|
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
| SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
| REGISTERED QUALIFICATION: |
| Diploma in Urban and Regional Planning |
| SAQA QUAL ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | |||
| 100733 | Diploma in Urban and Regional Planning | |||
| ORIGINATOR | ||||
| Cape Peninsula University of Technology | ||||
| PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | NQF SUB-FRAMEWORK | |||
| CHE - Council on Higher Education | HEQSF - Higher Education Qualifications Sub-framework | |||
| QUALIFICATION TYPE | FIELD | SUBFIELD | ||
| Diploma (Min 360) | Field 12 - Physical Planning and Construction | Physical Planning, Design and Management | ||
| ABET BAND | MINIMUM CREDITS | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | QUAL CLASS |
| Undefined | 360 | Not Applicable | NQF Level 06 | Regular-Provider-ELOAC |
| REGISTRATION STATUS | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | |
| Reregistered | EXCO 0821/24 | 2021-07-01 | 2027-06-30 | |
| LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
| 2028-06-30 | 2033-06-30 | |||
| In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This qualification replaces: |
| Qual ID | Qualification Title | Pre-2009 NQF Level | NQF Level | Min Credits | Replacement Status |
| 78673 | National Diploma: Town and Regional Planning | Level 6 | NQF Level 06 | 360 | Complete |
| PURPOSE AND RATIONALE OF THE QUALIFICATION |
| Purpose:
The purpose of the Diploma in Urban and Regional Planning is to develop graduates who can demonstrate focussed knowledge, skills and values in the field of urban and regional planning, with a focus on the spatial development function; including the sustainable design, regulation and management of the land use systems (and contestations arising there-from), to improve quality of human settlements, communities and economies of urban and regional environments. The programme includes a simulated planning practice through work integrated learning modalities throughout the programme and a minimum of 20 weeks internship/workplace-based learning in a supportive work environment in the third year of study. The diploma is aimed at individuals seeking a career as urban and regional planning technicians in the public, private and civil society sectors. Rationale: The programme has been designed to respond to the challenges highlighted in the National Development Plan (of the NPC), the National Spatial Development Perspective (NSDP), the Growth and Development Strategies (PGDS), ASGISA, JIPSA* (as enunciated in the JIPSA business Plan report (2007) for strengthening urban planning skills in South Africa: Assessment of Planning skills in South Africa), and other spatial policy and strategy frameworks. There is a need for more planners at all levels of government particularly at the Local, District and Metropolitan Municipality levels where there is a dearth of registered and qualified planners in view of number of planning functions, products and strategic documents including the integrated development plan (IDP), Spatial Development Framework (SDF), Land Use Management Schemes (LUMS), integrated transport plan (ITP), local economic development plan (LED), Provincial Growth and Development Strategies (PGDS), contributions to sector plan development (e.g. water services development plans, solid waste management plan, infrastructure master plans e.g. roads, sewerage, water etc), environmental management and development management. In addition, the academic department has consulted a range of stakeholders during the curriculum review process such as the following: a) Private Sector (Planning consultancies and their organisations; property and land development consultancies; property developers; resource exploration firms; etc.). b) Public Sector (National, provincial and local governments; parastatals; and other government agencies. c) Non-governmental organisations; community-based organisations. d) Statutory Bodies and other higher education institutions (SACPLAN; SAPI; CHOPS, etc.). The academic department is also a founding member and actively participates of the Association of African Planning Schools (AAPS), representing 50 planning institutions from all regions of Africa, and where the academic department is represented on the Steering Committee. AAPSs internationally recognised and benchmarked research programme on Revitalisation of Planning Education in Africa has been an influential platform for scholarly engagement. Furthermore, the academic department has participated in a consultation process to finalise the standards and requirements of the South African Council for Planners (SACPLAN) and these will be fully incorporated in the revised curriculum once finalised. The SACPLAN requirements align to the legislation applicable in this field of study in terms of the Planning Professions Act. This is currently work in progress. |
| LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
| Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL):
Recognition of Prior Learning is a process of identifying the knowledge and skills of an applicant against the admission requirements of a qualification and/or for credits against a part thereof. The process involves the identification, mediation, assessment and acknowledgement of knowledge and skills obtained through informal, non-formal and/or formal learning. The RPL process is multi-dimensional and multi-contextual in nature, aimed at the individual needs of applicants and is handled in accordance with an institutional RPL policy by a unit dedicated to this activity. The RPL process includes guidance and counselling, as well as the preparation of a body of evidence to be presented by the RPL candidate to meet institutional requirements. An appeal procedure is also in place to accommodate queries. RPL in this qualification will relate to gaining access to the qualification and/or credits/advanced standing as described in institutional guidelines. Entry Requirements: The minimum entry requirement is: Or |
| RECOGNISE PREVIOUS LEARNING? |
| Y |
| QUALIFICATION RULES |
| This qualification consists of compulsory modules at Levels 5 and 6 totalling 360 Credits.
Compulsory Modules at Level 5:120 Credits: Compulsory Modules at Level 6: 240 Credits: |
| EXIT LEVEL OUTCOMES |
| 1. Understand the structure and functions of urban settlements.
2. Understand the philosophy, history and theory of planning processes and practices. 3. Understand the theories and principles relating to the design of urban environments. 4. Understand the theories relating to the physical, social and economic environments. 5. Understand the theories relating to urban, metropolitan, rural and regional development, and of their context and processes. 6. 7. Understand the South African development needs and challenges in respect of population, housing, employment, poverty, health, safety and security, and the environmental resources situation and its consequences for planners. 8. Understand the administrative, legal, and political aspects of plan making and policy implementation. 9. Understand the impact and consequences of the processes of globalisation for local development. 10. Demonstrate knowledge of the different specialisation areas including economic development, transport planning, land use management, spatial planning, environmental planning, planning for community development, etc. 11. Use of different types of research skills and methods, including the collection, analysis and organisation of information to help determine the planning processes. 12. Use analytical techniques in order to determine the economic viability and impact of government programs, including development plans, housing plans, transportation plans, local economic development plans, feasibility studies, fiscal impact studies, public infrastructure investment plans, etc. 13. Argue for the implementation of plans, land management and development processes in terms of agreed legal principles and procedures. 14. Prepare plans and policies with a spatial orientation at different scales, including, site development plans, layout plans and development frameworks. 15. Use information technology tools to assist with research, analysis and design, including the use of Geographical information Systems, Computer Aided Design and animation tools. 16. Collaborate in problem solving and teamwork with regard to the preparation and design of plans and programs. 17. Demonstrate competency in the resolution of conflict and the facilitation of group decision-making through negotiation, facilitation and mediation skills. 18. Lead programmes and projects through the use of managerial and communication skills, including strategic leadership, organisational and financial management, project management and decision-making skills. 19. Display an orientation and commitment to issues of equity, social justice, economic welfare, and equity in the distribution of land and resources. 20. Familiarity with the role of government and citizen participation in a democratic society and the balancing of individual and collective rights and interest. 21. Develop a respect for the diversity of views and ideologies. 22. Understand the need to balance the need for the conservation of natural resources and the social and cultural heritage embedded in the built environment with the need for development. 23. Demonstrate familiarity with the ethics of professional practice and behaviour, including the relationship to clients and the public, and the role of citizens in a democratic society. |
| ASSOCIATED ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
| Integrated Assessment:
Integrated Assessment forms part of continuous assessment at the institution and takes the form of an appropriate mix of both formative and summative assessment methods. Assessment policy and practices at the institution promote constructive alignment of the curriculum, student centred-learning and assessment, and the importance of feedback to enhance student engagement. Assessment practices should be fair, reliable and valid. It should also be in keeping with academic disciplinary and professional field norms and standards. Formative assessment is aimed at enhancing student learning and provides students with an opportunity to reflect critically on their own learning and to improve their own levels of personal accountability and time management. Formative assessment usually consists of a variety of assessment tasks relevant to the field of study. In this qualification it will consist of a variety of tasks such as problem solving individual and/or group assignments and projects, case studies, portfolio development, class discussions, quizzes, field trip reports and other means of student engagement in learning. Summative assessment will take place at the end of a section of work/quarter or semester and is aimed at assessing learner's attainment against the learning outcomes of the programme and subject(s). Summative assessments are internally and externally moderated based on institutional policy and requirements. Summative assessments usually consist of a variety of formal assessment tasks relevant to the field of study, including written tests, reports and examination. In this qualification it will consist of written assessments in the form of written class tests and examination conducted during and at the end of the academic semester/year. |
| INTERNATIONAL COMPARABILITY |
| National and international benchmarking was conducted to determine the extent programme and subject structures compare with similar offerings at similar institutions. The international benchmarking exercise was conducted in terms of institutional requirements and guidelines which include the following: determining the scope of the benchmarking exercise; the selection of a variety of reputable Higher Education (HE) institutions internationally (and nationally); the selection of comparable qualifications and aspects from these qualifications; analysis and evaluation of programme design of the selected qualifications; conclusions and recommendations for curriculum renewal at the institution.
In terms of this particular qualification, benchmarking was done by comparing the existing qualification with those offered by other South African universities. In addition, the existing qualification was also benchmarked again the requirements of local and international professional organisation such as RTPI and the American Planners Association (ASA). The following sources were used for benchmarking purposes: (i) provisional standards developed by SACPLAN; (ii) international policies (including benchmarking documents of the Royal Town Planning Institute [RTPI], the American Planners Association [Planning Accreditation Board], Association of African Planning Schools [AAPS] Revitalization of Planning Education project; competencies developed by the Canadian Institute of Planners [2008] and the Planning Institute of Australia [2011]); and (iii) numerous journal articles and conference papers dealing with benchmarking of planning skills and competencies. The benchmarking contributed to the programme development in the following ways: a) Assess the demand for the offering of a technical qualification from industry stakeholders. b) Determine the purpose of the qualification. c) Determine the critical-cross field outcomes and Exit Level Outcomes for the programme. |
| ARTICULATION OPTIONS |
| This qualification allows for vertical and horizontal articulation.
Horizontal Articulation: Vertical Articulation: |
| MODERATION OPTIONS |
| N/A |
| CRITERIA FOR THE REGISTRATION OF ASSESSORS |
| N/A |
| NOTES |
| N/A |
| LEARNING PROGRAMMES RECORDED AGAINST THIS QUALIFICATION: |
| When qualifications are replaced, some (but not all) of their learning programmes are moved to the replacement qualifications. If a learning programme appears to be missing from here, please check the replaced qualification. |
| NONE |
| PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS QUALIFICATION: |
| This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
| 1. | Cape Peninsula University of Technology |
| All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |