Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 1:
Identify, analyse and solve concrete and abstract problems by drawing on the theoretical knowledge and experiential base of a single discipline or across interdisciplinary lines in science and technology.
Identify, analyse and solve problems in a variety of routine and non-routine contexts within a discipline or field of study.
Use their knowledge and experience to offer informed suggestions for solving problems at a community, national, international and global level.
Solve problems by generating alternative strategies for dealing with those problems.
Critically evaluate various theoretical standpoints and compare them to own views.
Offer evidence in a variety of ways (from theoretical knowledge base, from experiential base, etc.) to support their stated views.
Analyse the global, national and local community in terms of problems, needs, opportunities related to science and technology.
Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 2:
Demonstrate respect for the scientific opinion of others through (written and/or oral) reporting without bias.
Undertake projects of a theoretical and/or practical nature to provide evidence of successful interaction with others.
Use advanced scientific communication skills within the group.
Lead people effectively within the limits of their own competence.
Organise themselves and others into effective working groups.
Communicate the evidence of these group interactions through (written, oral, and/or modern data and telecommunication media) reporting.
Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 3:
Organise their study plans and engage in effective time management.
Evolve strategies best suited to their personal situations and contexts.
Think independently, and offer sustained theoretical evidence to support their decisions.
Assess their own strengths and weaknesses and develop organisational strategies.
Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 4:
Use library and other resources such as computers effectively to suit the needs of the particular area of research.
Integrate information from a variety of sources.
Act responsibly as a researcher and scholar (e.g. appropriate referencing, avoiding plagiarism, etc.).
Follow the conventions of scholarship in the discipline under study.
Apply relevant discipline-related conventions and guidelines to their academic and personal purposes.
Critically evaluate theories, examples, experimental results, etc.
Argue appropriately within the relevant discourse community.
Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 5:
Responsibly use the ideas of others in support of their own (without plagiarism, etc.).
Evaluate conclusions and premises in academic arguments.
Follow the literacy and numeracy conventions of written (and/or oral) use in the respective discipline.
Use appropriate models of organisation and presentation as required in the relevant discipline.
Use statistics (where necessary) effectively in support of their ideas.
Identify and illustrate discipline-specific jargon.
Use language to analyse, evaluate and critique the ideas of others.
Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 6:
Select technology to suit the needs of the individual or group.
Use natural resources in a sustainable way.
Show respect for and a responsible attitude towards science and technology.
Demonstrate a consideration of the ethics involved in science and technology issues.
Show respect and openness towards psychological, health and physical environment of others.
Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 7:
Use interdisciplinary methods to solving science and technology related problems.
Follow an integrated approach to learning and studying.
Integrated Assessment:
Assessment is done in line with the institution's policy.
Formative Assessment is done by means of activities in study guides, self-assessment questions in study guides and self-assessment assignments as well as written assignments that have to be submitted for assessment. The assignments are either in the form of multiple-choice questions (MCQs), short questions, essays or a combination. Students must submit at least two assignments for each module. The marks obtained for these assignments contribute a minimum of percentage towards the final mark for the module. The remaining mark is made up of the examination mark.
Summative Assessment is conducted by means of a two-to three-hour examination per module. |