SAQA

All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source.

SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY

REGISTERED QUALIFICATION:

Doctor of Philosophy in Criminal Justice

SAQA QUAL ID	QUALIFICATION TITLE
111052	Doctor of Philosophy in Criminal Justice
ORIGINATOR
University of South Africa
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY			NQF SUB-FRAMEWORK
-			HEQSF - Higher Education Qualifications Sub-framework
QUALIFICATION TYPE	FIELD		SUBFIELD
Doctoral Degree	Field 08 - Law, Military Science and Security		Justice in Society
ABET BAND	MINIMUM CREDITS	PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL	NQF LEVEL	QUAL CLASS
Undefined	360	Not Applicable	NQF Level 10	Regular-Provider-ELOAC
REGISTRATION STATUS		SAQA DECISION NUMBER	REGISTRATION START DATE	REGISTRATION END DATE
Reregistered		EXCO 0821/24	2021-07-01	2027-06-30
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT		LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT
2028-06-30		2031-06-30

In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise.

This qualification does not replace any other qualification and is not replaced by any other qualification.

PURPOSE AND RATIONALE OF THE QUALIFICATION

Purpose:
The purpose of this qualification is to enable the student to produce a doctoral research thesis which meets international standards of scholarly and professional writing under supervision in the discipline of Criminal Justice.

Rationale:
The qualification is designed to accommodate students who obtain the Master of Arts or Master of Technology Degrees in Criminology, Police Science, Forensic Science and Technology, Corrections Management, and Security Management and who wish to further their studies.

The qualification will educate and train researchers who can contribute to the development of knowledge at an advanced level by completing a single advanced research project in one of the indicated fields of Criminal Justice.

LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING

Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL):
Admission may be granted through RPL to learners who do not meet the minimum entry requirements.
All admissions through RPL must be in accordance with the principles laid down in the University of South Africa RPL Policy.

This qualification can be achieved wholly or in part through Recognition of Prior Learning.
The University of South Africa RPL office can supply full details of processes relating to the assessment and accreditation of learning from prior experiences. Evidence can be presented in a variety of forms, including international or previous local qualifications, reports, testimonials mentioning functions performed, work records, portfolios, videos of practice and performance records.
All such evidence should be judged according to the general principle of assessment described in the notes to assessors.

Entry Requirements:
A Master's Degree in the field of Criminal Justice, Level 9 or a related field.

RECOGNISE PREVIOUS LEARNING?

QUALIFICATION RULES

The Doctor of Philosophy in Criminal Justice consists of two compulsory modules at National Qualifications Framework (NQF) Level 10 totalling 360 Credits.

Modules:

Research Proposal, 0 Credits.

Research Project and Thesis, 360 Credits.

EXIT LEVEL OUTCOMES

1. Prepare a thesis in line with the chapter outline as set out in the approved Research Proposal.
2. Demonstrate comprehensive, expert and systematic knowledge of the specialist knowledge in the chosen area (field) of research.
3. Demonstrate comprehensive and thorough understanding of the most advanced research methodologies, techniques and technologies (including information retrieval and data processing skills) applicable in the broad field of the chosen research, and more particularly in relation to the research focus.
4. Apply knowledge, theory and research methods creatively to complex practical, theoretical and/or epistemological problems and engage in substantial, independent research and advanced scholarship resulting in the (re)interpretation and expansion of knowledge via scientific research.
5. Participate in scholarly debates at the cutting edge of research in the field of specialisation and communicate research undertaken to specialist and non-specialist audiences.

ASSOCIATED ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

Assessment criteria for Exit Level Outcome 1:

Develop each publication or chapter in line with acceptable scientific norms applicable to the Department of Environmental Sciences, in terms of logic, rationale, academic writing style, referencing techniques and the presentation of Tables and Figures.

Assessment criteria for Exit Level Outcome 2:

Critical evaluation of different theoretical frameworks underpinning field of research and justify selection of preferred framework is done.

Critical evaluation of literature in the broad field of his/her research, and more particularly in relation to his/her research focus is performed.

Assessment criteria for Exit Level Outcome 3:

Critical evaluation of the different and most advanced research methodologies, techniques and technologies relevant in the broad field of research, and detailed and logical motivation and justification for the chosen research location is carried out.

Assessment criteria for Exit Level Outcome 4:

Chapters of relevant work that form a thesis encompassing current theoretical and methodological practices, and solid empirical scholarship in keeping with international norms and standards are presented.

Assessment criteria for Exit Level Outcome 5:

Independent preparation of manuscripts/papers for presentation at workshops, and submission of manuscripts to scholarly journals for purposes of publication is carried out.
Reviewers' critique on manuscripts and published research in scholarly journals are defended/ contested/debated.

Integrated Assessment:
All assessments are conducted in line with the principles of assessment as defined in the University of South Africa Assessment Policy.

Submitted proposals are assessed and approved by the supervisor and Departmental Research and Higher Degrees Committee to be ratified by the College Research and Higher Degrees Committee.

After consultation with the co-supervisor (where applicable), the supervisor gives the learner permission to submit his/her thesis.

Assessment will include input from three external examiners of which at least one should be from a county other than South Africa. External examiners must be recognised experts in their fields and must not be attached to or affiliated with University of South Africa. All examiners are recommended by the Department Chairperson and/or Departmental Research and Higher Degrees Committee and their names are forwarded for appointment by the College Management Committee.

The completed report of the panel of examiners is regarded as the examiners' final recommendation. The result of the doctoral thesis is based on a judicious appraisal of the examiners' reports.

After the result of the learner's thesis has been approved the non-examining chairperson makes the examiners' report available to the Chairperson of the Department, the supervisor, the co-supervisor, the candidate and the other examiners if requested.

In addition, learners must demonstrate the ability to engage in the field of Criminal Justice in an integrative way, dealing with mathematical challenges strategically and effectively. It is recommended for this ability to be demonstrated by the publication of at least one article based on the research, in a scientific peer reviewed journal.

INTERNATIONAL COMPARABILITY

University of South Africa forms part of an internationally recognised accreditation system whereby university qualifications are evaluated against international comparators and accredited accordingly; for example, University of South Africa qualifications are accredited in the International Handbook of Universities and in the Commonwealth Universities' Yearbook.

ARTICULATION OPTIONS

This qualification articulates horizontally with others at Level 10 within the subfield.
The Doctor of Philosophy is the final step on the academic ladder. No further upward articulation is possible although learners may choose to pursue their studies at any Level of the National Qualifications Framework (NQF) to suit their personal and professional needs.

MODERATION OPTIONS

N/A

CRITERIA FOR THE REGISTRATION OF ASSESSORS

N/A

NOTES

N/A

LEARNING PROGRAMMES RECORDED AGAINST THIS QUALIFICATION:

NONE

PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS QUALIFICATION:

This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here.

NONE