This Degree has a unique emphasis on experiential learning and spiritual formation. |
| LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
| Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL):
Entry may be granted via RPL and our RPL policy governs this process. Procedure for RPL and Credit Accumulation and Transfer (CAT) The applications, processing and approval for RPL and CAT shall follow the same procedure, with difference indicated, where applicable. Eligibility 1. The following persons are eligible for RPL: 2. The following persons are eligible for RPL: 3. Applications for RPL and Credit Accumulation and Transfer (CAT). 4. Evaluation of the application for RPL, the Admissions Committee will convene at set dated to evaluate the applications, which shall include: Entry Requirements. The minimum entry requirement for this qualification is: Candidates with previous experience and knowledge could enter the programme through a Recognition of Prior Learning and Experience (RPL/E) process. |
| RECOGNISE PREVIOUS LEARNING? |
| Y |
| QUALIFICATION RULES |
| This qualification consists of the following compulsory and elective modules at National Qualifications Framework Level 5, 6 and 7 totalling 360 Credits.
Compulsory Modules National Qualifications Framework (NQF) Level 5 126 Credits: Compulsory Modules NQF Level 6, 96 Credits: Electives Modules National Qualifications Framework (NQF) Level 6: Compulsory Modules NQF Level 7, 72 Credits: Electives Modules NQF Level 7. |
| EXIT LEVEL OUTCOMES |
| 1. Able to demonstrate advanced biblical and theological knowledge.
2. Able to demonstrate adequate competency within the respective fields of ministry expertise. 3. An advanced ability for accessing, processing, managing and articulating complex theological and contextual concepts. 4. Able to articulate advanced ministry concepts that lead to healthy church ministry, governance, congregational care and development amidst generational and cultural diversity. 5. Able to engage with the original biblical texts. Develop competency in translating, interpreting and applying scriptural knowledge holistically. 6. Able to function within a wider array of ministry contexts with the ability toward versatility and knowledge sharing for nation building and overall community development. 7. Able to apply relevant ministerial skills within selected vocation of expertise. 8. Able to review the historical importance, scope and development of the Christian movement within its current context and historical framework from a chosen denominational perspective. |
| ASSOCIATED ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
| Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 1:
Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 2: Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 3: Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 4: Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 5: Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 6: Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 7: Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 8: Integrated Assessment: (In line with our Assessment Policy, all assessment processes in Bible Training Centre (BTC) qualifications must adhere to the internationally accepted principles of assessment and higher education best practice that ensure that assessments are fair and provide accurate information on the competence of the individual who is being assessed. All faculty involved in assessment-related processes must ensure that all assessments of our academic programmes adhere to and promote the principles described in the list below: The outcomes that are being assessed must be clearly described in a language that is appropriate for the level of the programme and the persons being assessed. The method of assessment must be relevant to the performance being assessed. The assessment must stay within the parameters of what is required in the specified assessment outcomes. Every time the assessment is conducted or the assessment instrument is used it must assess the same outcomes at the appropriate level. If different assessors use the assessment instrument, they should make the same judgements under the same or similar circumstances. The assessment must provide all students with a fair, equal and reasonable opportunity to demonstrate their competence. It should not favour any student and should not be biased against any student. The method chosen to assess the learning outcomes must be fair and should not present any barriers that are not related to the work required, particularly for students with disabilities. The assessment methods should be reasonable, given the available financial resources, facilities, equipment and time. The assessment should not affect the learning negatively or unreasonably interfere with the normal work activities or productivity in the case of employed students. The student must understand the assessment process, the type of assessment, the outcomes that will be assessed and the criteria that will be used by the assessor. Three types of assessment may be used in BTC academic programmes: Diagnostic, Formative and Summative Assessment: Summative Assessments should be designed as integrated assessments by assessing related outcomes and/or courses together, where appropriate. The purpose of integrated assessment is to assess competence across a number of outcomes together to assess the ability of the student to apply the knowledge, skills and other competencies developed in an integrated manner. |
| INTERNATIONAL COMPARABILITY |
| A formal comparison has been undertaken along with Malyon Theological College in Australia (Accredited institution of Higher Learning) and with the South Western Baptist Theological Seminary in Texas (United States of America).
1. Follow study tracks in Bible & Languages and in Christian Thought & History. 2. Develop practical ministry skills (Evangelism and Missiology (EM), Pastoral and Church (PC), Developmental Ministries (DM)). BTC offers a very similar approach and although the specific subjects are contextual to the South African Context, the broad approach to their curriculum correlates completely to our Bachelor of Biblical Studies. |
| ARTICULATION OPTIONS |
| This qualification allows possibilities for both vertical and horizontal articulation.
Horizontal Articulation: Vertical Articulation: |
| MODERATION OPTIONS |
| N/A |
| CRITERIA FOR THE REGISTRATION OF ASSESSORS |
| N/A |
| NOTES |
| N/A |
| LEARNING PROGRAMMES RECORDED AGAINST THIS QUALIFICATION: |
| NONE |
| PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS QUALIFICATION: |
| This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
| NONE |
| All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |