Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 1:
Identify, analyse and solve complex and advanced abstract problems by drawing on their own experience and theoretical knowledge and on the experiential base of a single discipline or across interdisciplinary lines in the humanities.
Use their knowledge and experience to offer informed suggestions, or to generate alternative strategies, for dealing with problems at a community, national, international and global level.
Solve problems by generating alternative strategies for dealing with those problems.
Critically evaluate various theoretical standpoints and compare them to their own views.
Offer evidence in a variety of ways (from a theoretical knowledge base, from an experiential base, etc.) to support their stated views.
Analyse the global, national and local community in terms of problems, needs and opportunities.
Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 2:
Use and propagate 'people skills' (tolerance, empathy, listening skills, etc.) in group situations.
Demonstrate respect for the opinion of others through (written and/or oral) reporting without bias.
Demonstrate tolerance of diversity through (written and/or oral) reporting without bias.
Undertake projects of a theoretical and/or practical nature to provide evidence of successful interaction with other.
Use advanced communication skills within the group.
Act as supportive followers and group participants.
Organise themselves and others into effective working groups.
Communicate the evidence of these group interactions through (written and/or oral) reporting.
Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 3:
Demonstrate the requisite theoretical skills and learning strategies.
Organise their study plans and engage in effective time management.
Assess their own strengths and weaknesses and develop organisational strategies.
Evolve strategies best suited to their personal situations and contexts.
Think independently, and offer sustained theoretical evidence to support their decisions.
Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 4:
Communicate their ideas logically and provide supporting evidence in a sustained manner.
Evaluate conclusions and premises in academic arguments and produce sound arguments.
Use language competently, showing awareness of written (and/or oral) conventions relevant to the discipline.
Use appropriate models of organisation and presentation as required in the relevant discipline.
Use statistics (where necessary) effectively in support of their ideas.
Identify and illustrate discipline-specific jargon.
Analyse, evaluate and critique the ideas of others.
Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 5:
Communicate their ideas logically and provide supporting evidence in a sustained manner.
Evaluate conclusions and premises in academic arguments and produce sound arguments.
Use language competently, showing awareness of written (and/or oral) conventions relevant to the discipline.
Use appropriate models of organisation and presentation as required in the relevant discipline.
Use statistics (where necessary) effectively in support of their ideas.
Identify and illustrate discipline-specific jargon.
Analyse, evaluate and critique the ideas of others.
Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 6:
Demonstrate a responsible attitude towards scholarship and technology.
Use scientific methods of investigation, testing and evaluation.
Select technology to suit the needs of the individual or group.
Use natural resources in a sustainable way.
Show respect for and a responsible/ethical attitude towards science and technology.
Show respect and openness towards the psychological, health and physical environment of others.
Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 7:
Demonstrate their prior knowledge and experience as it is relevant to their discipline.
Connect the abstract knowledge of theory to the reality of their individual contexts.
Draw upon their prior knowledge (personal and abstract) and personal experience as Appropriate when investigating and analysing the world around the.
Look beyond and across traditional disciplinary boundaries for possible solutions.
Integrated Assessment:
The Programme utilises different types of assessment, that is, formative assessment (assignments), summative assessment (examination), self-assessment and portfolios. An adequate number of assignments is written by the students and this number hinges on the credits that each module has. For instance, four (4) assignments are written in modules with 24 Credits while two (2) assignments are written in AFL4801 where the credits are 12.
In the research report paper (HRAFL81) each student chooses the field he/she wants to do research on. Two assignments are written, with guidance from the lecturer, and finally a portfolio (summative) is submitted for examination. |
